Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Explosive: a review of fake medical tests  (Read 639 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5565
  • Reputation: +2025/-40
  • Gender: Male
Explosive: a review of fake medical tests
« on: January 30, 2018, 08:46:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Explosive: a review of fake medical diagnostic tests
    (To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
    Explosive: a review of fake medical tests
     
    By Jon Rappoport
     
    Over the years, during my investigations of deep fraud, I've uncovered very popular medical diagnostic tests that are wrong-headed, misleading, and fallacious.
     
    Acceptance of this shocking truth would disrupt the "disease business" like a threshing machine moving through a wheat field.
     
    Claims of diseases, based on tests, would be routinely turned back stamped UNPROVEN and FAKE.
     
    ONE: Antibody test. This is given to detect the presence of a specific germ in a human. Prior to 1985, a positive test was generally taken as a sign of good health: the patient's immune system detected the germ and defeated it.
     
    However, after 1985, public health agencies and doctors reversed field. They arbitrarily claimed a positive test showed the person was ill or was going to become ill. No true science backed up this claim.
     
    BOTTOM LINE: The truth is, a positive antibody test says nothing about whether a person is ill, will get ill, or is healthy. The true indicator is the strength of the entire immune system, not just the antibodies---and the overall strength of the immune system is NOT measured by an antibody test. THERE IS NO MEDICAL TEST THAT MEASURES THE OVERALL CONDITION OF A PERSON'S IMMUNE SYSTEM.
     
    TWO: The PCR test. The Polymerase Chain Reaction tests for the presence of virus in a patient. The test takes a tiny sample, which technicians assume is a genetic piece of a virus far too small to observe, and amplifies it many times, so it can be identified. But in order to cause disease in a human, a huge quantity of virus (easily observed without the PCR) needs to be present. Therefore, a PCR test-result indicates nothing about disease---except that medical personnel couldn't find enough virus in a person, to begin with, to assume the person was ill or would become ill.
     
    THREE: All tests resulting in a diagnosis of any of the 300 officially certified mental disorders. Why? Because there are no definitive tests. No blood or saliva or urine tests. No genetic assays. No brain scans. All so-called mental disorders are diagnosed on the basis of consulting menus of behaviors. This is pseudoscience. It's on the level of diagnosing cancer in a patient on the basis of an interview.
     
    FOUR: All tests designed to assess the effectiveness of vaccines. The only marker is: does the vaccine produce antibodies in a human. But as I stated above, antibodies are only one aspect of the immune system. They aren't the whole picture. A weak immune system's antibodies are useless.
     
    FIVE: Unsupported claims from public health officials. No tests at all, or hidden test results. For example, at the height of the so-called Swine Flu epidemic, in the fall of 2009, the CDC secretly stopped counting cases in America. Why? Because the overwhelming percentage of samples taken from the most likely Swine Flu patients, sent to labs, were coming back with no trace of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu. In other words, the epidemic was a dud and a hoax. Based on this vacuum of evidence, the CDC went on to estimate that, in America, there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu.
     
    This gigantic scandal doesn't just apply to Swine Flu. It applies to any kind of flu.
     
    Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.
     
    As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
     
    This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies. So they don't have the flu.
     
    Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu cases.
     
    The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
     
    The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
     
    Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review, "Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
     
    "...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem because most 'flu' appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive."
     
    "...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
     
    Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
     
    So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you're on the short end of the stick here. They're conning your socks off.
     
    The basic flu symptoms---cough, fever, chills, sore throat, muscle aches, weakness---can be caused by a variety of factors that have nothing to do with a flu virus.
     
    ---But don't worry, be happy. Keep your mouth shut and obey all doctors' orders.

    You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.com.

    Offline songbird

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3302
    • Reputation: +1220/-63
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Explosive: a review of fake medical tests
    « Reply #1 on: January 30, 2018, 10:34:10 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thank you for this post.  About 5 years ago, my husband went to a medical CE course to keep his Pharmacy Technician licenses, up.  The CE was in the Phoenix area and it was on inoculations.  After the course, doctors were mad.  Their CEO's were sending out mandatory letters to all staff to take the flu shot.  The shot was a "3 parter" they were told.  Truth was, it was a 4 parter!  The 4th part was "other".   Anyone's guess!  After 3  years of trying the mandatory route, it finally came to a stop.  I am sure they will try again.

    Some may overlook, that those people who walk into the hospital, non-staff, can be bringing in the virus/germs to hospitals.  No one is stopped at the door to ask if they had a flu shot.


    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4414
    • Reputation: +3796/-230
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Explosive: a review of fake medical tests
    « Reply #2 on: January 30, 2018, 10:54:11 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • THREE: All tests resulting in a diagnosis of any of the 300 officially certified mental disorders. Why? Because there are no definitive tests. No blood or saliva or urine tests. No genetic assays. No brain scans. All so-called mental disorders are diagnosed on the basis of consulting menus of behaviors. This is pseudoscience. It's on the level of diagnosing cancer in a patient on the basis of an interview.
     

    This is precisely why virtually all (if not all) diagnoses of autism are bunk.

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16