Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: TERRAIN The Film  (Read 1282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: TERRAIN The Film
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2022, 12:36:26 PM »
Someone with five hours?  Everyone with five hours?  Someone with an hour here, an hour there?

Do you pray?  Is prayer a worthy activity?  Do you make time to pray?  Do you make time to read good books, exercise your mind, body and/or soul?

If you don't want to watch the film or are not terribly interested in the subject matter, fine.  As it stands, your argument is meaningless and childish.  As adults, we ALL make time for whatever activities we deem useful or necessary.

[Skip to 4:20 if you decide to watch it.  It is worth watching from 4:20 until 3:30, if time is limited.  It makes a solid case that Cooties-19 is a complete hoax, generated via computerized skulduggery.]

You don't know my circuмstances.

And in any case, that is saying to me, or to anyone else, "take five hours out of your life, and do this".  You cannot "make time".  You can only take time away from other things, that is, to say "the way I was going to spend those five hours is not as important as this other thing, so I will blow that off, and do this instead".

I prefer to read, rather than to watch.  I can read something very lengthy, and read it quickly if I have to.  When one listens to a talk, or watches a video, there is no way to "speed it up" beyond 125% and retain intelligibility.

That's just me.  Other people may prefer watching and listening.

Re: TERRAIN The Film
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2022, 07:28:02 PM »
So, you didn't actually watch it?

Yes, I didn't actually watch much of it. Didn't I say so before?



But you thought you'd share your opinion about the film you didn't actually watch?

Exactly. And I didn't only think to share my opinon, but rather actually shared it.



Why should anyone care about your thoughts respecting a film you admit you didn't watch?

Because (at least attentive) CI members know that I am a "virus denier", and that I support the work of Dr. Stefan Lanka, and Andrew Kaufman MD ("confessed" Jєω), and Dr. Tom Cowan (Jєω "by name"), their work on the fact that no pathogenic virus has been proven to exist; and I wanted to share my assessment that it's not worth to watch the five hour film.


Anyway, thanks for taking the time to waste our time.  Cheerio.

That's your opinion, mine is that the nonsensically long film wastes people's time.


I suspect that Kaufman and Cowan are gatekeepers to contain the message of Lanka, and (for the time being) associate it with all sorts of misguided "truther" stuff and topics (like e.g. Peggy Hall). Unfortunately, Lanka himself has been promoting alternative ideas which I believe are ludicrous (Hamer's New Medicine). But he's the guy who originally came up with the story that "pathogenic viruses haven't been proven to exist" long ago, has done real work on it, won a court case showing that there's no scientific proof, and there would have been no reason for them to promote him.


That said, the best conference in English language about the no pathogenic virus topic that I have seen, is a recent one by Andrew Kaufman at the Corona Ausschuß (Corona Investigative Committee of Füllmich, Fischer, Wordarg & Co).

https://odysee.com/@DrAndrewKaufman:f/CoronaInvestigativeCommitteeHearsDrStefanLankaAndDrAndrewKaufman:b

Altogether the video is more than 90 minutes. I recommend to start at 1'30" and watch only Kaufman. There are two major portions where he speaks. If others talk, just wind forward until you see Kaufman again. Even ignore Lanka, his presentation is destroyed by technical problems. The leftist Committee wasn't amused, and their attempts to discredit their own guests are too boring. Then it's less than hour, IIRC like 45 minutes.