So Jones shilling for the Jєωs again?

I've read that these numbers / stats are lies.  Let dig around for where I saw that.

^^^Dude in the suit is a Jєω :)

I've been considering the objection raised by a forum member regarding the disturbing footage of people dying. They think that footage is unnecessary and harmful to the mind.

I am of the opinion that the footage is extremely important, as it is presented to us by the Peters team as probative evidence.

If we were jurors in the long awaited trial against the alchemy industry, we would have to sit through many disturbing and graphic presentations.

Do we wish to be rational observers and thinkers, or emotional cripples?

I played some of that footage multiple times, and not to gratify some morbid curiosity. Rather I needed to look multiple times because there was no other way to make the proper observations.

Stew Peters is a shock jock whose ouvre is decidedly sensationalist and misleading - on a good day.

One thing he did, which is unforgiveable, is assault the senses with a rapid-fire montage of grisly footage. A no no in the rational demonstration world.

Another thing he did is entirely fail to provide expository commentary on the footage - most especially reveal the sources from which he obtained this stuff. A no no in the rational demonstration world.

Another thing he did is make it almost impossible to study the footage, as footage, because of the rapid fire succession of images. This is normally done to prevent rational consideration, and rather create deep sense impressions that cause instant phantasms that excite the passions. In other words, this film technique is consistent with any attempt to put the intellect to sleep.

In a court of law, all photographic evidence (really all physical and docuмentary evidence) must be submitted to a chain of custody test before being admitted. Chain of custody in law is sacrosanct.

Stew fed us footage that would never be released by the MSM in the USSA. Clearly this footage came from Asia, and it is not unreasonable to suspect that it came from China.

The footage - down to the image, if I recall correctly - comes from surveillance cameras on train platforms, buses, and businesses. The footage belongs either to the government or to the business owners. Therefore permission must be obtained from the owners to acquire the footage; or it may be subpoenaed for trial by lawyers (wherein it falls under rules of strictest confidentiality).

Where did StewCo get this footage from? I want to know, because if I am not told, I will conclude that the probative value of said footage is very low. Are we to believe the CCP gave it to him out of their desire to serve humanity? Did Chinese business owners/whistleblowers sneak it to him and him alone? For have we seen these images anywhere else?

My mind cannot accede to his demand to believe him on such a shoddy evidentiary foundation.

Another forum member made a comment about the strange twirling and hand-batting sequence with several of the victims. I recall the man in what seemed to be a bank; the man on the train platform; the woman doing nails; a man in a store. That man looked caucasian. The comment was that these people seemed to see something, to be menaced by something. I had the same thought. 

Again a proper demonstration is necessary to make a judgement about what was presented. Is this normal in strokes? Were these strokes? Epileptic seizures? 

Stew doesn't care to provide us with a medical expert who can explain the phenomenon.

Wherefore the docuмentary as a whole is, compared to a proper court trial, the evidentiary equivalent of a third grader running home to tell you what happened at school. 

P.S. The evidence with the highest probative value, I thought, was that given by the funeral directors. Many of them identified themselves, and provided both verbal and graphic evidence (sufficient for a docuмentary, but not for a court of law, of course).

On the whole, I do believe that the embalmers are docuмenting serious abnormalities in the bodies of clot shot victims, beginning in 2021. That is real evidence, most certainly enough to satisfy probable cause - in other words enough to arrest and indict.

Let's hope Stew has good motives, zero skill, inflated ego, and a tendency to extreme sensationalism. Let's hope he's not in the pay of a nefarious entity. That he is backed by big money is clear. But who?   

And who gave him that footage? The unidentified source problem bothers me - a lot.

And also, has anyone here seen this footage anywhere else? 

I've been considering the objection raised by a forum member regarding the disturbing footage of people dying. They think that footage is unnecessary and harmful to the mind.

I am of the opinion that the footage is extremely important, as it is presented to us by the Peters team as probative evidence.

If we were jurors in the long awaited trial against the alchemy industry, we would have to sit through many disturbing and graphic presentations.

Do we wish to be rational observers and thinkers, or emotional cripples?

I played some of that footage multiple times, and not to gratify some morbid curiosity. Rather I needed to look multiple times because there was no other way to make the proper observations.

Stew Peters is a shock jock whose ouvre is decidedly sensationalist and misleading - on a good day.

One thing he did, which is unforgiveable, is assault the senses with a rapid-fire montage of grisly footage. A no no in the rational demonstration world.

Another thing he did is entirely fail to provide expository commentary on the footage - most especially reveal the sources from which he obtained this stuff. A no no in the rational demonstration world.

Another thing he did is make it almost impossible to study the footage, as footage, because of the rapid fire succession of images. This is normally done to prevent rational consideration, and rather create deep sense impressions that cause instant phantasms that excite the passions. In other words, this film technique is consistent with any attempt to put the intellect to sleep.

In a court of law, all photographic evidence (really all physical and docuмentary evidence) must be submitted to a chain of custody test before being admitted. Chain of custody in law is sacrosanct.

Stew fed us footage that would never be released by the MSM in the USSA. Clearly this footage came from Asia, and it is not unreasonable to suspect that it came from China.

The footage - down to the image, if I recall correctly - comes from surveillance cameras on train platforms, buses, and businesses. The footage belongs either to the government or to the business owners. Therefore permission must be obtained from the owners to acquire the footage; or it may be subpoenaed for trial by lawyers (wherein it falls under rules of strictest confidentiality).

Where did StewCo get this footage from? I want to know, because if I am not told, I will conclude that the probative value of said footage is very low. Are we to believe the CCP gave it to him out of their desire to serve humanity? Did Chinese business owners/whistleblowers sneak it to him and him alone? For have we seen these images anywhere else?

My mind cannot accede to his demand to believe him on such a shoddy evidentiary foundation.

Another forum member made a comment about the strange twirling and hand-batting sequence with several of the victims. I recall the man in what seemed to be a bank; the man on the train platform; the woman doing nails; a man in a store. That man looked caucasian. The comment was that these people seemed to see something, to be menaced by something. I had the same thought. 

Again a proper demonstration is necessary to make a judgement about what was presented. Is this normal in strokes? Were these strokes? Epileptic seizures? 

Stew doesn't care to provide us with a medical expert who can explain the phenomenon.

Wherefore the docuмentary as a whole is, compared to a proper court trial, the evidentiary equivalent of a third grader running home to tell you what happened at school. 

P.S. The evidence with the highest probative value, I thought, was that given by the funeral directors. Many of them identified themselves, and provided both verbal and graphic evidence (sufficient for a docuмentary, but not for a court of law, of course).

On the whole, I do believe that the embalmers are docuмenting serious abnormalities in the bodies of clot shot victims, beginning in 2021. That is real evidence, most certainly enough to satisfy probable cause - in other words enough to arrest and indict.

Let's hope Stew has good motives, zero skill, inflated ego, and a tendency to extreme sensationalism. Let's hope he's not in the pay of a nefarious entity. That he is backed by big money is clear. But who?   

And who gave him that footage? The unidentified source problem bothers me - a lot.

And also, has anyone here seen this footage anywhere else?

Excellent points/questions.  Were there any credits at the end for any of the graphics, videos, etc?  I don't recall.  Are any of them available on the internet?   

Like you, I'm still thinking the big/real story are the postmortem clots.  They are VERY irregular, but again, how do we find out for sure? Of course, these same embalmers and funeral directors have other videos out that I have watched, so this docuмentary only puts them in one place.

I believe Stew Peters was some kind of wigger rapper before creating a new persona for himself as an Alt Right grifter, I mean commentator. 
That said, there have been numerous videos put out that irrefutably demonstrate something evil is in these vaccines, but I don't need to gaze into a high powered microscope to know that, one glance at Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla's face 
or  early life section on Wikipedia is sufficient.

This for me is top post on this subject. Right from the start different doctors have been saying two different things about Covid and their vaccine. How true then the expression doctors differ and patients die. What I would like to see is some of those pro-vac doctors drop dead. Only then would we see the truth.

I've seen reports about pro-vax doctors (they're usually doctors who don't actually doctor anymore and are "medical administrators") drop dead--I just can't tell you where I've seen the reports.  

On a personal note, the doctor I have to use (due to insurance reasons) is incredibly pro-vax but, while he will calmly explain all the benefits of vaccination and why I should not be concerned in the least about any vaccination and has told me that he got vaccinated as soon as it was available to him, accepts that people's "risk tolerance" are different and is accepting of patients who don't want the vaccine.  However, it does seem that he has greatly diminished his practice and he seems to be unavailable a lot.  Either he has lost patients for some reason or he is not able to see as many as he used to see.  Really don't know which.

I had to go to hospital in November last year. Three doctors came in to me when I refused the Covid Vax. I told them I refused on religious grounds, that cells of aborted babies are used to produce the vax so as a Catholic I could not take any part of such a use. They denied it but let me alone after that.

I had to start with a new primary care doctor last year who is also vax crazy, first on the agenda was get me vaxed and get a plethora of other shots for the flu and who knows what else. I simply said I will not get vaxed and never have and never will get flu and whatever other shots.

The doctor looked completely stunned and asked why. I told her my previous doctor and I agreed that as long as everyone else gets them there is no need for me to get them since they're protected from me and me from them. She didn't know how to answer that and pretty much just half confusedly accepted my decision.

Last summer I had my yearly physical and was asked by the nurse if I had been vaxxed.
My response was, "I'd rather not say."
When the doctor came in I was asked again by her
and gave the same answer. 
There must have been something about my expression or the way I said it
that immediately made them switch gears and drop the subject.
In many situations in life, especially in these times, the best answer is no answer
at all. 
You're not going to convince these people in a matter of a few minutes why
the entire medical establishment is wrong and corrupt, especially when they are part of it
so pick your battles wisely.