Now if only lightning would strike Silver-mann.That's evil. PURE EVIL.
That's evil. PURE EVIL.Hoping for the death of a public blasphemer and enemy of Christ is not at all evil. The exact opposite, actually.
If you watch the vid closely, you can see her eyes looking upward right before she hit the deck, as though maybe she perceived an invisible Someone above doing this to her.Your comments are ridiculous. There are multiple explanations for what could have happened that we will never know. Say a prayer for her and keep your lousy analysis on hold. Who cares?
It was also weird how she at first took quick little steps and then almost a brief semi-squatting position, as though something was first pushing or dragging her, then pushing her down, then she lets out a little grunt (as though pushed with force) before abruptly flopping backward.
Of course, when you faint, your eyes might roll up into your head too.
But no reason it couldn't be for both reasons.
Comedian Mocks Jesus and Collapses ImmediatelyI thought it was a chaff video to make anti-vaxers and Catholics look like fools when they believe it, so I looked it up in the regular media and they said she passed out and cracked her skull. I went back and played it in slow motion and saw that her head snapped back and crashed hard onto the floor.
... the majority of the audience were too stupid to get her help right away.
That's evil. PURE EVIL.
Your comments are ridiculous. There are multiple explanations for what could have happened that we will never know. Say a prayer for her and keep your lousy analysis on hold. Who cares?:facepalm: You're on a message board and you're telling people to "keep your lousy analysis on hold"? :laugh1: That's the entire purpose of this site. :laugh2: Grow up.
:facepalm: You're on a message board and you're telling people to "keep your lousy analysis on hold"? :laugh1: That's the entire purpose of this site. :laugh2: Grow up.Here we go again.
That's only because they had no idea that it wasn't part of her act.Never heard of her and not at all funny, even without the blasphemy. I actually thought it was part of the act, as well, including the first two men who came out to help. I’m STILL not sure, but guess I’ll need to look it up. Jesus certainly could have struck her down, not so much for her, but for the woke audience to learn a lesson.
Never heard of her and not at all funny, even without the blasphemy. I actually thought it was part of the act, as well, including the first two men who came out to help. I’m STILL not sure, but guess I’ll need to look it up. Jesus certainly could have struck her down, not so much for her, but for the woke audience to learn a lesson.
I actually thought it was part of the act, as well, including the first two men who came out to help. I’m STILL not sure, but guess I’ll need to look it up. Jesus certainly could have struck her down, not so much for her, but for the woke audience to learn a lesson.
Yes. When she announced that she still had menstrual periods, then squatted and wiggled her knees to and fro, I almost barfed.I thought someone said she was Jєωιѕн. If so, it’s unlikely she went to novus ordo schools. And no, making jokes about your menstrual periods is just nasty, for anyone!
She went to Novus Ordo schools. She is poisoned fruit.
Hoping for the death of a public blasphemer and enemy of Christ is not at all evil. The exact opposite, actually.
:facepalm: You're on a message board and you're telling people to "keep your lousy analysis on hold"? :laugh1: That's the entire purpose of this site. :laugh2: Grow up.If you and some others here aren't capable of noticing someone that is in immediate need of medical attention (the woman that was stumbling before she fell), that's not my problem. I could see things going sideways (no pun intended) as soon as she got off the stool. But that's not the point. The point is that no matter why she fell, even if her blood pressure temporarily dropped, or she had not eaten a meal, or perhaps it was hot in the environment, or whatever it was, some people just are not capable of thinking anything beside "oh, it's the vaxx!" In other words, they have a new and convenient excuse to blame anything and everything on the vaxx, regardless of how ridiculous it might be. They can now virtue signal all they want about their ignorance of many things.
Also, women are not funny.SOME women are not funny. This woman that fell is not funny. There are plenty of women that are, and have been funny. Lucille Ball is one example of a funny woman. She is no longer living, but she was funny, and her reruns are still funny.
Now if only lightning would strike Silver-mann.
Who is Silver-mann?She's another entertainment Jew.
:confused:
Wrong. We are not supposed to wish the death or harm of anyone. It's up to God to deal with each person.Actually… https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07149b.htm (https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07149b.htm)
#1) ... the statement was offered largely tongue-in-cheekI took your comment literally, as in, you were wishing for God to send a lightning strike to this Silverman lady. In other words, you wouldn't be unhappy if lightning (or I guess some other calamity) befell her. Tongue in cheek? Hmmm, I didn't take it like that, as I said.
#2) in that context, it was mostly a commentary on the depravity of her blasphemy, making the woman in the OP look tame by comparison.
Both of these should have been obvious from the phrase "Now if only ..."
God would be right to smite her for the incredibly depraved blasphemies that woman has uttered. Of course, I would not take it upon my own authority to apply capital punishment to her, but I would fully support a Catholic state to judge her guilty of blasphemy and condemn her to death.
For all that you denounce everyone else here as "evil", "PURE evil", you're really hands down THE most judgmental and arrogant person on this forum. You'll call me "PURE evil", but then you wouldn't say that of Sarah Silverman, would you? I'm guessing that the most depraved blasphemies possible is not big deal vs. condemning her blasphemies. She boasted that she was glad that they put Our Lord to death and would do it again.
It's the old hypocrisy of judging people for being judgmental.
It's like that other thread where you say, "Thank God I am not like that Pharisee."
…But anyway, we are not supposed to wish harm to others, period.…
Since you repeat your error, I must repeat the antidote.It is good to see that quote to remind us how much we must hate moral errors that ravage Christian people. I want everyone to notice that it specifically says moral law errors, for moral ravages are siren songs that lure Christians to hell, contrary to physical chastisements like torture, killings, wars, and starvation, which actually serve to convert people and save them for all eternity.
(http://judaism.is/images/pray%20for%20death%20of%20heresiarch.jpg?crc=3794656841)
If you read, then re-read what I said. You quoted me, so read it. I did NOT say you were evil. Big difference. Wishing harm for someone else is evil.
We are not supposed to wish the death or harm of anyone.Yes and no. Your statement has a twinge of protestantism. Yes, I cannot wish "evil" upon someone else, for that is a sin of anger. No, death is not an evil, because we all must/will die. Death is only an evil in the minds of pagans because they love this life more than they should. And protestants view suffering as "evil" because they are "already saved" so they falsely expect only "happy" things from God and this life. Praying for someone's death, because it will be a spiritual benefit, is not a "harm" because death is unavoidable. We are just praying for a change in the timeline.
Yes and no. Your statement has a twinge of protestantism. Yes, I cannot wish "evil" upon someone else, for that is a sin of anger. No, death is not an evil, because we all must/will die. Death is only an evil in the minds of pagans because they love this life more than they should. And protestants view suffering as "evil" because they are "already saved" so they falsely expect only "happy" things from God and this life. Praying for someone's death, because it will be a spiritual benefit, is not a "harm" because death is unavoidable. We are just praying for a change in the timeline.Well said. It is MERCIFUL AND JUST that a public blasphemer die. It is MERCIFUL because before they dig themselves into an even deeper pit in Hell, their time here is cut short. And it is JUST because the SECOND COMMANDMENT, states that we MUST NOT take the Lord's name in vain.
When you say "timeline", you're suggesting that time travel is possible, or being done. It gets into that alternate timelines, alternate parallel universes sci-fi nonsense.I see your point but that's not what I was saying. The future, from a human understanding, is not set. When we pray for something to happen, we don't know if this prayer will be answered or not (it's up to God's wisdom). If no one prayed for +Francis to die sooner, then logically he would live longer than if we did pray. So, in this sense, we are asking God to adjust the "timeline" of His original plan (i.e. from our understanding). Just like when Joshua asked God to not let the sun set and the day was longer than normal. The original "timeline" was a 24 hour day which God's power altered due to prayer. But God knew from all eternity that Joshua would pray for this, so He ordered nature to comply.
P.S. Talk of "timelines" does to God and His Providence what cremation does to belief in the Resurrection of the Body on the Last Day.
Actually… https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07149b.htm (https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07149b.htm)I was taught it as being called divine mercy:
(http://judaism.is/images/pray%20for%20death%20of%20heresiarch.jpg?crc=3794656841)
Since you repeat your error, I must repeat the antidote.Ah Mark, truly priceless. A full-blown sedevacantist (Mark) is repeatedly choosing to quote a Novus Ordo website to suit his whims. That's comedy, Mark!
(http://judaism.is/images/pray%20for%20death%20of%20heresiarch.jpg?crc=3794656841)
I was taught it as being called divine mercy:Hey, hello, earth to Epiphany, "obstinate sinners" can be the the CI guy that has a porn addiction, or the CI guy that pleasures himself and does zip to stop his habit, and so on.
the the Lord ends the life of someone obstinate in sin to help prevent them from reaching a deeper pit in hell.
I was also taught that it is an act of charity to pray for divine mercy for obstinate sinners.
this explains it pretty well:
https://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/On%20the%20Abuse%20of%20Divine%20Mercy.html
Therefore the Lord waiteth, that he may have mercy on you." (Isa. xxx. 1, 8.) But when He sees that the time which he gave them to weep over their past iniquities is spent in multiplying their sins, He begins to inflict chastisement, and He cuts them off in the state of sin, that, by dying, they may cease to offend Him.
Yes and no. Your statement has a twinge of protestantism. Yes, I cannot wish "evil" upon someone else, for that is a sin of anger. No, death is not an evil, because we all must/will die. Death is only an evil in the minds of pagans because they love this life more than they should. And protestants view suffering as "evil" because they are "already saved" so they falsely expect only "happy" things from God and this life. Praying for someone's death, because it will be a spiritual benefit, is not a "harm" because death is unavoidable. We are just praying for a change in the timeline.Malarky. "Love your neighbour as yourself." It's the Second Greatest Commandment of all. It has absolutely nothing to do with Protestants.
I see your point but that's not what I was saying. The future, from a human understanding, is not set. When we pray for something to happen, we don't know if this prayer will be answered or not (it's up to God's wisdom). If no one prayed for +Francis to die sooner, then logically he would live longer than if we did pray. So, in this sense, we are asking God to adjust the "timeline" of His original plan (i.e. from our understanding). Just like when Joshua asked God to not let the sun set and the day was longer than normal. The original "timeline" was a 24 hour day which God's power altered due to prayer. But God knew from all eternity that Joshua would pray for this, so He ordered nature to comply.Oh, so it's okay for people to pray for you to die sooner, too? Or does your flavour of "logic" only apply to Pope Francis?
Ultimately, since God knows all things, and since He has foreseen all prayers before the world was even created, He knew which prayers He would answer and which He would not, so there is only 1 timeline - that of His eternal, all-wise, all-loving Providence. But since we humans don't know God's timeline, and since time is a temporal thing, speaking of "changing the timeline" is just my way of praying for God's will.
Watching you guys argue with Anne (give her a platform) is like watching a Jerry Lewis movie, excruciating, I don't watch.:laugh1: classic Far Side
To each his own.
What Anne writes and what others should read blah,blah,blah,blah Anne, blah,blah,blah,blah, Anne, blah,blah,blah,blah AnneAgree. It's become apparent that Anne hasn't been Catholic very long, or doesn't possess enough Catholic thinking.
It is good to see that quote to remind us how much we must hate moral errors that ravage Christian people. I want everyone to notice that it specifically says moral law errors, for moral ravages are siren songs that lure Christians to hell, contrary to physical chastisements like torture, killings, wars, and starvation, which actually serve to convert people and save them for all eternity.I got totally lost with your post, but it seems to be directed to Mark, and that's fine. But IF you are trying to say that you wouldn't wish hell on anyone with your end paragraph, than I agree with you.
That female comedian did not die, let us hope that this collapse and fall at the point where she takes the Lord's Name in vain, serves to convert her (which would be a miracle) or other people, for if she dies in her current state of soul, she will without a doubt go to hell for all eternity. (P.S.- her blasphemies are a dust mite compared to the Elephant of moral law errors trumpeted by the Vatican II popes and all the clergy that expound the same)
Here's a question on the subject of hell:
If a man came into your home and you saw him kill your wife and children while you were tied up, at what point would you be satisfied that he has been physically punished by tortures from the authorities. Say he was scourged as Our Lord was scourged at the pillar in Mel Gibson's movie, or the man is beaten to a pulp, to one inch of death by twelve steel toed booted men, then taken to a hospital for the time and operations necessary to bring him back to enough health, and then once again scourged or beaten to one inch of death, and this goes on for all eternity. If you had to witness these tortures. At what point would you say that you were satisfied? Two or three beatings? Maybe five? Well, Hell is beatings for all eternity, every day. One can "say" they would not be satisfied for anything short of eternity, but it is another thing to witness it.
Blah blah blah presumption blah blah blah judgment blah blah blah hatred of Traddies blah blah blahMatthew, why do you suffer this woman's presence here?
It seems to be a pattern that starts like this: Hate the Pope, hate X, hate y, hate, hate, hate. So who ends up as being more hateful? Sede vacantists, or home aloners? Hmmm...
That's evil. PURE EVIL.What Silverman says about Our Lord is PURE EVIL. And yet most people won’t defend our Lord. Most of Hollywood is pure evil.
:laugh1: classic Far Side
I look at it as taking a little time off of Purgatory to suffer her inane ramblings. About as pleasant as bashing my head against a wall.
(https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxv3mlwibL1r2qgn1.gif)
Matthew, why do you suffer this woman's presence here?
Anne to Nishant: I really have to say now that joining here was a part of a penance for myself.Matthew wants us to do more penance, eh, Matthew?
Part of that penance involves standing up to correct some of the very same things that I myself may have done in the past, and that is bullying others to topics in the Faith, or otherwise being on my high horse over them.
Matthew wants us to do more penance, eh, Matthew?Matthew: Purgatory warden.
and that is bullying others to topics in the Faith, or otherwise being on my high horse over them.:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
It seems to be a pattern that starts like this: Hate the Pope, hate X, hate y, hate, hate, hate. So who ends up as being more hateful? Sede vacantists, or home aloners? Hmmm...
Matthew, why do you suffer this woman's presence here?
Hoping for the death of a public blasphemer and enemy of Christ is not at all evil. The exact opposite, actually.
If you watch the vid closely, you can see her eyes looking upward right before she hit the deck, as though maybe she perceived an invisible Someone above doing this to her.
It was also weird how she at first took quick little steps and then almost a brief semi-squatting position, as though something was first pushing or dragging her, then pushing her down, then she lets out a little grunt (as though pushed with force) before abruptly flopping backward.
Of course, when you faint, your eyes might roll up into your head too.
But no reason it couldn't be for both reasons.
Says she got all the vaccines so Jesus loves her the most, then bites the dust (YouTube deletion imminent and certain):And the follow up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctPViK3LK-o
And the follow up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiTHfUojsT4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiTHfUojsT4)
PRAY FOR HER! STOP commenting and PRAY FOR HER! YOU WEAR GLASSES. I pray you NEVER have a skull fracture! YOU would be wearing them, too. She has a concussion! "Neat trick to hide her eyes." How ignorant! Have YOU ever had a concussion? I HAVE! They are NO fun!
Foolish old lady. Go back and play with the 'roos and let them give it you, and you would end up with a skull fracture if they happened to knock you over with their tails. Look up what a skull fracture is. Look up the various types and what they do to people.
You are an embarrassment to the 75 and up crowd.
You are embarrassing to ALL persons of goodwill at the moment! I pray you never become wholly dependent on someone else for all your activities of daily living--bathing, showering, changing your clothes, feeding you, etc. You will indeed be singing a different tune.
She needs PRAYERS! PRAYERS! Please PRAY FOR HER. You are beyond old enough to be setting a good example. Start setting one. Disgusting.
PRAY FOR HER! STOP commenting and PRAY FOR HER! YOU WEAR GLASSES.
No repentance shown in this follow up. Here she even repeats the same blasphemous jokes and she hopes to repeat her performance (sans fractures of course). Neat trick to hide her eyes.
Though shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
PRAY FOR HER! STOP commenting and PRAY FOR HER! YOU WEAR GLASSES. I pray you NEVER have a skull fracture! YOU would be wearing them, too. She has a concussion! "Neat trick to hide her eyes." How ignorant! Have YOU ever had a concussion? I HAVE! They are NO fun!(https://i.imgur.com/bw2CjT3.png)
Foolish old lady. Go back and play with the 'roos and let them give it you, and you would end up with a skull fracture if they happened to knock you over with their tails. Look up what a skull fracture is. Look up the various types and what they do to people.
You are an embarrassment to the 75 and up crowd.
You are embarrassing to ALL persons of goodwill at the moment! I pray you never become wholly dependent on someone else for all your activities of daily living--bathing, showering, changing your clothes, feeding you, etc. You will indeed be singing a different tune.
She needs PRAYERS! PRAYERS! Please PRAY FOR HER. You are beyond old enough to be setting a good example. Start setting one. Disgusting.
"How ignorant!It is time for silence woman!
Foolish old lady.
You are an embarrassment to the 75 and up crowd.
You are embarrassing to ALL persons of goodwill at the moment!
I pray you never become wholly dependent on someone else for all your activities of daily living--bathing, showering, changing your clothes, feeding you, etc. You will indeed be singing a different tune.
You are beyond old enough to be setting a good example. Start setting one. Disgusting.
PRAY FOR HER! STOP commenting and PRAY FOR HER! YOU WEAR GLASSES. I pray you NEVER have a skull fracture! YOU would be wearing them, too. She has a concussion! "Neat trick to hide her eyes." How ignorant! Have YOU ever had a concussion? I HAVE! They are NO fun!The comedian blasphemed by mocking Jesus. You should be angry at her not Nadir. It is mean to say that Nadir is a foolish old lady and for her to play with Roos. I like Nadir.
Foolish old lady. Go back and play with the 'roos and let them give it you, and you would end up with a skull fracture if they happened to knock you over with their tails. Look up what a skull fracture is. Look up the various types and what they do to people.
You are an embarrassment to the 75 and up crowd.
You are embarrassing to ALL persons of goodwill at the moment! I pray you never become wholly dependent on someone else for all your activities of daily living--bathing, showering, changing your clothes, feeding you, etc. You will indeed be singing a different tune.
She needs PRAYERS! PRAYERS! Please PRAY FOR HER. You are beyond old enough to be setting a good example. Start setting one. Disgusting.
(https://i.imgur.com/bw2CjT3.png)Heh. Reminds me of a Beverly Hillbillies episode, The Giant Jackrabbit:
and you get this!
(https://i.imgur.com/RpaQCdI.png)
Matthew, why do you suffer this woman's [Ann] presence here?Give no issue to thy water, no, not a little: nor to a wicked woman liberty to gad abroad. If she walk not at thy hand, she will confound thee in the sight of thy enemies. Cut her off from thy flesh, lest she always abuse thee. ~ Ecclesiasticus 25:34-36
And the follow up:She didn't learn a thing. Nothing. Just one big joke to her. :facepalm:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiTHfUojsT4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiTHfUojsT4)
No repentance shown in this follow up. Here she even repeats the same blasphemous jokes and she hopes to repeat her performance (sans fractures of course). Neat trick to hide her eyes.
Though shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
She didn't learn a thing. Nothing. Just one big joke to her. :facepalm:
That's good at least. Prayers for her that she learns all she needs to.
Finally she did learn something.
https://youtu.be/0ml0UhlQxBk
Start at 1'03".
That's good at least. Prayers for her that she learns all she needs to.They're still a couple of morons:
They're still a couple of morons:Still poor Heather is learning. Some people learn more slowly than others.
Dr Drew: "I still think it's worth the risk"
Heather: "I don't think I'm going to get the 4th shot".
Do we really think she blasphemed? What she said was irreverent, certainly, but not all irreverence is blasphemy. Was waiting for the thread to die down a little to ask that question.Thou shalt not use the Lord thy God's Name in vain.
My question, to be clear, is not meant to suggest what she said was good or right. It was neither. Just wondering if blasphemy is the correct category for it.
Thanks 2vt. Good stuff. I agree.You're welcome Mith. Your question was a good one! Sometimes it's not so clear cut.