It's this pro-feminine bias that keeps abortion legal.  Polls indicate that most American disapprove of abortion ... except that they do not want to infringe upon these precious snowflakes' "right to choose".

How are women who have multiple abortions any different than any serial killer who has had the opprobrium of society and the law piled on him  ... and yet they strut about in society holding their heads up high.  And, yet, even female serial killers are treated differently than males.  Look at Andrea Yates.  Ah, the poor woman who just cracked under the pressures of motherhood.  If a man had done the same thing, he would have been written off as a perverse demon.

And this bias in favor of women criminals is the direct result of the complete effeminization of men.

The ruling in Alabama exemplifies why only men should be in government and make laws, not women.

One could even blame Jesus Christ himself for exonerating the woman caught in adultery and not stoning her to death.

The oldest profession in history is far less an offense to God than killing babies.

Remember, Jesus said it would be better for a person to have a millstone around his neck and be cast into the sea, if he scandalizes a child. Even worse will happen to a person who murders a baby or unborn baby, especially when the baby is robbed of getting baptized.

I wonder if this is true, that people having more sympathy for women than men is a result of male effeminization. It could be mere empathy and sympathy for the weaker sex who is loved without understanding that the consequences of this for society would be bad.

This is my guess, as i've not studied it, but I think history would show that women who commit heinous crimes usually would not be sent to prison but to insane asylums or similar.  In the past, it was so unusual, since it's so anti-feminine, that even the women who were more logical and violent were able to hide behind typical feminine emotions and "play dumb" and act like they were crazy.  When in reality, they were stone-cold, psychopathic killers.  But this is a very, very unique woman.
.
In our modern day, once women were given the chance to vote, the call for equality has been growing and getting louder.  Certainly, this plays a part in all of this.  Another aspect is that politicians don't want to alienate 50% of their voters, so they go as far as they can, but not all the way.  Another aspect is that men, even effiminate men, still properly view women as potential emotional timebombs, who deserve to some extent sympathy for their low rational threshhold.  How many men have witnessed a women spiral out of control emotionally, yet not commit violence?  There's a fine line sometimes between temporary insanity and then acting upon such insanity.  With the lack of grace and spiritual fortitude today, such lines are being crossed more easily than ever.  Most women have been told they can take care of themselves.  Is it any wonder they make such bad decisions on their own?
.
I agree that women should be charged with murder but many get an abortion in a state of stress, and the higher problem is the system - the doctors, nurses and clinics who satanically talk these women into it, treat the murder as if it is "healthy" and "natural", and the woman gets to do all of this, mostly for free, in a "caring" environment, with people who surround them with attention.  Many of these women have no love in their life, because they don't have God, religion or a proper family.  So when they get pregnant, they freak out.  I'm not saying it's right, just giving the human mindset.
.
With all of these laws, you have to have baby steps.  These women are addicted to the system, addicted to bad relationships, addicted to poor life choices.  Much like stopping drug crimes, you go after the drug pushers and traffickers first.  If you destroy the system/supply, you stop the illegal activity.  All of these laws are imaginary anways, until the Supreme Court overrules Roe v Wade.  This was the design of the law - to get the Supreme Court to return this decision to the states.

So they it's OK to murder once, but serial murderers should be criminally liable?  Sorry, but even a single act of murder should be considered a criminal act by the state.

It is never okay to commit the sin of abortion. The woman who is complicit in the act of abortion, but who is NOT being forced into an abortion, is guilty of murder.

However, there are many women who use abortion as a form of birth control, or who use an abortifacent birth control drug. Those who use abortifacent birth control (pill, implant, or IUD) are guilty of repeated abortions, they are just as guilty as those who repeatedly visit PP to have their babies murdered.

The morning after pill needs to outlawed. Contraception is just as wicked as abortion.

Rarely is a woman "forced" to have an abortion; that's usually after-the-fact rationalization from women who subsequently developed guilty consciences about it.

Pressure?  Yes, I'm sure that happens all the time.  But forced?  I'm sure that happens from time to time, but it's much more rare.

In any case, you would treat this like any murder case.  If these other people (e.g. men) materially participated, then they should be tried as accomplices.  If they tried to persuade her to do it, they could be accessories or conspirators in murder.  If a woman were forced to such a degree that it was no longer a free act, then of course she could be found not guilty.  But, despite the outward fear and pressure, sin is still sin if there's any element of free will left.  So, for instance, those who apostasize under threat of death or torture, still commit a sin; it's merely that the gravity of the sin in God's eyes may be extenuated due to these external pressures.

I agree with you to a point.

However, there have been studies done showing that women and girls are often forced or convinced to have an abortion by their mothers, dads, schoolmates, boyfriends, lovers, doctors, nurses, teachers, etc.

All those who convince/force a scared new mother into having an abortion are accomplices. If these accomplices do not confess their sins, they will suffer hell fire.

When I was in college, a scared young Catholic college coed came to me because she knew I was strong in the faith. She told me that all her friends were trying to force her to have an abortion, but she knew that she would be strengthened by me into choosing life.

Unfortunately, when she was nine months pregnant, a doctor prescribed a known abortifacent antibiotic for an infection, when other less dangerous antibiotics were available. Unknowingly, she took the medicine. She lost the baby within five days. Doctors wanted her to go to an abortuary, but she refused as she wanted nature to take its course. In addition, she had heard that several doctors had falsely said that babies were dead in utero, when they were still alive.

Throughout her pregnancy, she came to me for advice as I was the only one she could trust. Upon my recommendation, she gave the child a Christian burial after baptizing him conditionally immediately following his stillborn birth. My husband and I were there for his funeral and burial. In the small coffin, the child looked normal in every way. He looked like he had just fallen asleep.

Judaism itself is not pro-life. There are individual "scholars" (it's cognitive dissonance in religious doctrine, worse than Protestantism) who are, but most of them believe what the тαℓмυd believes: that before the 40th day, the fetus is "just water" and not really human. 

The more liberal Jєωs have no morals, period.