CathInfo.com

How on earth could this ever become the subject of an argument? I will not argue with you, my dear.

I'll add this on because it's important to know. In the photo above, I was young, I don't remember what age. That was at the peak of my malnourishment. I maintained all of my genetic features, which is because most of my family were also malnourished, some intentionally in order to present a more "dollish look." Obviously it wasn't treated as such on the surface level. For me, I never knew better food so I didn't care for years. This lead to me having smaller facial features, darker hair and so on.

My hair is still dark, don't get me wrong, maybe even more rich on the top of my head, but the difference now is thanks to soluble fat my body is able to absorb vitamin D properly when before it had trouble. Again, see my family for reference, pale skin and brittle looking despite coming from a sun filled, virile climate. This was me, now, it's beginning to change.

 It will never be as good as I could possibly hope for, I'll never look like my ancestors from 300+ years ago, and obviously no one except for me will notice. Most people born since the great depression (most people alive in 2026) never got over their previous generations' malnourishment, it's a treacherous cycle and one I'm going to break. You never realize how much a simple diet change can affect your looks, and personality too. This is why I have a hard time blaming anybody, if I can tell you are/were malnourished I have sympathy for you.

I think the Rosary worn outside his shirt by our 17 year old selfie addict is EXTREMELY disedifying. I would counsel him to stop it, but he probably won't take the advice of an old bag. He knows better, you see .........

I think Miseremini would have done better to discredit him personally for doing something very particular and distasteful, than to attempt to discredit the rather very creditable practice of those drawn to it by the right reasons.