Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Health and Nutrition => Topic started by: SeanJohnson on October 17, 2021, 10:43:45 AM
-
October 16, 2021 | [color=rgba(86,23,29,var(--tw-text-opacity))]Sundance (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/author/admin/)[/iurl] | [color=rgba(86,23,29,var(--tw-text-opacity))]807 Comments[/color] (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/16/did-klaus-schwab-and-world-economic-forum-admit-the-covid-vaccine-injects-traceable-markers-their-promoted-covid-pass-blood-test-requires-them/#comments)[/font][/size][/font][/size][/color]
An [color=rgba(86,23,29,var(--tw-text-opacity))]article (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/covid-19-passport-app-health-travel-covidpass-quarantine-event/)[/url]and video promoted by the World Economic Forum, intended to propose and outline a globally accepted “COVIDPass”, actually reveals stunning background admissions. [[color=rgba(86,23,29,var(--tw-text-opacity))]Article Here[/color] (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/covid-19-passport-app-health-travel-covidpass-quarantine-event/) – VIDEO Below]
The basic premise of the proposal is for a global COVIDPass that will be universally accepted permitting vaccinated people to travel around the world and enter all venues and facilities that require proof of vaccine. However, there is something in the proposal that tells a story all by itself. First, WATCH the Video:
.
Don’t get caught up in the esoteric weeds about the COVID passport angle of this; and don’t let yourself focus on the vaxxed vs non-vaxxed aspect. Additionally, for now do not focus on the privacy aspects or the issues with tracing or tracking. Instead, focus like a laser on something far more critical in the background of the proposal itself.
The entire premise of the World Economic Forum’s “COVIDPass” is predicated on a blood test being able to identify whether a person has been vaccinated or not.
Think about that carefully.
Think about that deeply.
Right now, all vaccination ID’s, all COVID passports, are dependent on a registration process that takes place at the time of vaccination within each nation’s unique healthcare system:
(1) You get vaccinated, you get registered in a system that shows you have been vaccinated; and that’s how you eventually get to a place where you establish a linked “QR” code to the vaccination registration -most commonly on your cell phone- that grants you permitted access at checkpoints or gateways.
-OR-
(2) You get vaccinated, you get registered in a system that shows you have been vaccinated; and you are given a paper vaccination card to carry on your person that grants you permitted access at checkpoints or gateways.
(https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/cth-QR-code-2.jpg)Those are essentially the only two registration systems for COVID passports currently in place. Both of them are dependent on registration with the healthcare system or provider who then grants you the paper ID; or triggers the authorization process to connect your vaccination status to a system where you download the QR code.
Regardless of which process is followed, the registration is with the healthcare system.
What the World Economic Forum (WEF) is describing is NOT that…. and this is the critical point.
The WEF proposal is based on a blood sample, or a blood test, to prove you have been vaccinated. The only way that is possible is if the vaccine itself carries some form of marker that permanently stays (at a cellular level) in your body which can then be detected in a blood test.
If the vaccine does not leave an identifiable marker or imprint in your blood, then a blood test for vaccinated status would not be possible.
If you understand that critical point, then keep reading. If you don’t understand the significance of that point, then it’s best to just quit right here.
♦ If you were to go into a doctors office, blood lab or hospital right now and tell them you needed a blood test to prove you have been vaccinated, they would look at you like you’re a crazy person. Their response would be for you to contact your healthcare provider -where the vaccine shot was given- to get the verification or duplicate authentication you would need to prove you have been vaccinated.
Yet somehow the World Economic Forum knows of a process for testing blood to see if the vaccine is present?
Think about that.
Let’s call whatever is in your blood system a “marker“, because generically we do not know what they would specifically be looking for to isolate blood as vaccinated -vs- non vaccinated. They are looking for something, so let’s call that a marker. That means the following points are evident:[/font][/size][/color]
- Whatever that marker is, has to be present in all versions of the vaccine.
- Whatever that marker is, has to be present permanently.
- Whatever that marker is, was known by the World Economic Forum to exist prior to this proposal.
Without a way to identify vaccinated blood, the entire premise of the COVIDPass proposed by the WEF is moot.
So, the question becomes: what is that marker?
Without extrapolating into conspiracy theory or suspicious imaginings, the basic point to drive home from this WEF proposal is their awareness of a blood test that can guarantee you have been vaccinated. [The next step, where your blood test is linked to your unique identification for authenticity in society, is another kettle of fish altogether.]
COMMON SENSE – Factually it would defeat the entire premise of the COVIDPass as outlined if your unique id was not being traced/tracked.
If, as an example, I were to use your cell phone QR code at the boarding gate of an international flight, there would have to be some cross referenced database that pulls up your unique identification in order to stop me from traveling under your vaccinated status.
Under the concept of a globally accepted, bloodline-authenticated vaccination ID, there has to be a central database from which your vaccination identification -your blood- was registered to your specific personage. But that’s going further into the future.
For now, it is worth noting that in mid-2020, even before the various vaccine’s deployed in clinical trials, the World Economic Forum knew that a blood test for a COVID vaccination was the best scenario for vaccine passport identification. [[color=rgba(86,23,29,var(--tw-text-opacity))]Article Here (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/covid-19-passport-app-health-travel-covidpass-quarantine-event/)[/url]]
Thoughts?[/font][/size][/color]
-
Yes, it is surely possible today, just by noting polluted blood in the jabbed (recall blood centers not allowing jabbed to donate blood?).
It’s the mark.
-
Yes, it is surely possible today, just by noting polluted blood in the jabbed (recall blood centers not allowing jabbed to donate blood?).
It’s the mark.
https://www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/dlp/coronavirus--covid-19--and-blood-donation.html (https://www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/dlp/coronavirus--covid-19--and-blood-donation.html)
-
Yes, it is surely possible today, just by noting polluted blood in the jabbed (recall blood centers not allowing jabbed to donate blood?).
It’s the mark.
Blood? Not hand or forehead?
-
Blood? Not hand or forehead?
Give them time. They’ll get there. They’ll probably scan the forehead to pick up on the luciferace in the jab.
-
Most anti vaxxers reject Catholicism. The jab can't be the mark.
-
Most anti vaxxers reject Catholicism. The jab can't be the mark.
Logical fallacy.
-
Logical fallacy.
Please, explain why.
-
Please, explain why.
Firstly, you have not supplied any evidence to support your assertion that most anti-vaxers reject Catholicism (ie., it is gratuitous);
Secondly, you draw a conclusion from your undemonstrated premise (ie., therefore “the jab can’t be the mark.”);
Thirdly, even if your premise was true, your conclusion does not follow (for a number of reasons):
1) The jab is not a vaccine;
2) Many anti-vaxers love the jab;
3) By your logic, the fact that most trads are anti-vaxers means the jab is the mark.
-
Yes, it is surely possible today, just by noting polluted blood in the jabbed (recall blood centers not allowing jabbed to donate blood?).
It’s the mark.
Taking a blood test is too much work. It would have to be something else that can be detected electronically. That's where Gates was going with his subcutaneous luciferase tag. Interestingly, a recent Pfizer whistleblower says that the Pfizer jab contains luciferase.
-
Taking a blood test is too much work. It would have to be something else that can be detected electronically. That's where Gates was going with his subcutaneous luciferase tag. Interestingly, a recent Pfizer whistleblower says that the Pfizer jab contains luciferase.
The blood test will just be an interim measure, transferring from paper and electronic proof of compliance, to biological proof. Everything must proceed in steps and increments so too much alarm and resistance is not raised.
Much too overt just to start tattooing foreheads.
Eventually, it will be a scan to detect the Lucifer in you.
-
Agree that a blood test reveals how "poisoned" a person is.
Jim Condit unsuccessfully tried to have the hospital that was treating his daughter test her blood clotting index.
The medical staff refused his request, knowing the test would reveal the vax was causing micro-vascular blood clots.
But the first generation vaxes are for mass depopulation of the goyim.
Once the Kabbalists have the herd reduced and under tighter control, then they'll start marking hands & foreheads.
-
Firstly, you have not supplied any evidence to support your assertion that most anti-vaxers reject Catholicism (ie., it is gratuitous);
Secondly, you draw a conclusion from your undemonstrated premise (ie., therefore “the jab can’t be the mark.”);
Thirdly, even if your premise was true, your conclusion does not follow (for a number of reasons):
1) The jab is not a vaccine;
2) Many anti-vaxers love the jab;
3) By your logic, the fact that most trads are anti-vaxers means the jab is the mark.
The jab is sinful no doubt, but I do not believe it is the mark because no one on the world stage today fits all the criteria of the Antichrist. For example, Bill Gates may meet the criteria of being a charismatic personality, but he has never shown the capacity to be a military leader, let alone the kind skillful enough to subdue the kingdoms in the manner which is foretold in Scripture. Moreover, none of these bad actors are claiming to actually be Christ, although they are spreading a message of liberal universalism intended to subvert and replace the universal morality that Christ gave us. Since the Antichrist will be the one to create and administer the mark, this can’t be it.
-
The jab is sinful no doubt, but I do not believe it is the mark because no one on the world stage today fits all the criteria of the Antichrist. For example, Bill Gates may meet the criteria of being a charismatic personality, but he has never shown the capacity to be a military leader, let alone the kind skillful enough to subdue the kingdoms in the manner which is foretold in Scripture. Moreover, none of these bad actors are claiming to actually be Christ, although they are spreading a message of liberal universalism intended to subvert and replace the universal morality that Christ gave us. Since the Antichrist will be the one to create and administer the mark, this can’t be it.
Hmm. Interesting point.
-
Firstly, you have not supplied any evidence to support your assertion that most anti-vaxers reject Catholicism (ie., it is gratuitous);
Secondly, you draw a conclusion from your undemonstrated premise (ie., therefore “the jab can’t be the mark.”);
Thirdly, even if your premise was true, your conclusion does not follow (for a number of reasons):
1) The jab is not a vaccine;
2) Many anti-vaxers love the jab;
3) By your logic, the fact that most trads are anti-vaxers means the jab is the mark.
As far as I understand St. John's Apocalypse, all those, who don't receive the mark of the beast, are "written in the book" (i.e. will finally belong to the Church triumphant). Consequently, there can be not even one non-Catholic, who doesn't receive the mark of the beast. But that's not what can be observed in many places. There are all sorts of folks who reject Christ and his Church, and also reject what you identify as the mark of the beast.
-
That's a really good point about the blood showing not immunity but who has been vaxxed.
They don't care about immunity or health anyway.
Just want everyone to take the mark.
I agree that it starts here and continues incrementally to the hand/head thing.
I always wondered how it would be possible to fool people with the mark of the beast since it will be so obvious if it's on the hand and head. Well it's becoming more clear. That and the strong delusion that God sends.
The WEF video states the results will be tracked on blockchain.
Part of your permanent record like everything else that will be tracked by blockchain and how they will allot your crypto currency.
The Lifesite report from Israel relayed a story of an OBgyn who told a patient after examining her that she was unvaxxed. He could tell just by the examination. Unconfirmed hearsay, but interesting.