This is why I'm skeptical of the theory that the main or whole purpose of the vaccine mandates, and the vaccine in general, was simply money, i.e., that these drug companies bribed politicians to make the population get injected with this stuff by the hundreds of millions so the drug companies would get paid huge amounts for making enormous quantities of drug. It just doesn't make sense, because people weren't charged money for the jab. The sequence of events was:
1. The government paid the drug companies to make billions of doses of drugs,
2. The government then coerced the population into getting those drugs.
The drug companies only wanted the money, they didn't care if they injected their drugs into anyone. They could have bribed politicians to buy their drugs, and then when no one wanted those drugs, they could have simply dumped them into the ocean (those poor fish!) and they would have been just as happy.
This is a widespread theory, though, among people who don't want to believe in "tinfoil hat" ideas such as population reduction or the Great Reset, but cannot deny that there is obviously an ulterior motive in the vaccine push and the way it is being forced on people. When I make this objection, i.e. that the drug companies got paid up front so they had no motive to force those drugs into anyone's arms, they respond by saying that the government "had" to force people to get injected because otherwise people would have been angry that the government had paid so much money to the drug companies to buy the drug in the first place. This makes even less sense, since no one cares if the government wastes money, but people sure as hell care if they get threatened to lose their job unless they inject something into their body that they don't want. So that answer makes even less sense than the first one.
No, there is obviously something in those drugs that the government wants to get into everyone's body. What it is, and what it does, I don't know for sure, but that's obviously the motive here.