So the propaganda in the U.S. (CNN headline today) has been that only the unjabbed will be hit by Delta variant.

Meanwhile, the propaganda in the UK has been that the jabbed are more at risk from Dekta.  That’s because they have a much higher jab rate ... so they need to find more excuses for lσcкdσωn.  I’ll post the BBC story later.

So they’re caught in contradictory lies.  Logic 101 indicates that at least one of them is lying.  In truth, both are.  There likely is no Delta variant, and the Delta deaths are jab deaths.

They have dumbed down the sheep so badly that they can even get them to believe contradictory propositions at the same time.  They’ve outdone themselves.

If you have a chance to post where you saw those news articles it would be great. Many thanks. Hard to keep up with all the propaganda.

I don't think it's the same one, but here's another from CNN, expressing a similar sentiment:
The Delta variant is so contagious, those unprotected will likely get it, a Trump administration FDA chief says - CNN

Since February, 97% of cases and deaths related to CÖVÌD-19 in Louisiana were among people not fully ναccιnαted, Gov. John Bel Edwards said Friday.

Now Louisiana is about 36% fully ναccιnαted, so 36% of people are accounting for only ~3% of cases. 10x less likely to catch it than everyone else, apparently.

However, in the UK, almost half of CÖVÌD cases are in people with 1 or more vaccine doses. 47% to be precise. Now of course, there's a difference there in that that figure includes people with just 1 dose of the vaccine. But, for the sake of argument, let's be extremely lenient to them and assume that not one of those cases was in someone who was fully ναccιnαted. Let's blame it all on those 1 dosers who aren't "fully vaxxed" yet. That would still mean ~18%(63% with 1 dose minus 47% with 2 doses at the time) of the population accounted for 47% of cases. Well that would be absurd, and mean that having 1 dose somehow makes you far more likely to catch it. So either that's the case, which itself would suggest the vaxx is bad news, or else the people with 2 doses are still making up a very large proportion of cases: 29% if we assume 1 dosers to be a proportional 18%, which would still mean 0 protection granted to 1 dosers. If we assume 1 dosers got some protection, that 29% goes up again.

As you can see, there's a very stark difference between 29% MINIMUM in the UK and 3% in Louisiana. 47% may be larger than 36%, but not nearly enough to explain how the fully ναccιnαted make up a ten times greater proportion of cases in the UK. Somehow the vaccines are less effective in places with greater rates of vaccination. Not suspicious at all...

Notice they group cases (which could be false id of the common cold or allergies or false readings of CÖVÌD or real CÖVÌD that did nothing to the person.),  with deaths, which could be just 2 people with pre-existing serious issues or that died in a motorcycle accident.

So you get the common cold, test positive for CÖVÌD (nevermind why you submitted to the test), nothing bad happens to you, and you become part of the statistics why the unvaxxed are "at risk" from "the virus". One more "COVID CASE" among the unvaxxed!

Or those who die of old age (usually) or any other cause -- getting falsely put down as COVID death.

SEE? The Boogeyman is GETTING the UNVAXXED. The Boogeyman is gonna get you! Better get safe and take your experimental poison jab!

It's so transparent, and all so tiresome.