Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”  (Read 280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
« on: June 09, 2021, 07:25:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/cleveland-clinic-refutes-fauci-no-point-vaccinating-whove-CÖVÌD-19/

    Cleveland Clinic Refutes Fauci: No Point Vaccinating Those Who’ve Had CÖVÌD-19
    By Jim Hoft 

    Published June 8, 2021


    A new study by scientists at the Cleveland Clinic found that there was no point in vaccinating those who’ve had the COVDI019 already.

    This makes logical sense and is in line with what the public was always told about infectious disease.

    [size={defaultattr}]It was only when the megalomaniac Tony Fauci got involved with CÖVÌD-19 that healthy people were wearing masks, the entire economy was shut down, the death counts included people who died from the disease and with the disease, and those who had the disease were ordered to get the ναccιnє.[/size]
    [size={defaultattr}]
    This study brings a bit of sanity back into the American medical community.
    News-Medical.net reported:[/size]


    Quote
    Scientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of cσɾσnαvιɾυs disease 2019 CÖVÌD-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome cσɾσnαvιɾυs 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnєs should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server.

    In the United States, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two mRNA-based CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnєs developed by pfιzєr/BioNTech and mσdernα, which have shown high efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection and CÖVÌD-19 disease in clinical trials. However, the ability to ναccιnαte a large part of the global population is limited by ναccιnє supply.

    In order to ensure fair access to ναccιnєs throughout the world, the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnєs Global Access (COVAX) initiative was launched. In many countries, especially those with low socioeconomic status, there is a serious shortage of ναccιnєs. Thus, in order to get the maximum ναccιnє benefits, the most vulnerable population should be prioritized for the vaccination.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #1 on: June 09, 2021, 08:49:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is good news.  I'm pretty sure I got COVID (I do believe that it exists) and will go out and get the antibody tests.

    I was sick for about 3 weeks about 6 weeks ago, which is strange since that was after people started getting the vax, so perhaps it was due to vaccine shedders.

    1) had major body aches, like I got run over by a truck for 4 days
    2) then I was incredibly dizzy and had vertigo, even if I was laying down (for about 3 days)
    3) then I lost my sense of taste; not only that, but everything tasted vile and rotten, including water
    4) stomach and gastrointestinal issues for a day
    5) then felt lousy for another 10 days at the end until I felt better

    I'm hoping that I test positive for the antibodies and then I could use this Cleveland Clinic study to resist any attempts to force the vax on me.

    I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the most adverse reactions to the vax were from people who already had COVID.  Some predicted the harm done by the vax had the reverse concern, that the vaxed when later they get infected by COVID would have a massive immune overreaction, but what if the reverse is also true that if you've already had COVID and then get the vax, you could have a serious issue?


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #2 on: June 09, 2021, 09:03:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The meaning of CÖVÌD: Certification of ναccιnє Identification.  They want total control over the human individual and
    society.

    Most illness is the product of the mind.  If it was not for the constant braining washing and exaggerations and deliberate lies
    by the controlled mass media we would be a healthy people.

    Covid which is a annual flu has a 99.9% survival rate.

    Turn off the propaganda TV set. Their only job is to lie to you.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #3 on: June 09, 2021, 09:17:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I know that there was a phenomenon of people who used to have "chicken pox parties" where they deliberately tried to get their kids infected with chicken pox so they could be done with it and get the immunity.

    If this stands up -- and the Cleveland Clinic is a reputable authority here -- I could see the same thing going on with COVID, where people would deliberately try to get infected so they don't have to get the vax.

    If my employer tried to make me get the vax, then I could sue them, citing this study and also citing the fact that the vax has not been tested on the previously infected.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #4 on: June 09, 2021, 09:19:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The meaning of CÖVÌD: Certification of ναccιnє Identification.  They want total control over the human individual and
    society.

    Right, but this latest study from CC gives us another strategy to fight forced vaccination as a condition of employment.  They've been claiming that the natural immunity from COVID doesn't count, but this says the opposite.  And it's hard for courts to reject an authority like the Cleveland Clinic.

    Someone here at the Cleveland Clinic didn't "get the memo".


    Offline Romulus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 496
    • Reputation: +285/-53
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #5 on: June 09, 2021, 10:00:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I had COVID and I do believe it exists, I would say the worst part for me was loosing taste and smell for 2 weeks. All other effects really weren't that bad.

    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3849/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #6 on: June 09, 2021, 10:05:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I had CÖVÌD and I do believe it exists, I would say the worst part for me was loosing taste and smell for 2 weeks. All other effects really weren't that bad.
    How do you know you had covid? Did you let them stab one of those q-tips into your brain?
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.

    Offline Romulus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 496
    • Reputation: +285/-53
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #7 on: June 09, 2021, 10:11:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How do you know you had CÖVÌD? Did you let them stab one of those q-tips into your brain?
    Nah, I knew someone that had one jabbed in their brain. I was in contact with the person and we experienced the same symptoms.


    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6882
    • Reputation: +3849/-406
    • Gender: Male
    • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #8 on: June 09, 2021, 10:16:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Nah, I knew someone that had one jabbed in their brain. I was in contact with the person and we experienced the same symptoms.
    Good. I am afraid of the test. Maybe that is stupid. I don't know.
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31196
    • Reputation: +27113/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #9 on: June 09, 2021, 10:55:49 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Right, but this latest study from CC gives us another strategy to fight forced vaccination as a condition of employment.  They've been claiming that the natural immunity from CÖVÌD doesn't count, but this says the opposite.  And it's hard for courts to reject an authority like the Cleveland Clinic.

    Someone here at the Cleveland Clinic didn't "get the memo".


    The very idea that having a disease DOESN'T confer immunity or "real" immunity is ridiculous, and goes against all human experience.

    They're trying to redefine "herd immunity" and everything. Absolutely insane.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #10 on: June 09, 2021, 11:32:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is good news.  I'm pretty sure I got CÖVÌD (I do believe that it exists) and will go out and get the antibody tests.
    I wonder whether there is any danger of getting implanted when going to get the blood test?

    Or, if there are any downsides to having it on record that you were exposed to CÖVÌD by testing positive for antibodies?
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #11 on: June 09, 2021, 02:40:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This would be common sense for any other illness, but in the last year and a half they've been lying to try convince us our immune systems don't work and that vaccines are magical. Fact of that matter is, ALL a vaccine can even attempt to do is emulate a real infection. So the idea that a real infection wouldn't give you immunity in the same way is preposterous and absurd to anyone who did high school biology. Unless, of course, they ignore everything they know in order to blindly "trust the experts".

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4198
    • Reputation: +2439/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #12 on: June 09, 2021, 02:44:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The very idea that having a disease DOESN'T confer immunity or "real" immunity is ridiculous, and goes against all human experience.

    They're trying to redefine "herd immunity" and everything. Absolutely insane.


    That’s the whole point. They claim that people like us don’t believe in “science”, but they are the ones who ignore real science. Bruce Jenner is a woman, humans are the cause of globull warming, globull warming is real when the Earth is likely cooling, CÖVÌD is only transmitted in the air not on surfaces, masks protect against viruses, fluoride only helps strengthen teeth and doesn’t adversely affect other parts of the body when distributed in water systems, etc... :facepalm:
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Previously Infected = No Benefit from “Vax”
    « Reply #13 on: June 09, 2021, 02:45:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The very idea that having a disease DOESN'T confer immunity or "real" immunity is ridiculous, and goes against all human experience.

    They're trying to redefine "herd immunity" and everything. Absolutely insane.
    You'd have to wonder how any epidemic ever ended before the invention of vaccines, now that they're telling us only vaccines can cause herd immunity... somehow.