Author Topic: Pfizer Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300% (Read 409 times)

SeanJohnson · « **on:** September 30, 2021, 08:18:30 AM »

‘If you get the Pfizer vax, you’re more likely to get COVID’ : Insider leaks FDA study

'So, when they weren’t injected, their infection rate was 1.3% and when they got injected, it was 4.34%. It went up by over 300%,’ Pfizer ex-employee Karen Kingston stated. ‘They had less infection when they had no protection. So, that’s a problem.’

Varitage.com

Patrick Delaney
Comments
7
Thu Sep 30, 2021 - 6:29 am EDT
(LifeSiteNews) — A former Pfizer employee, now turned whistleblower, has provided docuмentation indicating the pharmaceutical giant—whose gene-based COVID-19 vaccine has now been reportedlyinjected almost 225 million times into the arms of Americans—knows these shots cause recipients to become more susceptible to contracting COVID-19.
On Saturday Karen Kingston, the former Pfizer employee, a pharmaceutical marketing expert and biotech analyst, appeared beside medical freedom rights attorney Thomas Renz in a public meeting. The Ohio-based lawyer has been involved in several major cases brought against federal agencies relating to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights over the last 19 months.

After introducing Kingston, Renz presented the docuмents she had provided. (See from 17.40 in video.)

Of note is a “Briefing Docuмent” used in a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee meeting on September 17, 2021. Titled “Application for licensure of a booster dose for COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA),” it includes a report on a study conducted by Pfizer testing the longevity of immunity provided by their product over time.
Involving over 36K participants, the main study revealed that the group injected with the regimen earlier were more likely to be infected with the virus than those injected later, indicating a possible “waning of immunity” for the shots. The group injected earlier had a 7% chance of infection in the time period, and those injected later, only a 5.16% rate, equating to the former group having a 36% greater chance of infection than the latter.
In addition, since both groups were measured for the same time period, the latter involving a significant placebo period prior to injection (5.1 months on average), the placebo group was unusually untouched. As Kingston stated in a telephone interview with LifeSiteNews, “There should have been more people infected in the placebo group because they were going on longer without any protection.” She suggested this would therefore seem to indicate that those injected have an even higher chance of being infected with COVID-19 than the 36% difference indicated by this portion of the study.
Extending this conclusion a step further, the docuмent reports, “An additional analysis appears to indicate that incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2.”
In other words, Kingston said, “if you have two doses of Pfizer, your rate for getting infected increases over time.”
Leading to a discovery the biotech analyst called “super alarming,” the report looked exclusively at the placebo group, comparing their rate of infection in the first four months, when they had no protection, to the four months following their injections with the Pfizer product.
During that initial placebo period, the docuмent reports that the infection rate of this group was “12.6 cases per 1,000 person-years,” which equates to a 1.3% infection rate. Following their injections, there were “43.4 cases per 1,000 person- years” or a 4.34% infection rate.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES

US Canada Catholic

“So, when they weren’t injected, their infection rate was 1.3%, and when they got injected, it was 4.34%. It went up by over 300%,” Kingston stated.
“They had less infection when they had no protection. So, that’s a problem.”
Renz summarized this study’s findings to his large live and streamed audience, stating, “It says if you get the Pfizer vax, you’re more likely to get COVID. More likely! It says it right there.”
“Seriously? Seriously? It’s unbelievable,” he said.

— Article continues below Petition —

BOYCOTT United over religious and medical COVID vaccine exemptions
Show Petition Text

16358 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 17500!

Add your signature:

Country...USACanadaAaland IslandsAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D'IvoireCroatiaCubaCuracaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinePanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRepublic of KosovoReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthelemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint MartinSaint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint MaartenSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan Mayen IslandsSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVatican CityVenezuelaVietnamVirgin Islands (British)Virgin Islands (U.S.)Wallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe State...AlabamaAlaskaAmerican SamoaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFederated States Of MicronesiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarshall IslandsMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPalauPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashingtonWashington D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces Pacific
Sign this Petition

Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Renz then raised questions about whether any Pfizer and FDA docuмents indicate the pharmaceutical company’s gene-based COVID vaccine causes a type of shedding which could produce sickness in the unvaccinated who spend sufficient time in proximity to the people who have received these injections.
He provided an excerpt from a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine study docuмent which required reporting to their Safety department should a female be “found to be pregnant while being exposed” to the study intervention, even if this is only “by inhalation or skin contact.”

Extending this caution one contact further, the docuмent stipulates that should a “male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact” then “expose his female partner prior to or around the time of conception,” this too needs to be reported.
“Why is that a reportable safety event?” asked Renz. “It doesn’t make any sense. Well, it makes total sense if [shedding] is happening.”
In an August 26 article Dr. Peter McCullough reported on a preprint study which “found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.”
“While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders,” wrote McCullough, the editor of two major medical journals.
He indicated this may be the reason so many places are experiencing such a “prominent outbreak,” even with a very high level of herd immunity and vaccinated individuals.
In addition to the resulting efficacy rate for the Pfizer vaccine now being measured as anywhere from 17% to 42%, “far below the 50% regulatory standard to even have a vaccine on the market,” the possibility of the vaccinated becoming superspreaders should not be a surprise.
A 2003 paper analyzing the use of coronavirus vaccines in chickens, and proposing them for combatting SARS in in the human population, states:
Application of a SARS vaccine is perhaps best limited to a minimal number of targeted individuals who can be monitored, as some vaccinated persons might, if infected by SARS coronavirus, become asymptomatic excretors of virus, thereby posing a risk to non-vaccinated people.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
RELATED

DigitalLogos · « **Reply #1 on:** September 30, 2021, 08:22:09 AM »

So pretty much what the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying for about a year now?
This is going to be a brutal flu season

Ladislaus · « **Reply #2 on:** September 30, 2021, 08:23:38 AM »

Sure, this is due to the ADE that Robert Malone and many top virologists have been predicting.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #3 on:** September 30, 2021, 08:24:21 AM »

Quote from: DigitalLogos on September 30, 2021, 08:22:09 AM

So pretty much what the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying for about a year now?
This is going to be a brutal flu season

The ~~predicted~~ planned “dark winter.”

Ladislaus · « **Reply #4 on:** September 30, 2021, 08:25:31 AM »

Quote from: DigitalLogos on September 30, 2021, 08:22:09 AM

So pretty much what the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying for about a year now?
This is going to be a brutal flu season

Agreed. People are going to start dropping like flies from either the flu or COVID or something because the jab has destroyed their immune system. No doubt they'll invent Variant X to blame for it all, and therefore blame the unjabbed for it.

I think that's the intent. If people do start dropping and they blame a variant caused by the unjabbed, there will be a public outcry for forced jabbing.

These guys designed the program brilliantly ... which is to be expected when taking marching orders from Satan.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #5 on:** September 30, 2021, 08:27:20 AM »

Quote from: SeanJohnson on September 30, 2021, 08:24:21 AM

The ~~predicted~~ planned “dark winter.”

That and they're deliberately destroying the food supply and the wider supply chain. So there will come a time when we can't get food except at government distribution centers, with "Unjabbed Need Not Apply" on the door.

I think that they're going to try starving the unjabbed into submission. We may be headed for another Holodomor, but worldwide.

Matthew · « **Reply #6 on:** September 30, 2021, 08:36:36 AM »

My understanding is that the whole strategy of the jab -- creating specific antibodies WHICH TAKE THE PLACE OF THE GENERAL ONES NATURALLY IN YOUR BODY against a variant which is probably GONE at this point -- is going to cause a lot more people to get sick.

Creating antibodies is a ZERO SUM GAME. You can't jam your bloodstream with 10X or 20X the normal number of antibodies, until your blood becomes a gel or a paste from all the antibodies and white blood cells. It doesn't work that way. The specific "trained" antibodies generated by a vaccine HAVE TO TAKE THE PLACE of the general, generic antibodies that can attack any foreign body (bacteria, virus, whatever). This is particularly true about these new MRNA type vaccines.

But even with classic, old-school vaccines there is a limit to effectiveness. You can't just take 50 or 100 shots and become impervious to disease, like some kind of superman. If only!

Author Topic: Pfizer Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300% (Read 409 times)

SeanJohnson

Pfizer Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%

DigitalLogos

Re: pfιzєr Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%

Ladislaus

Re: pfιzєr Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%

SeanJohnson

Re: pfιzєr Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%

Ladislaus

Re: pfιzєr Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%

Ladislaus

Re: pfιzєr Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%

Matthew

Re: pfιzєr Jab INCREASES Chance of Infection 300%