Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Politics and World Leaders => Topic started by: Freddy Jooger on January 16, 2022, 07:30:00 AM
-
https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=61df123cd3f6f56c7b0af8b7
-
You know that InfoWars is controlled opposition, right? I know Alex and co. get some things right, but they also thrive on scare propaganda (much like the MSM)
-
You know that InfoWars is controlled opposition, right? I know Alex and co. get some things right, but they also thrive on scare propaganda (much like the MSM)
I find it quite credible that Jones is in fact Bill Hicks, who was enlisted by the FBI to become a gatekeeper (as they took out William Cooper). Jones will talk all day about the "international bankers" but then avoids and deflects when it's pointed out that they're all Jєωs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8wwPAVNVn8
-
I find it quite credible that Jones is in fact Bill Hicks, who was enlisted by the FBI to become a gatekeeper (as they took out William Cooper). Jones will talk all day about the "international bankers" but then avoids and deflects when it's pointed out that they're all Jєωs.
I don't get the obsession with Cooper. The man pushed the "galactic federation" BS and fed into the alien mythos.
-
I give AJ credit for allowing Nick Fuentes (a strong critic against Jєωs and "Israel") to have a platform on his show/site. Nick names the Jєω and says "Jєω". AJ even let Nick have a live debate with lawyer Robert Barnes about "Israel" and matters pertaining to the Jєωs. Also, Fuentes has a platform on InfoWars' affiliated site FreeWorldNews.TV
InfoWars has allowed subtle revelations about Jєωry on their show. I've witnessed it while it happened. They've put up some of David Dees' artwork during their broadcasts, same artwork that has the Star of David (Remphan) on the adversaries depicted in the artwork.
Nick's platform:
https://freeworldnews.tv/channel/nick-j-fuentes
-
Maybe AJ is reluctant to personally criticize the Jews not because he is afraid of blowback from the Jews but from evangelical protestants? That has to be a big part of his base, right? If he was just kowtowing to the Jews, he wouldn't allow any criticism of Israel or the Jews anywhere at all on his platform.
-
I don't get the obsession with Cooper. The man pushed the "galactic federation" BS and fed into the alien mythos.
That was where Cooper got his start, but then he shifted into the same government conspiracy stuff in the mid- to late- 90s that Jones eventually picked up on. Cooper actually predicted 9/11 before Jones did. Jones evidently ripped it off from him, and that's what made Jones popular, the fact that he predicted 9/11. Shortly after 9/11, Cooper was taken out.
-
Maybe AJ is reluctant to personally criticize the Jєωs not because he is afraid of blowback from the Jєωs but from evangelical protestants? That has to be a big part of his base, right? If he was just kowtowing to the Jєωs, he wouldn't allow any criticism of Israel or the Jєωs anywhere at all on his platform.
He was married to a Jєωess and had members of the Bronfmann family as his attorneys. There are lots of links tying him to all kinds of Jєωs.
I urge you to watch the Bill Hicks video above. What seals it for me is the nearly-identical dental profile.
-
I give AJ credit for allowing Nick Fuentes (a strong critic against Jєωs and "Israel") to have a platform on his show/site. Nick names the Jєω and says "Jєω". AJ even let Nick have a live debate with lawyer Robert Barnes about "Israel" and matters pertaining to the Jєωs. Also, Fuentes has a platform on InfoWars' affiliated site FreeWorldNews.TV
InfoWars has allowed subtle revelations about Jєωry on their show. I've witnessed it while it happened. They've put up some of David Dees' artwork during their broadcasts, same artwork that has the Star of David (Remphan) on the adversaries depicted in the artwork.
Nick's platform:
https://freeworldnews.tv/channel/nick-j-fuentes
Did you ever see David Duke and Jones debate?
https://davidduke.com/the-complete-david-duke-alex-jones-debate-in-hd/
I have reservations about Duke, but unreservedly opine that Jones is a blowhard, bull******* shill for the Jews.
-
Did you ever see David Duke and Jones debate?
https://davidduke.com/the-complete-david-duke-alex-jones-debate-in-hd/
I have reservations about Duke, but unreservedly opine that Jones is a blowhard, bull******* shill for the Jєωs.
Yes, I saw it. Duke clearly won the debate; and I was rooting for Duke, too.
-
AJ wore a yamika when he went to trial a few years ago. I assumed he was jooish
-
I give AJ credit for allowing Nick Fuentes (a strong critic against Jєωs and "Israel") to have a platform on his show/site. Nick names the Jєω and says "Jєω". AJ even let Nick have a live debate with lawyer Robert Barnes about "Israel" and matters pertaining to the Jєωs. Also, Fuentes has a platform on InfoWars' affiliated site FreeWorldNews.TV
InfoWars has allowed subtle revelations about Jєωry on their show. I've witnessed it while it happened. They've put up some of David Dees' artwork during their broadcasts, same artwork that has the Star of David (Remphan) on the adversaries depicted in the artwork.
Nick's platform:
https://freeworldnews.tv/channel/nick-j-fuentes
Nick Fuentes is an opportunist. He will say things against Jews and Israel but then brag about having some Jews in his "movement" and supported Lara Loomer (hardline Zionist Jew in favor of anti-BDS laws) when she ran in a local race in a Florida district.
Besides, Alex Jones is the poster boy for "conspiracy theorists" in Western society. He's what the average person thinks of when they hear the word "conspiracy theorist" due to the publicity he gets. Why is this? He's controlled op, meant to divert attention from the real issues by blaming problems in the world today on non-existent neo-nαzι elites and promoting outlandish theories like lizard men and things of that sort, in order to discredit the truther sphere in the mind of the general public.
More sincere truthers, like James Corbett for example, are obviously not given attention by the MSM due to their non-sensationalist takes, their respectable research methods, and their intellectual honesty.
-
I find it quite credible that Jones is in fact Bill Hicks
I had never heard of this idea before someone mentioned it in another thread. I did some searching on Google and saw some videos, and honestly the evidence I saw was extremely underwhelming. I guess their teeth are pretty similar, but that's about it. But I don't see the logic of saying that plastic surgeons changed Bill Hicks so completely (the two guys really look nothing alike, IMO), but left his teeth the same. What sense does that make? And Bill Hicks is 13 years older than Alex Jones, quite a stretch for a body double.
Is there more to this that I'm missing?
-
(http://judaism.is/images/alex%20jones.jpg?crc=47507032)
-
(http://judaism.is/images/alex%20jones.jpg?crc=47507032)
Indeed. This is absolutely brilliant. It's amazing what people are not able to see that is right in front of their faces.
-
Nick Fuentes is an opportunist. He will say things against Jєωs and Israel but then brag about having some Jєωs in his "movement" and supported Lara Loomer (hardline Zionist Jєω in favor of anti-BDS laws) when she ran in a local race in a Florida district.
Besides, Alex Jones is the poster boy for "conspiracy theorists" in Western society. He's what the average person thinks of when they hear the word "conspiracy theorist" due to the publicity he gets. Why is this? He's controlled op, meant to divert attention from the real issues by blaming problems in the world today on non-existent neo-nαzι elites and promoting outlandish theories like lizard men and things of that sort, in order to discredit the truther sphere in the mind of the general public.
More sincere truthers, like James Corbett for example, are obviously not given attention by the MSM due to their non-sensationalist takes, their respectable research methods, and their intellectual honesty.
I'll have to look into Nick supporting Loomer. That's news to me. I can't stand her.
Fuentes still does a lot of good work. I don't see him as an opportunist. Maybe a strategist. If he was an opportunist, he would've sold out to the Jєωs a long time ago.
AJ doesn't promote lizard people. Maybe David Icke still does... I never followed Icke but I've heard him mention "aliens" and "lizard people".
James Corbett is top notch.
-
I guess their teeth are pretty similar, but that's about it.
They're not just similar; they're nearly identical. Then you add all the resemblances, and the fact that both of them had the same "Producer" backing them, etc. etc. etc. There's a ton of evidence; it would have to be a huge coincidence that all these things just happened to line up.
-
AJ doesn't promote lizard people. Maybe David Icke still does... I never followed Icke but I've heard him mention "aliens" and "lizard people".
I like Icke; he's spot on about nearly everything, except the lizard people ... but, even with those, the way he describes them, as interdimensional beings, makes it sound like they're demons, and I have no issues with that. I do believe that demons will manifest themselves more and more in the corporeal world. My biggest issue with Icke has to do with the "presence" or "voices" he heard that ended up being his guide.
Icke was one of the first people all over the plandemic, describing in great detail what their intent was, when most of even the conspiracy theorists believed it was realy (in the very early stages).
So, in addition to gatekeepers and controlled opposition, there's another category that I call the "kookifiers", where they speak 98% truth, but then throw in something really bizarre and outlandish, which then by juxtaposition serves to discredit everything else they speak about, i.e. the truth. In addition to Icke, there's Hal Tuner (who had his e-mails hacked, and those revealed that he was in contact with the FBI), Jeff Rense, who juxtaposes sold truth, especially anti-Zionist stuff, with some bizarre nonsense like "the intelligence of plants," and Benjamin Fulford. Here's the thing about these guys, though; they have a lot of good information and are worth listening to if you can see through their agenda and not get sucked in.
-
He was married to a Jєωess and had members of the Bronfmann family as his attorneys. There are lots of links tying him to all kinds of Jєωs.
I urge you to watch the Bill Hicks video above. What seals it for me is the nearly-identical dental profile.
I had to stop when he started talking about no one ever having seen Bill Hicks and AJ in the same room. Wow. What next? Joe Biden IS Lee Harvey Oswald! Hunter Biden IS Ben Stiller! Same teeth, almost! Never saw them in the same room at the same time.
-
Bill Hicks 1993
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nMzXBoFyGGo/maxresdefault.jpg)
Alex Jones 1994
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/p2dC0p7d9do/maxresdefault.jpg)
These are two different people.
-
I have to agree with Clemens. The whole teeth thing makes no sense. (First of all, I see almost no real resemblance between Jones and Hicks, but leaving that aside for a second ...), the video said that Jones' teeth and Hicks' teeth are virtually identical. They aren't, really, but the video said their teeth were left alone by the plastic surgeons who otherwise did a nearly miraculous transformation on Bill Hicks to make him look like the completely different Alex Jones. But for some reason they made no change to what is probably the easiest part of the face to change, i.e., the teeth? They couldn't even send Hicks to an orthodontist like practically every American in existence to get him some braces? But then in the areas where the teeth are not the same, such as the tooth that is towards the front next to the lower cuspid, which is significantly different in the two men, they explain that by saying that it was filed down by the plastic surgeons. Well, if they were going to start filing on his teeth, why would they file down one or two teeth and leave everything else in place? Did they think no one would take pictures of Alex Jones smiling and showing his teeth? None of this makes any sense.
-
I'll have to look into Nick supporting Loomer. That's news to me. I can't stand her.
Fuentes still does a lot of good work. I don't see him as an opportunist. Maybe a strategist. If he was an opportunist, he would've sold out to the Jєωs a long time ago.
AJ doesn't promote lizard people. Maybe David Icke still does... I never followed Icke but I've heard him mention "aliens" and "lizard people".
James Corbett is top notch.
Most of those clips have been disappeared from YT due to Nick's fanboys getting continually banned ever since his "America First" channel got banned. But I remember watching clips from his streams back when he voiced support for Loomer...hypothetically I could perhaps get access to those again if I were to pay a subscription to his site, which is not happening. I don't want to financially support grifters of any kind.
Here is this paragraph from Nick's Wikitubia page (https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/America_First_with_Nicholas_J_Fuentes) that describes his relationship with Loomer:
Nick was criticized for speaking highly of Laura Loomer, due to her being Jєωιѕн. Many wignats claim that he is now compromised due to him including Jews and non-white people in the movement. Nick continued to speak highly of Laura.
Not to mention his friendship with Jєωιѕн agitator "Baked Alaska"....this guy has a whole lot of issues.
Not to derail this thread, here is the original Nick Fuentes thread:
https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/nick-fuentes/msg726656/#msg726656
(https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/nick-fuentes/msg726656/#msg726656)We can discuss more about him there.
-
Nick Fuentes is an opportunist. He will say things against Jєωs and Israel but then brag about having some Jєωs in his "movement" and supported Lara Loomer (hardline Zionist Jєω in favor of anti-BDS laws) when she ran in a local race in a Florida district.
Besides, Alex Jones is the poster boy for "conspiracy theorists" in Western society. He's what the average person thinks of when they hear the word "conspiracy theorist" due to the publicity he gets. Why is this? He's controlled op, meant to divert attention from the real issues by blaming problems in the world today on non-existent neo-nαzι elites and promoting outlandish theories like lizard men and things of that sort, in order to discredit the truther sphere in the mind of the general public.
More sincere truthers, like James Corbett for example, are obviously not given attention by the MSM due to their non-sensationalist takes, their respectable research methods, and their intellectual honesty.
Yes, James Corbett is way more trustworthy than AJ. AJ is entertaining. He certainly has his finger on the pulse of the Patriot movement. But he and his father admitted under oath that they pushed the Sandy Hook fαℓѕє fℓαg story despite knowing that it was false. They knew their material wasn't true but they published it anyway. And the father admitted that the motivation was that it would be popular, i.e. it would make more money. Who needs "controlled" opposition when simple greed will get the job done? That isn't to say that AJ is always publishing falsehood. Probably a lot of his material is true but how do you know when it isn't? Corbett is not afraid to admit facts that don't necessarily support his views. For example, he admitted that the excess deaths for 2020 (not 2021! this was a few months ago) were slightly higher than normal. That doesn't fit too well with the view that covid was a scam. But he pointed out that it is unclear what was the cause of the higher mortality. He argued that the lockdowns could easily account for the higher rate. Alex Jones, on the other hand, is more of a politician than a researcher. He has no problem publishing lies if it will further the cause (of making money apparently).
-
I don't know about you, Yeti, but when I'm watching some of these conspiracy videos I sometimes start feeling like they are mocking me.
-
I mean, "they were never seen in the same room". What?