Well, it's hard to tell about these things.
First off, this person, in my opinion, has a male skull. Sometimes it's hard to tell, but in this case it is very obvious. (I've studied forensics enough to recognize it pretty well.)
Presenting as the sex opposite of one's skeleton (God only made two) is extremely common in the msm media and in the "truther" and alt right media as well. (They play both sides!)
It doesn't necessarily mean they are altering facts, but if somebody is being deceptive about their sex, then they are not adverse to deception.
Second, they said that cytosine comes from meteorites. A quick search shows:
Cytosine (C) and thymine (T), however, are absent in meteorites, making the emergence of an RNA and later RNA/DNA/protein world problematic. https://twitter.com/phuromnee/status/1617790922590392320With regards to the number of genes from each parent, scientists do not agree on the number of genes we have:Bets on the number of genes ranged from more than 312,000 to just under 26,000, with an average of around 40,000.https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05462-wSo while the shots are gene editing and reverse transcription can change DNA
the 72,000 number is not accurate for the math equation which they used to come up with the 666.
As for the triple helix part, I know they have been working on that but I would look into the actual patents to verify if they used that technology already in these shots.
Also, I'm not sure the Tetragrammaton in our DNA works because I've seen the letters arranged differently:
The video says:
ATCG
The Human Genome Research Project says:
ACGT
Topic: What do you think about it? (Read 674 times)