Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?  (Read 9612 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DigitalLogos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8304
  • Reputation: +4718/-754
  • Gender: Male
  • Slave to the Sacred Heart
    • Twitter
Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
« Reply #45 on: May 23, 2022, 10:05:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sure, St Augustine wouldnt know the historical nature of the Church, as we do.  We have 1,900 years of history to look back on.

    But when speaking of FUTURE events, from a spiritual and temporal view, I’d trust the Church Fathers (who learned from the Apostles) and the Middle Age saints way more than Kramer. 

    Who knows the Apocalyose better than St John?  What Church Fathers were disciples of St John?  St Ignatius of Antioch and Polycarp.  There’s no way these holy men didn’t know as much about future events as anyone in history.  St John would’ve told them everything that God would allow. 

    As a whole, the Church Fathers wrote volumes and volumes on the Apocalypse alone.  They discussed the spiritual aspects but also political events.
    Trusting in the knowledge of Frs. Kramer or Berry, who studied the Apocalypse, collectively, for 60 years, is not without prudence. You act as though they were just pulling this stuff out of their rear-ends.

    I could be trying to interpret things myself here, but I'm not. I'm basing it on two theologians who are far more knowledgeable about Apocalyptic literature than either of us. And yet, what I'm getting from you is, that because I'm not trying to piece together what the Fathers and Doctors said myself, and not relying upon the myriad of private prophecies, what I've said is of no real value as to whether Lad is onto something about Apoc. 16:2 or the advent of the Antichrist.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12178
    • Reputation: +7688/-2346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #46 on: May 24, 2022, 09:00:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    You act as though they were just pulling this stuff out of their rear-ends.
    Kramer isn't inventing stuff but he is ignoring/editing 1,000 years of saints/thelogians/Doctors of the Church/etc.  This is absolutely crazy.  Talk about protestant/revolutionary.  Berry (1920s?) is much earlier than Kramer (1956), so i'd trust Berry more.

    My point is, Kramer's 1950s book reason for ignoring 1,000 years of Church History (400s - 1400s) is nuts.  He sounds like a Modernist.  He wants to give an "ancient understanding" of the Apocalypse.

    Only modern scholars and theologians and scripturists have searched more deeply into the writings of ancient Fathers and into the prophetical books and fragments of prophecies of the Old Testament. They have come nearer to the true meaning of the prophetical visions and words of the Apocalypse than the doctors and theologians of the Middle Ages.

    Let's remember what Paul VI said when he created the new mass:

    One ought not to think, however, that this revision of the Roman Missal has been improvident. The progress that the liturgical sciences has accomplished in the last four centuries has, without a doubt, prepared the way. After the Council of Trent, the study "of ancient manuscripts of the Vatican library and of others gathered elsewhere," as Our predecessor, St. Pius V, indicates in the Apostolic Constitution Quo primum, has greatly helped for the revision of the Roman Missal. Since then, however, more ancient liturgical sources have been discovered and published and at the same time liturgical formulas of the Oriental Church have become better known. Many wish that the riches, both doctrinal and spiritual, might not be hidden in the darkness of the libraries, but on the contrary might be brought into the light to illumine and nourish the spirits and souls of Christians.

    The modernists were alive and well in the 50s and were paving the way for V2.  People like Kramer who want to go "back to ancient times" are wrong, plain and simple.

    Berry might be ok.


    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #47 on: May 24, 2022, 09:24:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Lord have mercy, I'm so tired of this trad pontificating about every little iota.

    Now Fr. Kramer is suspect for Modernism too? Give me a break. :facepalm:
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12178
    • Reputation: +7688/-2346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #48 on: May 24, 2022, 09:52:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ignoring 1,000+ years of Church history is not a small iota.

    Offline EWPJ

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 558
    • Reputation: +367/-52
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #49 on: May 24, 2022, 10:14:14 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pax Vobis has pretty much already laid everything out that I was going to say and understands what The Church has taught on these matters.  Thanks Pax. 

    To add though, we have to understand that there can be TYPES of certain things throughout history and there has been.  I believe V2 was a TYPE of The Great Apostasy but NOT The Great Apostasy (this will come after Antichrist comes into power and almost the whole world is Catholic), just like I think Convid Crackcines are a TYPE of the Mark of the Beast but not THE Mark of the Beast (which will come after Antichrist conquers most of the world or at around the same time.)

    As Pax laid out this is the most consistent with Church Fathers and Church Teaching and there have been a lot of heretics (prots) and modernists throughout history who have tried to alter this to fit their interpretations.  


    Offline Miser Peccator

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4351
    • Reputation: +2037/-458
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #50 on: May 24, 2022, 02:56:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • David Spangler:  Director of Planetary Initiative United Nations

    I exposed AB Vigano's public meetings with Crowleyan Satanist Dugin so I ask protection on myself family friends priest, under the Blood of Jesus Christ and mantle of the Blessed Virgin Mary! If harm comes to any of us may that embolden the faithful to speak out all the more so Catholics are not deceived.



    [fon

    Offline Miser Peccator

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4351
    • Reputation: +2037/-458
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #51 on: May 24, 2022, 03:09:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • (graphene and hydrogel)


    Quantum-dot tattoos hold vaccination record

    Rice bioengineer reveals dissolving microneedles that also embed fluorescent medical info
    Keeping track of a child’s shots could be so much easier with technology invented by a new Rice University professor and his colleagues.
    Kevin McHugh, an assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice since this summer, and a team at his previous institution, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, report in a cover story in Science Translational Medicine on their development of quantum-dot tags that fluoresce with information after they’re injected as part of a vaccination.

    A pattern of 1.5-millimeter microneedles that contain vaccine and fluorescent quantum dots are applied as a patch.
    A pattern of 1.5-millimeter microneedles that contain vaccine and fluorescent quantum dots are applied as a patch. The needles dissolve under the skin, leaving the encapsulated quantum dots. Their pattern can be read to identify the vaccine that was administered. The project was co-led by Rice University bioengineer Kevin McHugh during his time at MIT. (Credit: Second Bay Studios)
    The tags are incorporated in only some of the array of sugar-based microneedles on a patch. When the needles dissolve in about two minutes, they deliver the vaccine and leave the pattern of tags just under the skin, where they become something like a bar-code tattoo.
    Instead of ink, this highly specific medical record consists of copper-based quantum dots embedded in biocompatible, micron-scale capsules. Their near-infrared dye is invisible, but the pattern they set can be read and interpreted by a customized smartphone.
    The two-year project is aimed at the 1.5 million preventable deaths that result from a lack of vaccinations, primarily in developing nations.
    “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation came to us and said, ‘Hey, we have a real problem — knowing who’s vaccinated,’” said McHugh, who was recruited to join Rice with funding from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. “They said, ‘We go on vaccination campaigns where people get into Hummers, drive to a rural village, set up a tent and start immunizing people, but they don’t always know who’s been immunized before and what vaccines are still needed.”

    Kevin McHugh
    Kevin McHugh
    Parents often don’t know their children’s vaccination histories, McHugh said. “So our idea was to put the record on the person,” he said. “This way, later on, people can scan over the area to see what vaccines have been administered and give only the ones still needed.
    “There are two sides to this,” he said. “First, is that you don’t administer unnecessary vaccines, which has a cost. But even bigger, you don’t leave people underimmunized and at risk of getting an infectious disease.”
    McHugh said the team worked with a bioethicist to be sure the patients’ data remains protected. “She said we’re on solid ethical ground as long as people can opt out, like getting the patch with only the vaccine. Also, the patch with quantum dots only contains information about the vaccine received. It doesn’t tell you anything else about the person.”
    The square-centimeter patches hold up to 16 tiny needles. “They don’t go very deep, which makes them theoretically painless and a lot easier for kids,” McHugh said. “They’re like putting on a bandage.”
    Because the 1.5-millimeter needles disintegrate in the skin, no biohazardous sharps remain for disposal, he said. Testing in model skin in strong light showed the 4-nanometer dots should be readable for at least five years.
    McHugh plans to continue his work on the technology at Rice. “There are so many aspects to this particular project that we need nanotechnologists, bacteriologists, chemists and computer scientists,” he said. “So this is certainly something I’m thinking about for my lab here.”




    Mike Williams

    ABOUT MIKE WILLIAMS


    Mike Williams is a senior media relations specialist in Rice University's Office of Public Affairs.

    I exposed AB Vigano's public meetings with Crowleyan Satanist Dugin so I ask protection on myself family friends priest, under the Blood of Jesus Christ and mantle of the Blessed Virgin Mary! If harm comes to any of us may that embolden the faithful to speak out all the more so Catholics are not deceived.



    [fon

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12178
    • Reputation: +7688/-2346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #52 on: May 24, 2022, 03:29:57 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • MiserP, you've posted this stuff before.  Has nothing to do with the discussion.


    Offline Miser Peccator

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4351
    • Reputation: +2037/-458
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #53 on: May 24, 2022, 03:36:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • MiserP, you've posted this stuff before.  Has nothing to do with the discussion.

    The thread is about what might be the mark--the current shot or one to come.

    I don't know what it is, but quantom dot is another possibility.

    Plus you pointed out that it won't be accidental and the 

    UN guy says there will be an initiation.
    I exposed AB Vigano's public meetings with Crowleyan Satanist Dugin so I ask protection on myself family friends priest, under the Blood of Jesus Christ and mantle of the Blessed Virgin Mary! If harm comes to any of us may that embolden the faithful to speak out all the more so Catholics are not deceived.



    [fon

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #54 on: May 24, 2022, 03:47:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ignoring 1,000+ years of Church history is not a small iota.
    Have you read his, or Fr. Berry's, books? I am genuinely curious since you wouldn't even entertain MHFM's speculation surrounding JPII in the other thread (to clarify, I am not saying I believe what they say about him).

    "Ignoring" is not the proper word. He chose not to go with the purely spiritual interpretation that is most prevalent during that period. He still uses the Fathers. But, I don't need to justify it, as it's already been given imprimatur and nihil obstat prior to V2. And we can split hairs about the individual orthodoxy of Fr. Kramer, Bp. Mueller, or Fr. Considine; but its still the approval of the Church versus whatever you've personally stitched together from the Fathers and Doctors of the Church.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46755
    • Reputation: +27637/-5127
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #55 on: May 24, 2022, 04:04:39 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think there's always been a bit more latitude given by the Church with regard to interpreting Revelation, since it could and likely does have multiple meanings, and we're dealing with application of prophecy to specific events and persons rather than matters that are inherently doctrinal.  It's a bit different than other Patristic Tradition in that it's possible that even St. John didn't understand EXACTLY how it would play out, as he was merely recounting what he saw in his visions.


    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #56 on: May 24, 2022, 04:21:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's a bit different than other Patristic Tradition in that it's possible that even St. John didn't understand EXACTLY how it would play out, as he was merely recounting what he saw in his visions.
    Kind of similar to the vision of Ezechiel 1, knowing that angels do not have physical forms, so he just recounted what he saw in material and symbolic terms. I don't doubt that the substance of the revelation was lost on St. John at all, but it's likely that the comprehension of just what he saw was limited by his human understanding; again, just like Ezechiel.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12178
    • Reputation: +7688/-2346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #57 on: May 24, 2022, 04:36:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Quote
    "Ignoring" is not the proper word.
    :facepalm:  He used the word "skipped" which means intentional ignoring.




    Quote
    He chose not to go with the purely spiritual interpretation that is most prevalent during that period.
    Ok, then don't act like his book is some kind of gospel, especially when a) the saints/doctors who he "skipped" (including St Augustine) wrote 100x more than he did on the subject (i.e. 1 book).  And don't act like just because it's pre-V2 that it's some kind of eureka moment to understanding the last days.


    It sounds to me like he wanted to cater to protestants, because he ignores the 1,000 years when the world is most catholic and also admits he wants a "less spiritual" answer.  Sounds just like a V2 mindset.

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #58 on: May 24, 2022, 04:42:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ok, then don't act like his book is some kind of gospel, especially when a) the saints/doctors who he "skipped" (including St Augustine) wrote 100x more than he did on the subject (i.e. 1 book).  And don't act like just because it's pre-V2 that it's some kind of eureka moment to understanding the last days.
    I'm not. I was up-front about my basing what I know of Apocalyptic commentaries on him and Fr. Berry, with some of Dupont, and others. You are the one vehemently dismissing it because it doesn't fit your own interpretation.


    Quote
    It sounds to me like he wanted to cater to protestants, because he ignores the 1,000 years when the world is most catholic and also admits he wants a "less spiritual" answer.  Sounds just like a V2 mindset.
    "Sounds like" = "I have not read the book"
    Just like you dismissing the exegesis of MHFM without viewing their arguments. I'm sorry, but that's just intellectually dishonest.

    As for "less spiritual", him following the logic of Pope Leo XIII's Providentissimus Deus and taking the literal interpretation (a la St. Augustine) before moving to the "spiritual", i.e. allegorical, moral or anagogical senses:
    Quote
    15. But he must not on that account consider that it is forbidden, when just cause exists, to push inquiry and exposition beyond what the Fathers have done; provided he carefully observes the rule so wisely laid down by St. Augustine-not to depart from the literal and obvious sense, except only where reason makes it untenable or necessity requires;
    And further, the same section of Pope Leo XIII's epistle supports the decision of Fr. Kramer to avoid relying too much on the Fathers because they emphasized a more "spiritual" (i.e. allegorical or moral) sense over the literal:
    Quote
    although it is true that the holy Fathers did not thereby pretend directly to demonstrate dogmas of faith, but used it as a means of promoting virtue and piety, such as, by their own experience, they knew to be most valuable.
    For Fr. Kramer to provide an exegesis on the letter of the Apocalypse for the purpose of drawing out what can be applied to history, rather than the moral or allegorical sense like the Fathers, and then claim that he's attempting to "cater to protestants" shows that you don't know what you're talking about because, again, you haven't done the reading.

    From the note following the Bibliography:
    Quote
    Many other modem commentaries, Catholic and Protestant, have been read and analysed carefully, and in all of them many parts have been found that agree exactly with the interpretation presented here. But many swerve off from the logical sequence in too many places to make a clear picture and narrative possible. Through many of them our interpretation might be said to run like a red line. How near it is to the truth, the advent of future facts of history must reveal.
    Note: he is trying to make a clear picture of the Apocalypse for Catholic readers, therefore justifying why he decides to stray from the moral/allegorical ("Spiritual") sense emphasized by so many Fathers. That isn't modernism.


    Quote
    Sounds just like a V2 mindset.
    Right. So, that's exactly why I came across his book through sedevacantist traditionalists, because of his V2 mindset. Get back to me when you want to be objective and actually take the time to do the reading.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12178
    • Reputation: +7688/-2346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Monkey Pox and Revelation 16:2?
    « Reply #59 on: May 24, 2022, 04:50:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    I'm not. I was up-front about my basing what I know of Apocalyptic commentaries on him and Fr. Berry, with some of Dupont, and others. You are the one vehemently dismissing it because it doesn't fit your own interpretation.
    Let's try this one more time.  I've read books which summarize what the Church Fathers say.  They considered ALL aspects of the Apocalypse (spiritual, political, church, allegory, literal, etc).  I've also read Dupont many, many times but he mainly deals with prophecy, not the Church Fathers.  But, in my opinion, most of these prophecies line up with the "consensus" of the Church Fathers.  So I see a general timeline/story of the End Times, using these 2 sources.


    (I'm not sure of Fr Berry), but Fr Kramer says that he's only looking at a PART of the Church's view on the Apocalypse (skipping the spiritual part and also 1,000 years of additional commentary of saints on the Church Fathers (i.e. St Augustine/St Thomas).

    So i've read the FULL story of 2,000 years of history; Fr Kramer looks at PART of history.  Who's interpretation is more complete?  Obviously, not Fr Kramer.