I've been considering the objection raised by a forum member regarding the disturbing footage of people dying. They think that footage is unnecessary and harmful to the mind.
I am of the opinion that the footage is extremely important, as it is presented to us by the Peters team as probative evidence.
If we were jurors in the long awaited trial against the alchemy industry, we would have to sit through many disturbing and graphic presentations.
Do we wish to be rational observers and thinkers, or emotional cripples?
I played some of that footage multiple times, and not to gratify some morbid curiosity. Rather I needed to look multiple times because there was no other way to make the proper observations.
Stew Peters is a shock jock whose ouvre is decidedly sensationalist and misleading - on a good day.
One thing he did, which is unforgiveable, is assault the senses with a rapid-fire montage of grisly footage. A no no in the rational demonstration world.
Another thing he did is entirely fail to provide expository commentary on the footage - most especially reveal the sources from which he obtained this stuff. A no no in the rational demonstration world.
Another thing he did is make it almost impossible to study the footage, as footage, because of the rapid fire succession of images. This is normally done to prevent rational consideration, and rather create deep sense impressions that cause instant phantasms that excite the passions. In other words, this film technique is consistent with any attempt to put the intellect to sleep.
In a court of law, all photographic evidence (really all physical and docuмentary evidence) must be submitted to a chain of custody test before being admitted. Chain of custody in law is sacrosanct.
Stew fed us footage that would never be released by the MSM in the USSA. Clearly this footage came from Asia, and it is not unreasonable to suspect that it came from China.
The footage - down to the image, if I recall correctly - comes from surveillance cameras on train platforms, buses, and businesses. The footage belongs either to the government or to the business owners. Therefore permission must be obtained from the owners to acquire the footage; or it may be subpoenaed for trial by lawyers (wherein it falls under rules of strictest confidentiality).
Where did StewCo get this footage from? I want to know, because if I am not told, I will conclude that the probative value of said footage is very low. Are we to believe the CCP gave it to him out of their desire to serve humanity? Did Chinese business owners/whistleblowers sneak it to him and him alone? For have we seen these images anywhere else?
My mind cannot accede to his demand to believe him on such a shoddy evidentiary foundation.
Another forum member made a comment about the strange twirling and hand-batting sequence with several of the victims. I recall the man in what seemed to be a bank; the man on the train platform; the woman doing nails; a man in a store. That man looked caucasian. The comment was that these people seemed to see something, to be menaced by something. I had the same thought.
Again a proper demonstration is necessary to make a judgement about what was presented. Is this normal in strokes? Were these strokes? Epileptic seizures?
Stew doesn't care to provide us with a medical expert who can explain the phenomenon.
Wherefore the docuмentary as a whole is, compared to a proper court trial, the evidentiary equivalent of a third grader running home to tell you what happened at school.
P.S. The evidence with the highest probative value, I thought, was that given by the funeral directors. Many of them identified themselves, and provided both verbal and graphic evidence (sufficient for a docuмentary, but not for a court of law, of course).
On the whole, I do believe that the embalmers are docuмenting serious abnormalities in the bodies of clot shot victims, beginning in 2021. That is real evidence, most certainly enough to satisfy probable cause - in other words enough to arrest and indict.
Let's hope Stew has good motives, zero skill, inflated ego, and a tendency to extreme sensationalism. Let's hope he's not in the pay of a nefarious entity. That he is backed by big money is clear. But who?
And who gave him that footage? The unidentified source problem bothers me - a lot.
And also, has anyone here seen this footage anywhere else?