https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=97&v=Kc1lGqIGYSA

9/11, links to Israel, the mossad, and the crime within a crime is all discussed with Christopher Bollyn in an uncensored discussion with Sean Stone. The disposal of evidence, promotion of a scripted story, and how Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu are involved, plus the accusation of anti-semitism levelled against those that explore the connection to the Israeli government and intelligence are all explored. Who profited from the operation, fαℓѕє fℓαgs, and the mysterious influence of the Saudis and British are demystified in this full length episode of Buzzsaw.

GUEST BIO:
Christopher Bollyn is an American journalist who has investigated the events of 9-11. He helped Professor Steven E. Jones in the spring and summer of 2006, when Jones found solid evidence of Thermite in the dust of the Twin Towers. The discovery and discussion of Thermite in the demolition of the World Trade Center led to serious trouble for both Jones and Bollyn.

The summer of his arrest he was attending an SSPX chapel in Chicago

… The summer of [Bollyn's] arrest he was attending an SSPX chapel in Chicago.

Really? Can this claim be reliably attested to? Note that Bollyn is now quite hostile to the Faith. Among other things, he has written extensively on the scholar and heretical priest William Tyndale (c. 1494-1536), an important name in the history of biblical scholarship for his English translations of the New Testament, the Pentateuch, and several other Old Testament books. Tyndale left England in a hurry because his outspoken support for the teachings of the Protestant "Reformers," Zwingli especially, got him into dangerously hot water with Henry VIII (then still in his "Defensor fidei" period). After several debates with Catholic apologists, including Thomas More, Tyndale was arrested in Antwerp and subsequently executed under the all-too-common gruesome circuмstances of that age.

Bollyn's interest in Tyndale is not one scholar's interest in the work of another. For Bollyn, Tyndale's fate represents all that Bollyn sees as wrong about the Church both then and subsequently. Such wrongheadedness need not be seen as entirely negating the worth of his opinions about 9/11, Jєωιѕн and Israeli perfidy, and various other matters. Yet with the ongoing program (of Jєωιѕн and US government origin) to subvert and distort the so-called Truther movement, which purports to debunk the Establishment narrative of 9/11 and—as at least one of its wings wishes to do—reveal Jєωιѕн influence generally and its leading role in the crimes of 9/11 and the subsequent and ongoing wars against "terrorism" (rather, against any and all enemies of Jєωιѕн world rule), one needs to exercise great care before signing on unreservedly to the platform or claims of one faction or another. That caution certainly applies to Bollyn and his ally, Dr. Stephen Jones, whose thermite theory of the twin towers' destruction has been denounced as an unsupportable fiction and a willful distraction from the events' true cause by other Truther groups.

A very fair and well presented comment, claudel.

Pardon my faulty memory (+ lack of time to verify at the moment), wasn't Tyndale also very influential in the apostasy of Cromwell who, in turn, then contributed to Henry VIII's break from Rome, and was significant in advancing the reformation?

Thank you, dear lady.

Cromwell and Tyndale were in close contact and were certainly in sympathy with each other's aims. My own largely offhand recollection is that Cromwell was the more aggressive of the pair, but I wouldn't swear to that absent reference to my source materials. So your statement of the case might easily be closer to the truth.

As to Henry, I remain skeptical as to whether he ever did anything under the influence of others. I don't doubt that having a son to succeed him was a central concern of his, but I remain unpersuaded that this biological drive involved any concern for the good of those he governed, even less any concern for the truths of religion. Call me jaundiced, but I incline to think that he was as cynical in his profession of belief in the True Faith as he later became in his self-serving doubts about it.

Very few monarchs down through the ages would have disagreed, I think, with that old Mel Brooks line "It's good to be king," Henry perhaps even less so than most.