Hundreds of “Black Vest” Migrants Seize Terminal in Paris Airport:
“France does not belong to the French!”
Yesterday, hundreds of undocumented migrants took control of Terminal 2 of the Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris France. Approximately 500 migrants seized the terminal. [....]
It's obvious that those arrogantly hostile "migrants"
no longer care about blowing away sympathetic delusions among their liberal supporters: The action as reported certainly doesn't seem like an effort by the starving rag-clothed widows & ophans promoted by the mainstream-media as the typical "migrants". Nor do those "migrants" care about further angering their opponents who understand that the alleged "migrants" are really invaders
: Predominately healthy well-fed young men
, who fundamentally do not
belong in Europe at all.
A nation that had any guts [×] would treat involvement in such a hostile action as permanent disqualification
for continued residency, and sufficient cause for immediate deportation
. Riot police ought to be authorized to immobilize (e.g., tear-gas) then arrest the obvious offenders (whose "black vests" ought to be treated as uniforms
of a hostile force). France might have an operational advantage with its Napoleonic legal system, which I've repeatedly seen summarized as "guilty until proven innocent
And when time's available, go arrest not only any alleged family who accompanied them, but also any of "migrant" birth in France. At any time when the French civilian police aren't adequate to the "migrant" opposition (e.g., the infamous no-go zones
), feel free to use military troops
experience or training. The genuinely French people need to learn to accept a cost of recovering their own country that includes many people being hurt and many things being broken.
But to where
might such "migrants" be deported
? It seems a safe bet that their native countries would refuse to repatriate them. It's regrettable that there are no longer any "desert islands" available within a reasonably tractable distance from France. For pretty much any island that's geographically suitable, powerful tourism interests, environmental-protectionist or real-estate interests, not to mention local residents
of centuries standing
, would prevent local placement of detention centers. And except for meddlesome nonlocal enviros, one can hardly blame them. Nowadays, any island that has its own water supply in a climate that's at least marginally hospitable also (almost certainly) has a native population, and nowadays, perhaps a local economy heavily dependent on tourism.
Note ×: There are numerous U.S. tombstones in France attesting to the inability of France to win any military conflicts since the days of Napoleon [××]. And despite his leadership, their victories were reversed after a few decades.
Note ××: Many United Statesians are ignorant of the FrancoPrussian War (1870--1871), which was France's only major war between the Napoleonic Wars and World War I: Its result was a surprising defeat on its own soil
for favored France, and a major victory for the underdog Prussian monarchy leading various German states; all of that was practically decided in the war's first few months. It also gave Italian revolutionaries an opportunity to capture Rome from papal rule (Pius IX) without intervention by the pope's French allies, who were then unavailable to provide their usual assistance. But students in the U.S.A. are kept busy instead with, um, selected "history" of the aftermath of the U.S. "Civil War", notably "Reconstruction" (1865--1876).