I couldn't agree more.

Just as the Jews subverted and perverted the esteem for holy poverty and abhorrence of greed that lingered in what remained of the West's collective Sensus Catholicus (via Marxism's warped apotheosizing of the proletariat and demonization of any class that possessed a little more than nothing), so too have they exploited the void in the Western Man's soul that was once occupied by what the Jews sneeringly call "Catholic Guilt," by subverting and perverting that keenly felt sense of one's own personal unworthiness into a feeling of racial guilt and unworthiness (funny how they always tell us that the "white race doesn't even exist" when we dare extol its virtues - it sure pops back into existence when it's time to talk about "white privilege").

Anyway, as the post which you so expertly excoriate demonstrates, White Guilt, that diabolical Jєωιѕн mockery of Catholic Guilt, is in no short supply even among those who - being Catholics - should not have a Catholic-Guilt-shaped hole in their souls ready to be filled by that virtue's Jєωιѕн ape. Indeed, as you point out right off the bat in your response, these guilty white Catholics never miss a chance to signal their "virtue" to any and all within earshot. How perfect - not only do they trade a Catholic virtue for a Jєωιѕн parody - they're even pharisaical about it!

"O God I give Thee thanks that I am not as the rest of white men: racists, privileged, microagressors, as also is this redneck."

To think it probably stems from so seemingly innocuous a vice as curling up with a bowl of popcorn in front of the boob tube for a nightly dosage of Norman Lear sitcoms.

You must be thinking about someone else.  I certainly don't have "white guilt", and there is "privilege" attached to all races and demographics, just different types of privilege for different sorts of people.  Yes, as a white male, I can take a road trip by myself, check into a mom-and-pop motel in a small Southern town, go to a local diner to eat, take a drive around town to see what the place looks like, and stop by the local bowling alley, rent a pair of shoes, and work on my bowling skills by myself.  A dark-skinned black woman with cornrows or dreadlocks might have a more difficult time --- while she could "do" these things, she might get funny looks, especially at the bowling alley, and just generally create a certain discomfort both for herself and for others.  

On the other hand, no harsh word may ever be spoken by a white person about any person of color --- that's "racist".  A white male can never comment on how handsome or pretty a little child is --- he is suspected of being a pedophile.  Can you imagine a historically ethnic white college (such as, for instance, Finlandia University in Michigan's Upper Peninsula) printing T-shirts saying "the whiter the college, the sweeter the knowledge"?  And IQ tests that highlight differences in intelligence between races (taken as a whole, not individuals within them)?  Why, they're racist and culturally biased, haven't you heard?  (Never mind that the highest mean IQs are found in East Asians, who, mirabile dictu, are not white, and I have to question whether IQ tests worldwide are biased to favor Asians.)

And since you raised it as an issue, I recognize Norman Lear sitcoms for what they are --- often reasonably well-done light comedies that are leftist, socialist propaganda of the highest order.  I don't waste a lot of time on television.

Just to throw it out there, do we have any retired military here?  What would be their thoughts on racial matters?  (Regrettably, I never served.)  Just asking because it's commonly known that the military is supposed to be the place in our society where race matters the least.

I thank you for your remarks, which elaborate fruitfully on matters my own overlooked. Apropos which,

In my mind's ear, I can hear this sentence spoken in the inimitable accent of Andrew Cuomo, as pharisaical a gent as now lives upon this earth. Perhaps he is SimpleMan's role model!

I didn't think it was accurate to claim that a person, with skin tone, features, and speech commonly associated with American blacks --- that is to say, those who couldn't "pass" if they chose to --- should be referred to as "not really black" because they also have a sizeable amount, even a majority, of non-African blood.  It's a cultural thing, not a racial one.  I retracted a comment I had made.  That's all.  I don't see why that is such a big deal.

But if a person does have predominantly white blood, and if black DNA has moral degeneracy hard-coded into it (I don't claim this, but some might), then doesn't it stand to reason, that this octoroon would think and behave far more like a white person, and would have far less moral degeneracy, than someone not so mixed?

I'm going to have to leave you guys with your own ideas.  I've said all I can say.

So while I've said all **I** can say, I'd be interested to know the thoughts of Archbishop Lefebvre about the innate nature of black African people.  Vicar Apostolic, and later Archbishop, of Dakar, Apostolic Delegate for French West Africa, he'd know better than any of us here, don't you think?

Kamala had "Black privilege" or Indian privilege or partial-white privilege, whatever.

Her ancestors were slave owners, so if anyone should PAY reparations, it's Kamala.

https://freebeacon.com/politics/kamala-hαɾɾιss-ancestors-owned-slaves 

Yes, this is pretty accurate!  Positively nails it!

However, it's just a reality of American life, that if someone looks even superficially black, and identifies as such, they are treated and approached as though they are black --- both positively and negatively, as the case may be.

I don't see how this observation could be remotely upsetting or controversial.

The whole "Dems are the Real Racists" is a tired trope at this point. As Nick points out in this video, Leftists really don't care about this kind of rhetoric. The Republican Party (and those on the Dissident Right) are better off spending their time trying to unite their base and getting the independents on their side by going for a "Law and Order" pitch, rather than trying to convince those who are stupid enough to think that Trump = Hitler to vote for them.

Nick Fuentes was hitherto someone I disregarded as he talked a great deal without any real experience of life except online grifting. However, with his closest dearest friend Catboy Kami and their date stream, Nick is patently someone of sodomitical leaning. I wouldn't heed anything that Mexican boy has to say.
I am surprising CNN dug up something that would be considered negative (now Biden was right, forced busing was a terrible idea).

 

August 19, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Pro-life activist David Daleiden has accused the Democratic nominee for vice president, Senator Kamala hαɾɾιs (D-Calif.), of acting “at the behest” of abortion provider Planned Parenthood, calling her “a dangerous candidate.”
During an interview with Breitbart News Sunday, a weekly radio show on SiriusXM, Daleiden said, “Kamala hαɾɾιs is the biggest threat to First Amendment civil liberties and First Amendment civil rights that our country has ever seen, in my opinion.”
Before becoming a senator and then presidential candidate Joe Biden’s running mate, hαɾɾιs worked as attorney general of California. In that position, she played a key role in defending Planned Parenthood over its sale of aborted baby parts (which violated multiple federal laws, according to undercover video of abortion industry personnel).
Instead of investigating Planned Parenthood for illegal activity, hαɾɾιs announced she would investigate Daleiden and his Center for Medical Progress (CMP). She subsequently ordered a raid on Daleiden’s home while accepting the abortion giant’s donations for her Senate run.
Numerous pro-life organizations called on hαɾɾιs to resign over the apparent conflict of interest, and Daleiden’s attorneys cited leaked emails that showed hαɾɾιs’s office coordinating with Planned Parenthood to draft legislation to criminalize undercover investigations like CMP’s.
In May, Daleiden filed a lawsuit against hαɾɾιs; Planned Parenthood; and hαɾɾιs’s successor, California attorney general Xavier Becerra, for a “brazen, unprecedented, and ongoing conspiracy to selectively use California’s video recording laws as a political weapon to silence disfavored speech.”


In his conversation with Breitbart News Sunday, Daleiden recounted his experience of Kamala hαɾɾιs as attorney general.
“Kamala hαɾɾιs, at the behest of her political patron — Planned Parenthood — targeted me for criminal punishment solely because of the content of the message that I was publishing and speaking at the time as you mentioned the undercover video series showing top-level Planned Parenthood officials callously negotiating the harvesting and sale of tiny aborted baby hearts and lungs and livers and brains,” he said.
He also pointed out the hypocrisy of hαɾɾιs selectively enforcing state law on recording conversations taking place in public places like restaurants.
“In the State of California, when Kamala hαɾɾιs was the attorney general, you could do undercover investigations of factory farming, corrupt chiropractors, [and] fraudulent air conditioning repairmen,” he explained.
“Local TV news journalists in California [were] filming and publishing undercover video with conversations — sometimes even in private office spaces — and publishing these videos in on [sic] a daily[,] weekly basis. Not a single one of those journalists ever had their home raided or were prosecuted by Kamala hαɾɾιs’s attorney general’s office.”
Meanwhile, “if you did the exact same kind of undercover filming and publishing, and your message was something that questioned Planned Parenthood or questioned the abortion industry — the sacred cows of Kamala hαɾɾιs and the San Francisco political establishment in California — then in that case, I became the first and only person involved in news gathering, the first and only citizen journalist in the state of California to ever have the California video recording law enforced against me, criminally.”
Daleiden explained that “California has a video recording law that you’re not allowed to record private or confidential conversations … If it’s a conversation that can be overheard by anybody, if it’s out in a public area, if it’s at a public restaurant, then that’s permitted. And that’s typically what news organizations and what citizen reporters do in California.”
He also emphasized hαɾɾιs’ hypocrisy in handling his case, compared to other cases where her office relied on recordings of conversations in public places.
“Kamala hαɾɾιs’ deputy prosecutor,” Daleiden said, “admitted a few years later in 2018 in a filing in court that the reason that I alone have become the first citizen journalist in California to be prosecuted under the California video recording law — to have that law criminally enforced against me when it was enforced against against nobody else for news gathering in California — is because of the content of the videos themselves.”
“It is blatant, unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and invidious targeting of Americans whose message Kamala hαɾɾιs disagrees with,” Daleiden commented. “So, she is a huge threat to our First Amendment civil liberties in this country.”
Regarding the relationship between Planned Parenthood and Kamala hαɾɾιs, he said, “Just two weeks before she ordered the raid on my home, Kamala hαɾɾιs had a secret in-person meeting in Los Angeles with several top-level Planned Parenthood of California officials.”
“We have the action items from that meeting in an email that was produced to us in discovering the case, and those action items show that the meeting was primarily to discuss Planned Parenthood’s political agenda in the state of California, but included within their political agenda were the issues involved in Kamala hαɾɾιs’s investigation of me,” he continued.
The current Democratic nominee for vice president was thus “blatantly mixing her political constituent services functions with her law enforcement powers and basically prostituting her law enforcement powers to the service of her political campaign donors.”
Daleiden said hαɾɾιs was engaging in her activities despite a conflict of interest. “She was running for United States Senate at that exact same time in March and April in 2016. She had petitions urging political support for Planned Parenthood on her campaign website.”
“It is a blatant use and abuse of law enforcement power solely to serve private partisan political interests, and that is why she is such a dangerous candidate,” Daleiden emphasized.

Proof that narcissism is at the core of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. He's beside himself in lust.

I never thought of that, but you're probably right.