Im open to correction on this, but outside of adverse health effects mentioned earlier, my first impression is that’s it’s no different than protein powder (ie., a legal, non-euphoria, non-abortive supplement).
Like so many things, "it depends."
Baseline free testosterone at onset? Total testosterone levels are worthless because most of the total is bound to SBG sex-binding globulins; it is the free component that is physiologically effective. goal level at steady-state treatment? If low initially and goal is normalization, few problems. If normal initially and goal is supra-maximal levels, more problems.
Diversion of testosterone into the female hormone pathways? Some use anastrazole, an aromatase inhibitor, to block diversion of test to 5HT (baldness) and female hormones (boobs). Anastrazole is far more danger to the heart than testosterone itself. Testosterone used to be a standard treatment for cardiac ischemia.
Manner of test delivery? repository oil injections? = oil microembolism problems and markedly fluctuating levels. pellets? even more wildly fluctuating levels with supra-max levels with initial pellet placement (trochar injections anyone???) topicals? = spousal exposure (sleep in the same bed, linens, body-to-body contact) = double-edged sword = increase wife's libido v. virilize wife application site? wives report that taste is an issue for a particular standard application site which topical? alcohol-based vehicle? ("burns" so limits available application sites) compounded cream? (oooey-gooey but doesn't burn, vehicle not as well absorbed)
testicle shrinkage (think "raisins")
There are so many serious considerations that a doctor's visit (with a knowledgeable doc) makes a lot more sense than generic online or gym rat lore (and illicit sources).
P.S. As for protein powder, rarely justified. I hoard some as a hedge for the family against kwashiorkor in the times of hunger ahead. If someone can afford protein powder in the USA, they can afford a balanced diet and have no need for protein powder.