The thing is, I don't need the nanotech conspiracy theory vindicated to be VIRULENTLY against the jab.
And anyone who's been on CI longer than 5 minutes should know -- there's nothing wrong with conspiracy theories. It is just a theory (lacking video or photographic evidence or other hard proof) regarding 2 or more men getting together in secret to work some plan. Do you think men never plan things in secret? Or do you think that when they DO plan something, they dutifully announce it to the world? What kind of naive idiot would believe that?
But the nanotech angle, as you call it, IS literally a conspiracy theory. It's a theory about one aspect of this COVID conspiracy.
But back to my point: even if it turned out that there were ZERO graphene and ZERO nanotech particles, etc. in the vaccine -- I would still treat someone trying to jab me by force the same way I'd treat someone trying to shoot me with a firearm. The same self-defense would apply.
Because the scamdemic is still BS, the "vaccine" still isn't a vaccine, still doesn't work, and still causes FAR too many dangerous side effects compared to whatever alleged good it does. Even the ideal situation (priming your immune system for a variant that no longer exists) isn't desirable! You'd be better off with a "generic" "unmodified" immune system to face down the future variants. That much is certain, based on the SCIENCE.