Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Arpaio pardon  (Read 4492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Arpaio pardon
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2017, 12:01:37 AM »
...  but it does look like

to?

Arpaio is covering up for Pizzagators( Templars)......
Yesterday  I heard the latter boast about his co-operation with Watergator G (Gordon) Liddy in some law enforcement  operation.

 and?

 Liddy's son was arrested last week on about 40 counts of child porn possession... :sleep:

  To clarify, I wasn't just referring to you, but to this thread. You heard what you heard. Fine, but this kind of flailing speculation never seems to lead anywhere but down. I appreciate the request for clarification / specifics. Thank you.

Re: Arpaio pardon
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2017, 01:56:49 AM »
I am stupid, but who would handle sex crimes?  Police or Sheriff or both?  And of course we had a dioceses with sex crimes and who handles that?  One day sex crimes will not be a crime, as long as the left gets their way; no laws.
Law enforcement is in charge of investigating sex crimes.
In the case of a diocese with sex crimes it is still the responsability of the law enforcement to investigate and prosecute. If the bishop has credible evidence of illegality the responsable thing to do is call the law enforcement and give up the evidence.
In the case of Sheriff Joe Arpaio the possibility of there being an investigation leading to a criminal prosecution would have been nil. That is how he 'protected' the people of Maricopa County. 


Re: Arpaio pardon
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2017, 02:24:07 AM »
Failure to investigate sex crimes
During a three year period ending in 2007, more than 400 sex crimes reported to Arpaio’s office, most from El Mirage, a suburb of Phoenix with a large immigrant population, were inadequately investigated or not investigated at all, it was claimed. Among them were 32 reported offenses against children.
In 2015 officials settled a multi-million dollar lawsuit out of court after the sheriff's office failed to properly investigate the rape of a 13-year-old girl.

http://www.newsweek.com/joe-arpaio-pardoned-concentration-camps-obama-birther-squad-and-other-655581

Where was Joe Arpio's toughness in the investigationof the 13 year old girls rapist? This rapist appears to have gotten a pass from the 'tough' Joe Arpio.  

Re: Arpaio pardon
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2017, 02:27:58 AM »
Racial profiling 
Then in May, 2013, the Justice Department announced that it was investigating longstanding allegations of discrimination against Latino citizens by Arpaio's office.
That suit alleged the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office had targeted Hispanic immigrants during patrols and traffic stops and had violated their right to privacy under Arpaio’s leadership. The case was eventually settled in 2015, with the Sheriff's office agreeing to establish policies that prevented retaliation against officials who wouldn't comply with Arpaio's targeting of immigrant communities. 
Then in early summer 2017, Arpaio went on trial accused of disobeying a court order to stop patrols targeting immigrants. In July he was convicted, and ahead of the presidential pardon had been scheduled to be sentenced in October. Arpaio could have faced up to six months in jail. 
http://www.newsweek.com/joe-arpaio-pardoned-concentration-camps-obama-birther-squad-and-other-655581
I want to remind you that among the original people of Arizona are the Americans of Mexican descent. The majority of the hispanic people of Arizona are not immigrants they are the original inhabitants. I don't think that they should be targeted for immigration removal.   

Re: Arpaio pardon
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2017, 02:32:27 AM »
"Birther" investigation posse 
Arpaio’s relationship with Trump began earlier this decade, as the property magnate geared up his political career by spreading the birther conspiracy theory about President Barack Obama.
Arpaio was one of the few public figures who also touted the theory, and in 2011 even announced he was forming a five man “cold case posse” to investigate the theory. In a letter to Arpaio, Trump praised the move.
The officials traveled to Hawaii to investigate Obama's birth certificate and claimed to have found evidence that it was a forgery. Critics denounced the move as a political stunt by Arpaio, who has continued to declare his belief in the theory. Trump regularly boasted that he would offer evidence, but as of this reporting, he has yet to do so. 
Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama’s citizenship, and the courts have rebuffed a series of lawsuits.
In 2016 he endorsed Trump, spoke at the Republican National Convention that summer, and was even mentioned as a possible contender to head up the Department of Homeland Security.

http://www.newsweek.com/joe-arpaio-pardoned-concentration-camps-obama-birther-squad-and-other-655581
While sheriff Arpaio didn't have enough resources to investigate sex crimes in his jurisdiction, he did seem to find the money to fly officials out to Hawaii in a search for Obama's birth certificate. Am I to understand that sending officials on a government paid trip to Hawaii is an appropriate use of resources when they are unable (or possibly unwilling) to investigate sex crimes in their jurisdiction.