Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13

Author Topic: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?  (Read 11889 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
« on: May 22, 2022, 01:54:09 PM »
So, I hadn't necessarily believed that the jab is the Mark of the Beast, but then I ran across this.  Revelation 16:2:

Quote
And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth, and there fell a sore and grievous wound upon men, who had the character of the beast; and upon them that adored the image thereof.

"sore and grievious wound" is rendered by a lot of the newer translations as

* "festering sores"
* "foul and loathesome sore"
* "ugly and painful sores"

https://biblia.com/bible/esv/revelation/16/2

I'm going to try to find the Greek here in a minute, but it says that only those who had received the "character" (aka "mark") of the beast would be afflicted with the sores. 

There are theories out there that the whole monkeypox thing is just cover for the effect of the jab.  That would seem to suggest that the jab might in fact be the Mark of the Beast.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2022, 02:04:00 PM »
So the Greek for wound is [h]elkos, and the lexicon says it's typically used of a wound that exudes puss.  I don't have one of the larger Greek Lexica anymore in which I could confirm that.

sore and grevious
kakon + poneron

Literally just means bad and onerous, but it could refer to loathesome, disgusting, troublesome, etc. when combined with wound.  I'd need the much larger Lexicon to be sure.

But I think that festering sores might not be too far off.

Why does it afflict just those who received the mark?  Was it supernaturally directed or somehow a natural consequence of the "Mark"?
Logged

Offline Miseremini

Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2022, 02:21:08 PM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on May 22, 2022, 01:54:09 PM
So, I hadn't necessarily believed that the jab is the Mark of the Beast, but then I ran across this.  Revelation 16:2:

"sore and grievious wound" is rendered by a lot of the newer translations as

* "festering sores"
* "foul and loathesome sore"
* "ugly and painful sores"

https://biblia.com/bible/esv/revelation/16/2

I'm going to try to find the Greek here in a minute, but it says that only those who had received the "character" (aka "mark") of the beast would be afflicted with the sores. 

There are theories out there that the whole monkeypox thing is just cover for the effect of the jab.  That would seem to suggest that the jab might in fact be the Mark of the Beast.

I'd be more interested in what is stated in the Apocalypse of a Catholic bible.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2022, 02:43:44 PM »
Quote from: Miseremini on May 22, 2022, 02:21:08 PM
I'd be more interested in what is stated in the Apocalypse of a Catholic bible.

What are you talking about?  I started with the citatioin from D-R.
Logged

Offline Drolo

Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2022, 02:49:10 PM »
So... Who are the two witnesses? When they were killed and people celebrated it? Who is the Antichrist?

It could be if it affects all the vaxed and exclusively them. I guess we'll know soon.



Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
« previous next »