What you are actually saying is that it's best to sit home and not vote, thereby allowing the Communist and the CCP pederast win the election.
Hope it's worth it to you to pat yourself on the back and feel morally superior.
Yet another dishonest argument. Nobody is making this case to "feel morally superior". I don't like being attacked for my position, whether it's this or some of the other unpopular ones I hold. Most of us are attempting to discern God's truth so that we can do His will and please Him ... and because we love the truth, and, in my case, because error causes me pain. This is a completely unwarranted attack on people by judging their intentions in the internal forum as being motivated by pride. It's also a fallacious pseudo-argument, claiming that the only reason we're taking this position is being motivated by some "pride" or Pharisaical "feeling" of "moral superiority". Hogwash. It's quite the opposite, where it's YOU who are clearly emoting. You keep hurling nonsense like this out there, whereas I have very clearly articulated my argument based on Catholic principles of moral theology. You have never even come CLOSE to even attempting this. You simply emote, hurl accusations like the above, or accusations that people are lying when citing well-known and easily provable negatives about Trump, etc.
You may even have noticed that when one poster stated that he was voting for Trump under his application of "double effect," I did not argue much with him, just mildly expressing a simple disagreement.
You went so far as to slanderously assert that hαɾɾιs is MY candidate ... exhibiting again the fact that your mind is crippled by false dichotomy, which is precisely what the controllers like to do with their Hegelian dialectic. If you're against Trump, that means you're FOR hαɾɾιs. Ridiculous. How about that I'm against both of them and I refuse to participate in the election of either one.
Let's say that I am captured by an evil terrorist who tells me that I must murder an innocent person and that if I don't do it, he's going to set off a nuclear bomb and kill millions. I actually saw this scenario on a TV show, "24". So, a Catholic cannot murder that innocent person. Period. But, based on your absurd reasoning, you would accuse this Catholic man who REFUSED to commit the evil of being guilty of murdering those millions who then died of the nuclear bomb, right? You're saying absolutely the same thing, that if we do not commit an evil, we're responsible for what happens by NOT committing the evil. Similarly, let's say I were a Catholic doctor who refused to perform an abortion even while this poor young girl, impregnated by an incestuous rape, begged me to do it. Shortly thereafter, the young girl, so distraught, commits ѕυιcιdє. By your logic, you'd accuse me of being guilty of her murder. What you're claiming here is the same thing. IF an action is evil, then we cannot do it, even if it is to prevent some greater evil, and by not doing it, no, we are NOT responsible for the evil that results. If I refuse to murder that innocent man, I am NOT guilty of the murder of millions, and if I refuse to perform the abortion, I am NOT guilty of the girls' ѕυιcιdє. If I do kill the innocent man, then I AM guilty of that, or if I perform the abortion, I AM guilty of that.
This is not very difficult. You cannot do evil even to prevent greater evil, and in refusing to commit said evil, one is NOT guilty of the greater evil that results. Period. End of Story.
So your only argument can be that voting for Trump is not evil (and explain why). If it is evil, then it doesn't matter if he's running against Satan himself. You can't vote for him. It's that simple.
Topic: A Great Chastisement Will Come for Embracing the Culture of Death (Read 4324 times)