Chicago Hospital halts covid vaccination after many workers have adverse reactions

https://truepundit.com/sick-chicago-hospital-halts-covid-vaccinations-after-multiple-workers-have-adverse-reactions/

Chicago Hospital halts covid vaccination after many workers have adverse reactions

https://truepundit.com/sick-chicago-hospital-halts-covid-vaccinations-after-multiple-workers-have-adverse-reactions/

On that same page there is a link to a Thomas Paine interview with RFK Jr.  You have to skip to around the 55 min mark to get to the part with RFK.  RFK says that if we used Ivermectin? and HCQ at the early stages, we would lower the infection fatality rate down below that of the seasonal flu and that doing that would allow us to get rid of the masks and the lockdowns, etc.  But RFK is apparently accepting the covid death statistics at face value.  Actually, there is ample evidence that the IFR for covid is already below that of seasonal flu.  And yet we are still masking and locking down.  So this covid thing is a total hoax.  Some people believe that there may not even be a new virus at all.  I'm not sure about that but it's not an unreasonable question to ask.  Why do they even need a new virus?  If they can get away with so much fraud, the existence of a new virus is not even necessary.  They can do whatever they want now.  We are pathetic!  The whole world is pathetic.  A virus that may not even exist but if it does exist is no more dangerous than seasonal flu and the world allowed itself to be locked down and masked.  Do you think the antichrist will have any trouble doing whatever he wants?  When Christ returns, will he find faith?
Link: https://truepundit.com/exclusive-robert-f-kennedy-pfizer-moderna-covid-vaccine-nanoparticals-coated-with-toxic-chemical-that-could-prove-deadly/

Oh, and even traditional Catholics are getting ready to line up to pump baby flesh into their arms.  If the antichrist came would anyone even notice?

Luke 18:8:
"But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?"

Four is not many.  RC your posts are great finds, you don't need click bait.

 RC is doing a great job of informing us. 

It's amazing how one can write one thing and have it totally misconstrued.  My comment had nothing to do with the number of your posts.
Your heading said "many workers"
The article heading said "multiple workers"
And the 1st paragraph of the article said "FOUR WORKERS".
My comment referred to your using the word many in place of multiple or four which was misleading.
The articles you post are great finds and benefit us all..  You didn't  need to enhance it.

I agree there's no reason to enhance it.

HOWEVER.

I read the article, and it doesn't say how many vaccines were administered. Did they give out 10,000 vaccines, or 10?

I'm thinking it's closer to the 10.

If they gave 20 shots, and they had 4 serious adverse reactions, that's TOO MANY, MANY, SEVERAL and/or MULTIPLE in my book.

Would you take a vaccine where 20% or 25% of the recipients had severe adverse reactions? Neither would I.