I'm listening to a lecture on philosophy and the "laws of nature", and it's more modernist nonsense. That is the commonplace way of obligation today. Mr. Professor says at one point, "what makes something a law of nature is how we handle it". That's false ... as though what makes infinite regress false, for example, is how we handle it.
How we handle laws of nature may determine various outcomes, but how we handle such and such circuмstances doesn't make it a law. Nature already is, and so are signs which are of nature. Signs already are, and people have and derive obligations based on the signs they inhabit. If Dugin is another diabolical fool, who chooses to play crooked dice under the sign of "Scorpio", so to speak, to give his "Duginism" a specific reference for its character, then that's where he has his obligations. Duginism really just obliges a certain character and sign of deception. Once one is able to reckon the form of the sign, that resolves the excess of information, and in that regard I reckon Dugin is a Satanist.