Why has RC1953 posted this completely pointless and fact-light story? What precisely is the angle it is pushing? Or put otherwise, what is it trying to get us angry about?
The number of questions certainly doesn't stop at three. Even assuming the truth of the story's claims, was asthma the dead doctor's only complicating factor? True or not, why would a trained physician wear the same mask hour after hour, day after day, when she ought to have known full well that the mask would have become a Petri dish for respiratory-system microbes in a matter of hours—indeed, much less time than that? Further to the matter of ignorance, could it possibly be that the physicians who treated the doctor did not know that putting a patient with asthma aggravated by a virus that attacks lung function was a procedure almost guaranteed to kill her?
Then there's the talk about the covid test used on the now-dead doctor and presumably on a great many others. Is this the vaunted PCR test, used nationwide, that both the New York Times and the CDC now admit gives false results at least 90 percent of the time? (This percentage of failure is sheer baloney, by the way; the inaccuracy rate is effectively 100 percent.) Incidentally, why aren't the people at the Times, the CDC, and the Texas hospital familiar with what the test's inventor, Dr. Kary Mullis, the late Nobelist in Chemistry, said about the PCR process (NB: Mullis never called it a test!): "You cannot use this test to prove infectious etiology or diagnose infectious disease." Given this definitive judgment from the man best positioned to know what PCR can and cannot tell researchers, why should a reader give any credence to anything in the story beyond the presumably factual report of Doctor Fagan's passing?
I have at least seven more questions to pose, but why bother? The posting is worthless propaganda. The only worthwhile question is, why is it even here?
Topic: Doctor who died of CV was wearing a mask for weeks (Read 363 times)