CathInfo.com

I've had similar dreams.  In addition, I would establish businesses to employ Traditional Catholics that would split all the profits among the employees ... on top of paying them a fair living wage (depending on how many children they have).

How refreshing.  A man being paid more, depending on how many children he has to support.  I'd like to see a society where this would just be understood, and accepted by everyone, including workingmen who don't have as many children as the fathers of those large families.  (And it could be an incentive for families to have more children, eh?)

Hey, we pay taxes for welfare mothers who have boatloads of kids, so what's the difference?

I just heard the clip (I learned today of a way to get Global News Channel from Canada, among others, on Roku) and it is a classic mental reservation. 

Only problem is, the world outside of Catholicism doesn't draw that distinction, and they just regard such a mental reservation as a lie, IOW, "intent to deceive = lie".  They couldn't care less that we seek to find a way not to divulge information without actually speaking contrary to our own minds.  There is talk of Rodgers being suspended.

But these criminals commit perjury like there's no tomorrow and get away with it ... Fauci repeatedly lying under oath being just the most recent example.  When the questioning is unjust, and the interrogator has no right to know, it is perfectly acceptable to use mental reservation.

In fact, I absolutely agree with those theologians who hold that the "as far as you're concerned" reservation is also perfectly acceptable.  "No, that person is not hiding in my house." [as far as  you're concerned].  I like the example given by the one theologian.  Let's say you're selling fish at the market and you've run out of fish you want to sell, though you still have some in reserve.  Someone asks, "Do you have any more fish?"  Answer:  "No." .. meaning "no, as far as you are concerned" i.e. no more for sale.  RIGHT TO KNOW is a key element of whether one can use mental reservation.  If the person has no right to the truth, you are absolutely entitled to use it.  "Did you ever commit [this sin]?"  Answer:  "No."  Silence or equivocation could result in the person inferring some information that they have no right to.  Someone is attempting to hunt down a Traditional Catholic hiding in your house.  "Is [the person] here in your house."  Answer:  "No, [the person] is NOT in my house."  Keep silent and the person will immediately know that the person is there.