Probably from someone who disagrees with the assertion that the "virus doesn't exist".
A charitable, rational assessment, but one that would be notably supported by an actual comment to that effect. Why not just say so? Without such a comment, it is just as rational, if not necessarily as charitable, to assume it is based upon personal issues/emotion. Such agents have been predictably active as of late (see my recent posts), as my limited free time has allowed me to post a bit more than I can when grinding out the busy, seasonal work-week.
I voted your post UP, as part of my new method is to counteract the Brainless/Gutless CI Cancel Brigade by Down-Thumbing all of them until Matthew's system stops me and UP-Thumbing every post I do not solidly disagree with. For over a decade (15 years?), I rarely used the feature,
which I called gαy since day one. I respond, rather than react like a mindless, chicken-shit fan-boy. However, now that Traddieland DBs and Wannabe-Trads are as they are, I intend to use the system to my advantage and the advantage of those of goodwill.