Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Health and Nutrition => Topic started by: Ladislaus on May 03, 2021, 08:24:25 AM

Title: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Ladislaus on May 03, 2021, 08:24:25 AM
So this study, released on April 30 2021, indicates that much of the damage attributed to CÖVÌD comes from the SPIKE PROTEINS themselves, and not the virus.

So big pharma creates a jab that turns the body into a spike protein factory.

https://tinyurl.com/4a4xdra3

Quote
In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.

The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells (which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2. This binding disrupted ACE2’s molecular signaling to mitochondria (organelles that generate energy for cells), causing the mitochondria to become damaged and fragmented.

This explains the damage being caused by the jabs and is absolutely huge.  It totally destroys the jab and exposes it as a bioweapon.

Title: Re: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Ladislaus on May 03, 2021, 08:26:30 AM
Ivermectin blocks the spike proteins from binding to the ACE2 receptors.
Title: Re: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Ladislaus on May 03, 2021, 08:35:12 AM
This guy is really boring to watch, but informative.

Starting at about 4:28, he talks about how the spike protein itself can't replicate, so if you're just exposed to some by shedding, that's much less of a problem than when you have a jab created billions of these things.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fz0H5vMJFMc

As he points out, this clearly invalidates the entire jab model.  Instead of doing good, the jab is causing and will cause massive damage.

He writes it off as a "mistake" but most of us here know it was quite deliberate.

Title: Re: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Pax Vobis on May 03, 2021, 08:40:49 AM

Quote
So big pharma creates a jab that turns the body into a spike protein factory.

Great info.  This lines up with Dr Judy Murkovits (spelling) and Dr Tenpenny have been saying since the start.
Title: Re: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Ladislaus on May 03, 2021, 10:15:05 AM
Great info.  This lines up with Dr Judy Murkovits (spelling) and Dr Tenpenny have been saying since the start.

Well, if you recall from the earliest weeks of "COVID" there were doctors out there vocally asserting that this was a blood disease and not a respiratory disease.  

This Salk study totally backs this up, but it took them 15 months to catch up.

We know darn well that the jab manufacturers know all this and know it well.  This thing was a bioweapon.

Good news in that video I posted (of the "boring" guy above) is that the spike proteins themselves cannot replicate.  Listen from about the 4:26 mark.  Consequently, getting these by shedding isn't anywhere near the same thing as having your body constantly producing billions and trillions of these things.

THIS is why most of the deaths from the jab are similar to what they claimed from COVID, namely, blood related things:  clotting, heart attacks, strokes, seizures (perhaps related to blood flow in brain like strokes).  That is why Blood Type O people seem to have a much easier time with COVID than other Blood Types.

For some people this sets in immediately and then kills them.  But the "soft kill" aspect of this weapon is that people will start developing heart and circulatory issues months and years down the road, and they'll be inclined to write them off as coincidence rather than as a result of the jab.

It's actually quite brilliant how they pulled this whole thing off.
Title: Re: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Last Tradhican on May 04, 2021, 04:48:12 PM
Excellent find, thanks.
Title: Re: CÖVÌD: Salk Institute study: damage from spike proteins, not virus itself
Post by: Cera on May 04, 2021, 05:00:32 PM
Well, if you recall from the earliest weeks of "CÖVÌD" there were doctors out there vocally asserting that this was a blood disease and not a respiratory disease.  

This Salk study totally backs this up, but it took them 15 months to catch up.

We know darn well that the jab manufacturers know all this and know it well.  This thing was a bioweapon.

Good news in that video I posted (of the "boring" guy above) is that the spike proteins themselves cannot replicate.  Listen from about the 4:26 mark.  Consequently, getting these by shedding isn't anywhere near the same thing as having your body constantly producing billions and trillions of these things.

THIS is why most of the deaths from the jab are similar to what they claimed from CÖVÌD, namely, blood related things:  clotting, heart attacks, strokes, seizures (perhaps related to blood flow in brain like strokes).  That is why Blood Type O people seem to have a much easier time with CÖVÌD than other Blood Types.

For some people this sets in immediately and then kills them.  But the "soft kill" aspect of this weapon is that people will start developing heart and circulatory issues months and years down the road, and they'll be inclined to write them off as coincidence rather than as a result of the jab.

It's actually quite brilliant how they pulled this whole thing off.
Thank you for posting all of this. Now we see the big picture and it's ugly.

Demonic intellect is superior to human intellect.

However, we have the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Rosary, and the knowledge that our suffering is precious to God.


He alludes to his protocol in the video. Here is part of it.
Every disease needs to be considered and addressed at three main stages:
Prophylaxis or prevention of disease in the Monotti Protocol is considered easily achievable mainly through point 2, vitamin D supplementation, a varied diet full of fresh vegetables and fruits, and regular exercise with sufficient sleeping patterns. The goal of early treatment is to prevent late treatment, when the disease has already progressed to a severe stage as this will both put the patient’s health at risk and cause unnecessary pressure on hospitals and healthcare systems.
The earlier the treatment the better, and as many pharmacies are able to provide for SARSCoV2 testing, a doctor’s visit at the first symptoms is not even required. Early treatment kits should be available off the shelf from pharmacies and for home deliveries.
Vitamin C (https://c19vitaminc.com/) is always a good idea for the treatment of all respiratory infections. Many doctors recommend 1g twice a day during treatment.
Zinc is known to limit viral replication in human cells (https://academic.oup.com/advances/article/10/4/696/5476413), and it is aided in its entry into cells by a zinc ionophore (https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1001176), such as hydroxychloroquine (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304258), quercetin, or epigallocatechin gallate (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25050823/) or EGCG.
Omega-3 (https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-021-02795-5) supplementation improved the levels of several parameters of respiratory and renal function in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Ivermectin (https://ivmmeta.com/) is also known to limit viral replication.
Early administration of inhaled budesonide (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(21)00160-0/fulltext#figures) reduced the likelihood of needing urgent medical care and reduced time to recovery after early COVID-19.
Aspirin (https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2021/04000/Aspirin_Use_Is_Associated_With_Decreased.2.aspx) use is associated with decreased mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and mortality
Macrolides (clarithromycin or azithromycin) are known to reduce the length of the disease (https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-181996/v1) and the time required to test negative.
Other treatments may be available at the discretion of the pharmacy, however all need to have been considered safe medicines for many years before their inclusion in a treatment kit. For this reason the treatment kits should include only existing or repurposed medicines rather than new or experimental treatments.
Early treatment will considerably reduce the number of patients for whom the disease will progress to a possible hospitalisation stage, as most respiratory diseases can be treated at home if treatment is began early enough. There is no reason for treatment to be delayed, as this is what ultimately can put a patient’s life at risk.
For the medicines to be included in possible early treatment kits also see:
The Zelenko Protocol (https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/zelenko-treatment-protocol/)
I-Mask+ Protocol (https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/)