Because PRINCIPLES matter. As per many females, you only look at the person involve, whereas men look at the principles and the potential impact on society. We've had a couple of potential copycat crimes. Imagine if a precedent were set that this type of behavior was condoned, destroying a potential deterrent against it, since they could always use the "Clancy" defense. Nor does it suffice that Clancy herself is in a wheelchair. So what? Justice isn't SIMPLY about neutrlizing threats. There's such a thing as the society failing to values the lives of the murdered children by failing to demand justice, cheapening human life in principle. Dr. Alan Keyes delivered one of the most articulate explanations that I had ever heard about this. Women should be barred from serving on any juries except potentially as consultants, where the men could ask women some questions that might be appropriate for any given case at hand, although two of the three men showed themselves to have been turned into wimps.
Oh that makes sense.

Men deserve a jury of peers, but women don't.
Women ate too confusing too emotional, too weak. We need to keep them under lock and key. They have ruined society.
Or maybe men are just afraid of the connection women have to the spiritual?
That makes sense because society was perfect until women got more freedom.

Men have killed their family more often due to an upcoming divorce. Why aren't we including this in the conversation? The statistics say a man does this every 5 days.