I always thought Jєωs were ugly because they were evil.  I mean as an ethnic group, they seem to stand out in the ugliness scale and not in a nice way, but more in a creepy way.  

this post is ugly

The main reason Jєωs are so damn ugly and predatory/creepy-looking is because of their racial curse stemming from the events in Matthew 27:25.

they are created in God's image.
If they choose to be re-made in the image of Satan, that is THEIR concern and they will eternally pay for it. You should pity those who go down that path and pray for them, not call them ugly, as if physical appearances are so important. That makes no sense and comes across as extremely childish and shallow

You seem insulted.  Wasn't trying to insult you.  However, beauty is not entirely subjective;  there is such a thing as objective beauty and objective ugliness.  Unfortunately, it is very fashionable to believe that all beauty/ugliness is subjective/relative/ethno-cultural and that all people/art/architecture/creation are equal.  Still, if there is an order to things and if there is good and evil, then there must be such a thing as beauty and ugliness, independent of our own biases and prejudices.  Furthermore, if we are endowed with a free will, then we must be able to discern/justly discriminate between the two.  Surely, goodness is beautiful and evil is ugly.  Of course, that belief seems so often lost when dealing with novus ordo catholics.  

No, not at all insulted. I just see too many good-looking Jєωs. If they all looked like the Jєωs in the pics posted above then I would agree that they all wear their cursedness.

thank God, the voice of reason
I think Benjamin Netanyahu is a very good looking man. Maybe that is just me and a few others, but ... whatever. Other than that, I won't say much more bc this is a boring subject. It is what is inside a person (or not) that is interesting and intriguing and fascinating, not the outsides, which in time, fade (with all people)

Do you think Christianity is a religion of love?  Do you think Judaism is equal to that?  

Maybe you're just seeing what you want to see, because it makes you feel better about yourself to think we're all "equal."  

I don't think it's coincidence that Karajan is handsome and Levin is hideous;  I think it's a pattern.  Alan Greenspan looks a lot like some of the dogs I've seen at the pound, Donald Trump, not so much

You're picking and choosing. As I said earlier, in any gene pool you'll find that the majority is unremarkable looking, a minority ugly, and a minority good-looking. I don't need to think Jєωs are uglier than gentiles, on average, to think they're children of the devil. Here's a couple good-looking Jєωs, Cary Grant (Archie Leach) and Gal Gadot:

You're picking and choosing. As I said earlier, in any gene pool you'll find that the majority is unremarkable looking, a minority ugly, and a minority good-looking. I don't need to think Jєωs are uglier than gentiles, on average, to think they're children of the devil. Here's a couple good-looking Jєωs, Cary Grant (Archie Leach) and Gal Gadot:

Yeah, well Napoleon torn down the ghetto walls and brought Jєωs The Enlightenment.  So, Jєωs started breeding with Christians.  

Stereotypes become stereotypes, because there is a general basis in fact.  Hence,  Jєωs (say past thousand years or so, not ancient israel) have often been portrayed as ugly, by Christian cultures and Jєωs have been considered envious.  Liberals hate that, but liberals are usually wrong about "everything."  

Cary Grant "considered" himself Jєωιѕн, but there wasn't any proof.  Unless, you consider his frequent donations to Jєωιѕн causes as proof.  I don't.  Everybody in Hollywood knew it was a huge advantage to be Jєωιѕн and Cary Grant was the richest man in Hollywood.  So, he knew how to get paid.  

My favorite example of posers in Hollywood is Whoopi Goldberg.  She used to claim she was Jєωιѕн, until somebody took a closer look.  

"She may be well known as a singing nun in Sister Act, but actress Whoopi Goldberg has claimed she feels just as Jєωιѕн as she does black.

Speaking this week at a charity event in London, the Oscar-winning actress said: "I just know I am Jєωιѕн. I practise nothing. I don't go to temple, but I do remember the holidays. Religion is a lot of work, it's exhausting. So I keep it simple, I have a pretty good relationship with God. We talk.'"

She added: "When people heard the name 'Whoopi Goldberg', and then I turned up, I was not what they were expecting.

"People would ask me in a roundabout way, 'So are you?' And I would say 'What?' And they'd say 'What does your name mean?' And I would say 'Do you mean Whoopi?' And they'd say 'No, the other name.' And then they would say 'Come on, are you Jєωιѕн?' And I always say 'Would you ask me that if I was white? I bet not.'" The name is wonderful for starting conversations.""

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/whoopi-goldberg-i-m-Jєωιѕн-and-i-talk-to-god-1.23000

"She said in 2011, "My mother did not name me Whoopi, but Goldberg is my name, it's part of my family, part of my heritage. Just like being black."[18] Henry Louis Gates, Jr., in his book In Search of Our Roots: How 19 Extraordinary African Americans Reclaimed Their Past, found that all of Goldberg's traceable ancestors were African Americans, that she has no known Jєωιѕн ancestry, and that none of her ancestors were named Goldberg.[12]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whoopi_Goldberg#cite_ref-JC_18-0

if you DONT think it is a religion of love (Christianity)
then I will remember not to post a response to YOU again... And Judaism is a religion of love because God made Jєωs the Chosen People and revealed himself to them. It is about us loving God... because He loves us.. So, yeh, if you are saying the opposite of this, you are ignorant of history and Catholic history in particular

Nobody is forcing you to do anything, but if you are gonna put stuff out there, people are going to respond to it.    

You seem to think that all religions of The World are equal.  I don't and I don't apologize for that.  Furthermore, your opinions seem to have been formed at places like FoxNews and Novus Ordo Chapels.  I don't understand why you are attracted to this forum.  I would think that a place like CatholicAnswersForum would be more to your liking, than a Catholic Resistance Forum (that is resistance to the changes and spirit of vatican II, which would include resistance to things like ecuмenicalism and Christian-Jєωιѕн "Dialogue").