mRNA in the Meat? Molnupiravir in the Water? Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines?
Mad scientists won't stop until they've completely destroyed the natural order.
So I get this text from a friend yesterday:
Quote About covid jabs, it seems they are now using them on farmed animals in Australia, to replace currently used jabs probably all over the world. I haven't verified the news but seems plausible. This means meat might become more toxic.
And then I see the following this morning:
Space Pirate (Swashbuckling) @SpacePirate144
mRNA Meat Is On The Way! 🥩💩
Is it PANIC TIME??!! Let’s explore.
First, zoo animals have been vaccinated for covid for a while now,
which I covered in May. However, the covid vaccines used in zoos were apparently not mRNA vaccines.
Thus, as far as I know, mRNA vaccine technology has not been used in animals, except in clinical trials, until now.
So here’s the big question: Could an mRNA vaccine injected in animals transfer to humans who eat the meat?
Well, we can presume that the same mRNA vaccine can affect both humans and animals, since mice and other animals have been used to test mRNA technologies designed for humans. From an
opinion piece in the Boston Herald (emphasis mine):
Quote BioNTech is using mRNA to combat a form of multiple sclerosis in mice. The experimental treatment stopped muscle deterioration and restored some lost motor functions without impairing the entire immune system. Future research with nonhuman primates could lead to a vaccine against this debilitating disease for use in humans.
Another promising application of mRNA technology is in prenatal gene repair. Researchers at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania injected mouse fetuses with RNA that instructed the cells to produce certain proteins necessary for health after birth. This experiment could be among the first steps toward developing preventative treatments for genetic diseases.
Let me just state for the record that I’m far less critical of the potential application of mRNA in genetic or degenerative diseases. But to me, there is a huge difference between mRNA being used to produce “proteins necessary for health” vs. producing a toxic spike protein. (Why do I need to write this? It’s for the stupid “fact checkers” and whatnot who might try to claim that people like me are just reactionary Luddite types. Far from it.)
At any rate, given this research, we can assume that mRNA given to animals could potentially also work in humans. From the same Boston Herald article:
Quote Animals are the closest living systems for predicting how a potential therapy — mRNA or otherwise — might perform in a human. And they are closer than many realize. Rhesus macaques share about 93% of their DNA with humans.
So what are they planning to do with animals and mRNA vaccines? It’s starting in Australia…
NSW fast tracks mRNA FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease vaccines:
Quote The NSW Government has taken another step towards fast tracking the world first mRNA vaccines for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Lumpy Skin Disease, inking a deal with US biotechnology company Tiba Biotech.
…
Meat and Livestock Australia managing director Jason Strong said mRNA vaccines had additional benefits for the livestock sector.
“This type of vaccine technology may not require the longer testing and approval processes required for conventional vaccine development and importation as it does not use animal products,” Mr Strong said.
“That means we can use it to provide faster responses to outbreaks, enable eradication and return to freedom status – and market access – sooner.”
In other words, there’s an mRNA gold rush going on. Drug producers see an opportunity - governments have gotten extremely lax with their oversight - and so mRNA vaccines can be produced quickly and cheaply.
The term McVaccine is quite correct!
Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines
Wait, it gets better! Researchers are now working on self-amplifying mRNA vaccines for animals (and humans). If you see “saRNA,” it means self-amplifying mRNA. From
Genvax Technologies Secures $6.5 Million to Advance Novel Vaccine Platform:
Quote The company's proprietary saRNA platform allows for rapid development of herd-specific vaccines matched 100% to the variant strain circulating in an animal-production operation. By inserting a specific transgene or “gene of interest” (GOI) matched to the variant strain into the platform, the saRNA can generate an antibody response without requiring the whole pathogen, Genvax explained.
What in God’s green earth is a “self-amplifying mRNA vaccine”? From
The Conversation:
Quote Self-amplifying mRNA is another approach to reduce vaccine doses. Self-amplifying mRNA is engineered to make more copies of itself once delivered into cells. This means only a small initial dose is needed.
Quote Researchers at Imperial College London and Arcturus are using this method to develop COVID-19 vaccines, although trials have only recently completed phase I stage.
While more research will be needed to understand self-amplifying mRNA vaccines, this could reduce costs, as less material is needed.
So…you mean…the vaccine will self-amplify…meaning self-replicate…like a virus?
1And…the reason behind doing this is to “reduce costs.” Lovely.
OK. So we have mRNA animal vaccines. Check. The next step is self-replicating mRNA animal vaccines. Check.
Could these mRNA technologies possibly impact the food supply?!
“Impossible!” the mainstream media will say!
Let the gaslighting begin!
The reality is somewhere in the middle between “mRNA animals vaccines will kill everyone who eats meat” and “mRNA vaccination of livestock is totally harmless to humans.”
I suppose once something dies, active mRNA cellular metabolism would cease. So that’s not the main concern here. But would mRNA encased in lipid nanoparticles survive death?
Well, in the least, most likely, any mRNA lipid nanoparticles in the animals would not survive the cooking process. Let’s hope.
I’m not totally reassured by this theory, but that would be my guess as the most likely outcome.
I’m frankly far more concerned about the impact of these vaccine technologies on the animals themselves…and their long-term health and reproductive potential.
As Igor Chudov has been reporting, babies have been negatively impacted by the vaccine mRNA in their mothers…including mother’s milk.
Never mind that mad scientists have been trying to put vaccines into our food supply for decades, from a 1996 article,
Yes, we have vaccinating bananas:
Quote Biotechnologists at the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, an
independent research centre at Cornell University in New York State, are
genetically engineering a banana to produce an antigen found in the outer coat
of the hepatitis B virus. Banana vaccines would be ideal for developing
countries because they would cost just a few cents per dose, compared to the
$100 to $200 per dose for traditional vaccines, says Charles
Arntzen, president of the institute.
It’s always about the “cost savings” isn’t it?
Molnupiravir vs. mRNA...Which is Worse?
While we’re busy looking at genetic vaccines, let’s not forget about the danger that pharmaceutical drugs can also pose to the ecosystem.
Molnupiravir is a nucleoside analog anti-covid drug that was EUA-approved by the FDA in December 2021. The potential of this drug to damage animals in the wild, across the entire food chain, is epic. Why? Because as I wrote in December 2021:
Quote Molnupiravir, which we’ll call “M” for short in terms of its chemical action, could vie with natural cellular processes, and accidentally be replicated into DNA during DNA repair.
Wholistic
Covid Drug Molnupiravir: Toxic Chemotherapy for the Genome?
There’s a classic Alex Jones rant about chemicals in the water turning “the friggin’ frogs gαy” that has been memed to death and even turned into a remix with 16 million YouTube views and counting. It’s easy to laugh at Jones, but some of his predictions seem to come true, spawning the saying …
“M” could potentially be excreted into the environment, i.e., pooped out into water supplies, where it could be picked up by other living creatures and infect them as well.
Brian Mowrey writes (emphasis mine):
Quote Nucleoside analogs, as I argued in “Doppelgänger,” are not “antivirals.” The mechanism of “viral replication” which they seek to sabotage is intrinsic to cellular metabolism, DNA repair, gene expression, cellular division, and sperm cell longevity. Ribavirin, Molnupiravir, and all other analogs in development, essentially seek to cut off the face to spite the nose. It cannot be done without short and long term harms, and profound risks to fertility. This is not a “therapeutic” platform - it is chemotherapy for the genome. It is an appropriate accident at best, that this particular drug was developed with funding from the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency (Ridgeback and Merck only took over after six years of DTRA-funded research24).
Is this another “baseless claim” or conspiracy theory, as
the ignorant “fact-checkers” at the AP would say? Nope. The NIH actually knows this is a risk! Here’s what they say on their own website (emphasis mine):
Quote As a mutagenic ribonucleoside antiviral agent, there is a theoretical risk that molnupiravir will be metabolized by the human host cell and incorporated into the host DNA, leading to mutations. Molnupiravir has been evaluated in 2 in vivo rodent mutagenicity assays. One study produced equivocal results. In the other study, there was no evidence for mutagenicity.6 The FDA concluded that, based on the available genotoxicity data and the 5-day duration of treatment, molnupiravir has a low risk for genotoxicity.6 In addition, there have been concerns about the potential effects of molnupiravir on SARS-CoV-2 mutation rates; the FDA has required that the manufacturer monitor genomic databases for the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Mutagenic = causing mutations.
So wait…they know that molnupiravir can potentially cause genetic mutations, and they have decided that merely two rodent studies prove that this isn’t a concern? Excuse me, mice aren’t people.
Second, they also know that molnupiravir can potentially cause SARS-CoV-2 variants!! And their response to this? Let’s have the fox guard the henhouse and “monitor genomic databases” to see if any new variants arise.
What. The. Bleep.
WAIT. THERE’S MORE!
Quote
- The Panel recommends against the use of molnupiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 in pregnant patients unless there are no other options and therapy is clearly indicated (AIII).
- People who engage in sɛҳuąƖ activity that may result in conception should use effective contraception during and following treatment with molnupiravir. For more details, see Considerations in sɛҳuąƖly Active Individuals below.
Whoaaaa…
Well, for once they advise against pregnant women using this experimental drug...well, mostly. These idiots say “use molnupiravir if nothing else is feasible during pregnancy,” and at the same time, would discount the use of ivermectin. Madness!
And they are now basically admitting that molnupiravir can be transmitted to another person via sɛҳuąƖ fluids. More from the NIH:
Quote Patients of childbearing potential should be counseled about abstaining from sex or using reliable contraception for the duration of therapy and for up to 4 days after taking molnupiravir. Reproductive toxicity has been reported in animal studies of molnupiravir, and molnupiravir may be mutagenic during pregnancy.
The FDA EUA states that men of reproductive potential who are sɛҳuąƖly active with individuals of childbearing potential should be counseled to abstain from sex or use a reliable method of contraception for the duration of treatment and for at least 3 months after the last dose of molnupiravir.
Seriously, how many guys are going to want to put a glove on it for 3 months after their last dose of molnupiravir? How many would even understand what the real risk is here? Because it sounds crazy even to me.
In short, we’re now putting mutagenic, potentially self-replicating drugs and soon-to-be self-amplifying vaccines into people and animals, with not one ounce of concern over the long-term implications on our ecosystem and the long-term health of various species.
How can you protect yourself and your family from this? Ultimately, you won’t be able to get away from it. None of us will.
This, along with the nuclear bombs that might be dropped soon, may be our downfall. Sorry for the big black pill today, but it is what it is.
Follow me on GETTR
@stephaniebrailTo clarify, based on a comment below…the current mRNA vaccines are not designed to self-amplify. The idea behind self-amplifying vaccine technology is that you inject a small amount of vaccine with mRNA, and then once it is in the system, the vaccine ingredients cause the injected mRNA to self-replicate and create more mRNA.
The current mRNA vaccines are not self-amplifying by design. The current mRNA vaccines insert a set amount of mRNA into your system, but once that mRNA gets in, it then replicates spike protein, but not more mRNA. I hope that makes more sense.
Topic: mRNA Vax in Your Food (Read 466 times)