Well, it kind of looks like those pushing the biomechanical-nanotech angle may be vindicated
No, not at all. First of all, several groups have claimed to put this stuff under a microscope and this is the first time this stuff has been found. Why didn't Madej and the other groups find this same substance in the jab?
Even if it turns out that there is some nano-tech in there, it doesn't vindicate those who were asserting that it was in there WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. It would be one thing to say, "be careful, there might be something unknown in there along those lines" but quite another to claim that we'll become mind-controlled 5G zombie robots without a shred of actual evidence. If this is real, which is doubtful, this would be the first such evidence presented.
But everyone needs to be careful that this too is real and not some disinfo. There could be many paid disinfo agents out there spreading this stuff with the intent of discrediting the anti-jab movement.
As Matthew said, this is totally unnecessary to make the case for rejecting the vaccination (even if the moral reasons did not suffice). Given that, one needs to avoid all the speculation, which can serve the purpose of discrediting all real and provable information regarding the harmfulness of the jab. I've seen Madej ripped to shreds in anti-vax debunking videos. If someone is one the fence about the jab and runs into one of these videos that makes her look like a fool, they'll be more inclined to dismiss ALL of the anti-jab materials as more of the same. I'm not sure how many times I have to post that before some people here on CI wake up to that problem.