Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So I've decided that I can't vote for Romney. I'm done pretending that there is any significant difference between the two parties. So my choices are stay home or vote for Gary Johnson.Now I know the official Libertarian platform is pro-"choice" which is the one caveat here. I honestly don't think that abortion will ever be illegal in this country barring a chastisement; and I certainly don't think any Republican president is going to do anything about it. We had two terms of Reagan, Bush I, two terms of Bush II and abortion remained legal all the while.The Libertarian Party calls for an end to all public funding for Planned Parenthood which would do more to limit abortion then anything a Republican president has done. Can one vote for such a candidate/platform?Anybody else here thinking of voting for Gary Johnson?
If you're going to make a protest vote for someone who will never be elected, it had better reflect your moral views, not some abstract political theory.
Quote from: Roland DeschainQuote from: TelesphorusIf you're going to make a protest vote for someone who will never be elected, it had better reflect your moral views, not some abstract political theory.Unfortunately there is no Catholic Monarchist Party :scratchchin:I'll probably just stay home.It's better to vote Constitution if they are seriously pro-life in their rhetoric, because they recognize natural law and the actual law. However it probably won't make any difference.The last Constitution party candidate, Chuck Baldwin, had a great essay about "a wasted vote."Voting for the loser is, in some sense, a wasted vote, especially if it was a "lesser of two evils" vote.I think people who typically vote Republican in states like California and New York should start voting third party when the issue of the election is not in doubt.
Quote from: TelesphorusIf you're going to make a protest vote for someone who will never be elected, it had better reflect your moral views, not some abstract political theory.Unfortunately there is no Catholic Monarchist Party :scratchchin:I'll probably just stay home.
Quote from: Roland DeschainAnybody else here thinking of voting for Gary Johnson? I couldn't recommend that. I don't know much about the man, but a quick glace at his Wikipedia page states that he supports "same-sex marriage", abortion, and that he found the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" to be "long overdue".
Anybody else here thinking of voting for Gary Johnson?
Quote from: TelesphorusQuote from: Roland DeschainQuote from: TelesphorusIf you're going to make a protest vote for someone who will never be elected, it had better reflect your moral views, not some abstract political theory.Unfortunately there is no Catholic Monarchist Party :scratchchin:I'll probably just stay home.It's better to vote Constitution if they are seriously pro-life in their rhetoric, because they recognize natural law and the actual law. However it probably won't make any difference.The last Constitution party candidate, Chuck Baldwin, had a great essay about "a wasted vote."Voting for the loser is, in some sense, a wasted vote, especially if it was a "lesser of two evils" vote.I think people who typically vote Republican in states like California and New York should start voting third party when the issue of the election is not in doubt.Telesphorus,I am not familiar with the Constitution party. I will google them, but can you suggest anything specific that I should read?
Wouldn't it be just a little odd to form a party to advocate VOTING for a Catholic monarchy?