Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health  (Read 547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Maria Regina

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2364
  • Reputation: +571/-126
  • Gender: Female
20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
« on: January 08, 2019, 03:22:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • https://healthimpactnews.com/2019/20000-satellites-for-5g-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth/

    20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth







    by John P. Thomas
    Health Impact News

    Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.

    In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.

    As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.

    The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1]
    The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1]

    5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones
    These satellites will use the same type of phased array antennas as will be used by the ground-based 5G systems.

    This means that they will send tightly focused beams of intense microwave radiation at each specific 5G device that is on the Earth and each device will send a beam of radiation back to the satellite. [2]

    Previous generations of RF cellular communication used large antennas to send a blanket of radiation in all directions. The lower frequencies they used and the broad distribution of microwaves limited the numbers of cellular devices that could connect through an individual tall tower.

    The much shorter length microwaves used for 5G will make it possible to use small phased array antennas to send and receive signals.  

    Phased array antennas consist of clusters of hundreds of tiny antennas that work together to shoot a ray of energy at a target just like a bullet. A cluster of these tiny antennas can be arranged in a 4 inch by 4 inch matrix.

    The rays of microwaves they produce will be strong enough to pass through walls and human bodies. If they were not strong enough to do this, then everyone with a 5G smartphone would have to stand outside when using the devices. [2]

    Each 5G product will also have multiple phased array antennas which will be used to create a powerful beam of radiation back to the 5G devices mounted on electrical utility poles or toward a specific satellite in space.

    These beams of radiation will also need to be strong enough to pass through walls and human flesh such as a hand or head to reach the intended destination. [2]

    This means that if you are in a crowded location, such as an airport or on a train, there will be hundreds if not thousands of invisible beams of radiation flying through the environment at the speed of light.

    As people move in that environment, their bodies will be penetrated by numerous beams of radiation as they walk or as other people walk around them with their 5G smartphones. [2]

    5G Phones will be much more Powerful than Previous Phones
    The effective radiated power of the 5G phased array antennas in phones will be 10 times more powerful than 4G phones.
    No one will be free from exposure.

    In addition, 5G beams of microwave radiation will be received and transmitted from new computer equipment, household appliances, and automobiles.

    Stationary equipment such as Wi-Fi hubs in homes and offices will be permitted to use microwave beams that are 15 times stronger (300 watts) than the signals from 5G phones or 150 times stronger than 4G phones. [2]

    Why is 5G so Much More Dangerous than Previous Microwave Communication Systems?
    Arthur Firstenberg, author, researcher, and advocate for limiting RF exposure from the environment, explains the analysis of 5G radiation that was published in Microwave News in 2002. He stated:

    Quote
    When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow.

    But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body [5G], something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body.

    These re-radiated waves are called Brillouin precursors.

    They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough.

    5G will probably satisfy both requirements. This means that the reassurance we are being given—that these millimeter waves are too short to penetrate far into the body—is not true. [2]
    5G Satellites Will Fill the Skies
    These are the companies with the biggest plans to deploy satellites:
    • SpaceX: 12,000 satellites
    • OneWeb: 4,560 satellites
    • Boeing: 2,956 satellites
    • Spire Global: 972 satellites
    Arthur Firstenberg describes the plans of corporations who want to use 5G technology. He states:

    Quote
    Honeywell has already signed a memorandum of understanding to become OneWeb’s first large customer—it plans to provide high-speed Wi-Fi on business, commercial, and military aircraft throughout the world.
     

    SpaceX would like to provide the equivalent of 5G to every person on the planet. [3]
    Ground-based 5G Implementation
    Ground-based 5G systems are already being implemented in dozens of major cities right now. Plans are being approved by hundreds of other cities, which will allow implementation in 2019 and beyond.

    As I explained in my previous articles, cities do not have the right to “say no” to 5G. FCC regulations prevent cities from objecting on the basis of health concerns – they only can speak to issues of esthetics and the practical matter of the placement of equipment.

    They are required to “say yes,” and they better do it quickly, or telecom companies will threaten them with legal action for obstructing their plans.

    Satellite Based 5G Implementation
    The first two 5G test satellites were launched by SpaceX in February of 2018. Hundreds of other satellites are expected to be launched in 2019. The full set of 20,000 satellites could be put in orbit during the next two years.

    To put this into perspective, as of September 2017 there were 1,738 operating satellites into orbit around the Earth. This means the number of satellites will be 11 times greater than the current number. [4]

    Environmental Catastrophe from Rockets used to Launch Satellites
    Rocket fuel is very destructive to the Earth’s ozone layer which protects us from the harsh effects of radiation from the sun. In 2017, there were 90 rocket launch attempts worldwide. [5]

    The rockets that use solid fuel produce massive ozone depletion. While rockets using liquid kerosene as fuel destroy less ozone, they release massive amounts of black carbon soot into the air, especially at high altitudes.

    If the number of annual rocket launches increases by 10 or more times, which is likely under the plans these corporations have made, computer models suggest that the combination of ozone depletion and release of black soot could produce a 3 degree warming effect over the Antarctic and reduce the ozone in the world’s atmosphere by 4%. [3]

    Even though it will be possible for a single rocket to put multiple satellites into orbit, we are still talking about a 10 or 20 fold increase in environmental damage over what is being produced today. [3]

    The 5G satellites have a relatively short lifespan, perhaps only 5 years, which means there will be high numbers of rocket launches, not just in the next few years, but in every year for the foreseeable future. [3]

    Mercury-based Rocket Fuel Could Spread Neurotoxins Over the Earth
    As bad as liquid and solid rocket fuels will be for the environment, Apollo Fusion is developing a mercury-based propulsion system for launching rockets.  [Think: more autistic children.]

    These ion propulsion rocket engines use powerful magnets to push away small charged particles at high speeds, which generates thrust. NASA experimented with mercury ion propulsion in the 1960s, but abandoned the research.

    Mercury is an extremely strong neurotoxin, which is harmful to all forms of life, especially humans.

    The risks of an environmental catastrophe are monumental, because if there was a malfunction and one of these engines exploded, highly toxic mercury would be spread through the atmosphere and over the Earth. [6]

    All the talk from telecom companies about 5G being a panacea for environmental protection and energy conservation is quite ridiculous when we think about the environmental damage that will be created by any of the rocket engines they choose to use for launching their satellites.  

    Space Junk will Pollute the Earth
    Each satellite will be the size of a small refrigerator and will weigh approximately 880 pounds. [4]

    With a life expectancy of only 5-years [3], this means there will be a massive amount of space junk orbiting the Earth.
    Eventually, all those satellites will fall down to Earth and will burn up as they enter the Earth’s atmosphere.

    All the hazardous materials in the satellites will be released into the air and will float down to the ground as dust or in droplets of rain.

    Telecom Companies are Creating a Worldwide Disaster in the Name of Technological Progress
    5G is promoted as being the next great wonder in the plan to advance technology to create smart cities where everything and everyone is instantly connected in real time with no lags or lost signals.

    Of course there will be a few costs.

    Everyone will be irradiated with millimeter-size, non-ionizing radiation 24 hours a day with completely unknown health effects.

    Studies designed to investigate harm from 5G will be completed many years after the 5G systems on the ground and in space are fully implemented.

    At that point it is very unlikely that telecom companies would dismantle their systems even if it is shown that their technology is causing cancer and other diseases. They would just deny the risks.

    They will tell us that the science was settled decades ago. They will tell us that evidence linking 5G to cancer and other diseases is just a conspiracy theory that only a few crackpots believe.

    Millions of people will suffer from radiation exposure with symptoms such as headaches, weakness, brain fog, impaired ability to learn and reason, chest pain, and numerous other symptoms that will baffle most conventional physicians.

    There is Nowhere to Hide from 5G Radiation
    Today, it is possible to live in a location that has reduced levels of microwave exposure. This is accomplished by choosing a living space that is far away from cell phone towers.

    However, in the near future, it won’t matter where we live, because 5G will irradiate us wherever we happen to live or work.

    Cities Can’t Say No to 5G Implementation
    FCC regulations have been structured in such a way that local municipalities cannot stop telecom companies from installing 5G. They are specifically prohibited from trying to delay or stop 5G implementation on the basis of health concerns. Their only recourse is to try to make the ground-based 5G system somewhat more esthetically pleasant.

    Based on what has been happening around the country, telecom companies are sweeping aside local resistance and gaining approval for their 5G systems in rapid succession.

    Can 5G Implementation be Stopped?
    As far as I can tell, at this point, the only way that 5G will be stopped will be by congressional action. If enough people raise a stink with their elected officials, then perhaps 5G could be put on hold while studies are done to examine the true health risks.

    Telecom investment in 5G has been massive. They are planning full implementation on the ground and in space in the next couple years. The time to object is now and not after hundreds of thousands of people become sick. [7]


    Notes: Blue font is my emphasis.
    With 5G implementation and the use of Mercury as fuel, we will see increased incidents of autism in children.
    In addition, several scientists have suggested that targeted assassinations can be accomplished if several satellites were directed to aim their beam at you.
    Lord have mercy.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22010
    • Reputation: +19305/-113
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #1 on: January 08, 2019, 11:40:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I believe cellular/wifi/RF radiation is more harmful than "commonly believed".
    I believe cell phone radiation can cause brain cancer in children and heavy adult users -- especially the young (whose skulls are thinner).
    I believe that Science's awareness of the danger of RF radiation mirrors Science's knowledge of the dangers of smoking in 1950, or narcotics in 1910. Google all the crazy stuff that happened in the 1950's (for example, ads promoting smoking by pregnant women) If you read your recent history, you can see just how drop-dead stupid science can be.

    Long story short, science has been WRONG and proven QUITE FALLIBLE (not to say woefully ignorant) in the past; why should I treat Science as infallible now?

    That having been said...

    With (X) 5G satellites blasting 5G at the whole earth, how many satellites is that per square meter of surface? How could such satellites push much of a RF signal when they are limited by their power source? A satellite only has a few solar panels to generate electricity. I seriously doubt each satellite has a mini nuclear power plant on board...

    It's a question of power or wattage. It doesn't matter what frequency or what the RF signal is used for. Looking only at the strength of the signal (which is what does the damage, right?), a satellite can only push out so many watts of RF signal per minute.

    And the earth is a very, very big place.

    Furthermore, I detect a high degree of fear-mongering, alarmism, and "over simplification" in the article. For example, they say "no place is safe" so everyone has to sign the petition, buy their products, buy their book, etc. You get the idea.

    But I don't believe it. There's no way they're going to spend as much power broadcasting 5G signals to the wilderness of Alaska or the cattle grazing fields of West Texas as they spend broadcasting 5G to the major cities of America. Why would they do that? Black bears and longhorn cattle don't need 5G Internet, nor do they have cell phones.

    Even if these 20,000 satellites were only to cover America -- America is also a very big place. Especially when the gun is shooting from low-earth orbit. Ever heard of progressing at a geometric rate? When something is expanding in 3D space, it dissipates very quickly. The decay is exponential as the covered area goes up exponentially from the source. Think of the area contained by a 1 meter cube, vs. a 3 meter cube, then a 10 meter cube, 100 meter cube, etc. The progression is exponential or logarithmic, not linear.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22010
    • Reputation: +19305/-113
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #2 on: January 08, 2019, 12:00:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    The effective radiated power of the 5G phased array antennas in phones will be 10 times more powerful than 4G phones.
    No one will be free from exposure.

    In addition, 5G beams of microwave radiation will be received and transmitted from new computer equipment, household appliances, and automobiles.

    Stationary equipment such as Wi-Fi hubs in homes and offices will be permitted to use microwave beams that are 15 times stronger (300 watts) than the signals from 5G phones or 150 times stronger than 4G phones. [2]

    10 times more powerful? So, basically phone batteries will only last 1/10th as long as they do now? So instead of lasting for a 12 hour day before needing a recharge, they will need recharging 10 times per day? I don't think people will go for that. Battery technology isn't magic; there's no silver bullet to keep phones small & light and increase battery capacity by 10X. It's not as easy as shrinking transistors and increasing the speed of CPUs. You would need a complete revolution in battery technology and charging technology/infrastructure to accommodate phones that are 10X as power hungry.

    Again, "no one will be free from exposure" -- that might be technically true, but to be more accurate they would admit that many living in rural areas will receive 1 millionth what a citizen of New York will receive. So while technically they're not lying, they ARE fear-mongering and exaggerating.

    household appliances? Oh no! The sky is falling! Oh, wait a minute -- they're talking about those $2,500 WIFI-enabled refrigerators that some rich people have. Guess what? My fridge cost $350 new when I bought it in 2004. It has no electronics whatsoever. Just a good old fashioned fridge with a compressor to keep the thing cold and a light bulb inside. When it dies (probably soon), it will be replaced with a similar model.

    Same with automobiles. Our 2001 PT Cruiser and 2004 Yukon are quite behind the technology curve.

    300 watts for a router? Not here! Do you know how much electricity that is? That's half as much as some small microwaves consume. There's no way I'm going to burn the equivalent of (3) 100W light bulbs just to broadcast wifi to my house. Right now I think our WIFI router takes about 15W total for the whole thing, wifi and all.

    I have an outdoor light fixture with (2) 500W light bulbs. Only one of them works. Just put your hand in front of one of those 500W light bulbs -- it feels quite warm even 1 second after plugging it in. You can feel the intense heat it generates.



    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2823
    • Reputation: +76/-86
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #3 on: January 08, 2019, 12:27:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • With all the abortion, sodomy, casual hook-up fornication, making money into a god, porn, blasphemy, apostasy and divorce God is going to chastise the world with microwave radiation and increased cancer rates?

    Looking at the world right now this would be one of the last of my worries.  Even if it is real, it will take so long to have any noticeable effect that we may be through the Chastisement and well into the period of peace before anyone notices.  If I make it through that, who cares if I die of cancer?  If I don't then I won't die of cancer.

    There are HUGE problems raising a family today.  5G radiation is like my 187th thing to worry about, somewhere between bird-flu and the plastic in the Pacific ocean.   Currently I am focusing on the top 5.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22010
    • Reputation: +19305/-113
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #4 on: January 08, 2019, 12:42:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • See my other 2 posts (above), but even in a worst-case scenario (every square foot of earth to be blanketed by 5G radiation which is harmful to health, causes cancer, and nothing you can do about it) I would say: Who cares? I only concern myself with things I can control or do something about.

    If you tell me that machinations are underway for WW3, I can begin working on preps and a fallout shelter. If economic collapse is imminent, I can pull my digi-dollars out of the bank and buy physical items (food, shovels, seeds). If there are action items by which one can prepare or improve one's position, then great! 

    But it's folly to worry, concern oneself, or lose your tranquility over things completely outside of one's sphere of control.

    You know that famous saying -- "God grant me the courage to change the things I can control, the serenity to accept the things I can't control ... and the wisdom to know the difference." that's a very wise quote there!
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18147
    • Reputation: +8236/-630
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #5 on: January 11, 2019, 05:31:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    Even if these 20,000 satellites were only to cover America -- America is also a very big place. Especially when the gun is shooting from low-earth orbit. Ever heard of progressing at a geometric rate? When something is expanding in 3D space, it dissipates very quickly. The decay is exponential as the covered area goes up exponentially from the source. Think of the area contained by a 1 meter cube, vs. a 3 meter cube, then a 10 meter cube, 100 meter cube, etc. The progression is exponential or logarithmic, not linear.
    .
    Low earth orbit (LEO) satellites do not remain in one position in the sky because their positional stability degrades too fast and they wouldn't be able to stay up. You can look up the altitude history of any erstwhile orbiting satellite that eventually came crashing down to earth uncontrollably. Usually what happens is they use up all their fuel by small bursts of rocket engines whose exhaust is pointed at the earth, because their purpose is to increase the satellite's altitude.
    .
    For any satellite to be geostationary it has to maintain an altitude many times further from earth than LEO. So for "these 20,000 satellites to only cover America" they would have to remain positioned only over America, which is impossible. Any satellite that would "only cover America" would have to be in LEO AND BE GEOSTATIONARY, and that can't happen. Period.
    .
    Any geostationary satellite that remains over America also remains over Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America and either Greenland or the South Pacific. Perhaps parts of northeast Russia.

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5638
    • Reputation: +2043/-43
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #6 on: January 17, 2019, 08:41:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SPECIAL: Dr. Sharon Goldberg gives testimony before the Michigan House Committee on How the 5G Network will Mutate You or Kill You.....

    Video about 15 minutes

    https://phibetaiota.net/2019/01/special-5g-will-mutate-you-or-kill-you/ 

    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2823
    • Reputation: +76/-86
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #7 on: January 17, 2019, 09:20:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Goldberg !!!

    She must be a good Jew fighting the bad Jews who are trying to nuke everyone with 5G ;D


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22010
    • Reputation: +19305/-113
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #8 on: January 17, 2019, 11:47:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I updated my post above. This particular point really seems to border on BS, rather than just fear-mongering:


    Quote
    "The effective radiated power of the 5G phased array antennas in phones will be 10 times more powerful than 4G phones.
    No one will be free from exposure."


    10 times more powerful? So, basically phone batteries will only last 1/10th as long as they do now? So instead of lasting for a 12 hour day before needing a recharge, they will need recharging 10 times per day? I don't think people will go for that. Battery technology isn't magic; there's no silver bullet to keep phones small & light and increase battery capacity by 10X. It's not as easy as shrinking transistors and increasing the speed of CPUs. You would need a complete revolution in battery technology and charging technology/infrastructure to accommodate phones that are 10X as power hungry.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline forlorn

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 662
    • Reputation: +272/-335
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #9 on: January 17, 2019, 01:22:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I updated my post above. This particular point really seems to border on BS, rather than just fear-mongering:



    10 times more powerful? So, basically phone batteries will only last 1/10th as long as they do now? So instead of lasting for a 12 hour day before needing a recharge, they will need recharging 10 times per day? I don't think people will go for that. Battery technology isn't magic; there's no silver bullet to keep phones small & light and increase battery capacity by 10X. It's not as easy as shrinking transistors and increasing the speed of CPUs. You would need a complete revolution in battery technology and charging technology/infrastructure to accommodate phones that are 10X as power hungry.
    Well no, that would only apply if these antennas were the only things draining phone battery. That's not the case however. Battery lives would shorten, and possibly to an unacceptable degree, but not by anywhere near that much. 

    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2823
    • Reputation: +76/-86
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #10 on: January 17, 2019, 02:03:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Matthew

    The conservation of energy principle is a Jewish conspiracy designed to keep everyone poor.

    Amalie Emmy Noether was from a rich Jewish family living in Germany between world war I and II.  Kicked out by the Nazis.

    Big oil (Jew controlled) has suppressed all the over unity technology that would give the world abundant cheap energy. ;)



    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22010
    • Reputation: +19305/-113
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #11 on: January 17, 2019, 02:04:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well no, that would only apply if these antennas were the only things draining phone battery. That's not the case however. Battery lives would shorten, and possibly to an unacceptable degree, but not by anywhere near that much.

    The antennas are the main thing draining phone battery, unless you're running CPU intensive (i.e., running ALL cores on your CPU at 100%) apps on your phone like cryptocurrency mining. Heavy CPU use is the only thing that competes with the cell/wifi radio functionality. Besides crypto mining, I can't think of any other app that uses that much CPU power.

    Remember the old days when they used to quote phone battery life in "active/talking" and "standby" (turned on, but not talking) time?  I'm old enough to remember that, plus I understand why.

    I am a software developer with quite a bit of computer hardware knowledge as well -- which extends to smartphones.

    If transmit power went up by 10X, the overall power consumption of the phone would go up by a large, noticeable degree.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22010
    • Reputation: +19305/-113
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #12 on: January 17, 2019, 02:11:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I thought I'd find some hard data for you. Here you go:

    https://petewarden.com/2015/10/08/smartphone-energy-consumption/


    Quote
    I found a lot of very useful estimates for components power usages scattered through the book. These are just rough guides, but they helped my mental modeling, so here are some I found notable:


    • An ARM A9 CPU can use between 500 and 2,000 mW.
    • A display might use 400 mW.
    • Active cell radio might use 800 mW.
    • Bluetooth might use 100 mW.
    • Accelerometer is 21 mW.
    • Gyroscope is 130 mW.
    • Microphone is 101 mW.
    • GPS is 176 mW.
    • Using the camera in ‘viewfinder’ mode, focusing and looking at a picture preview, might use 1,000 mW.
    • Actually recording video might take another 200 to 1,000 mW on top of that.

    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline forlorn

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 662
    • Reputation: +272/-335
    • Gender: Male
    Re: 20,000 5G Satellites - dangerous to health
    « Reply #13 on: January 17, 2019, 02:20:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I thought I'd find some hard data for you. Here you go:

    https://petewarden.com/2015/10/08/smartphone-energy-consumption/
    Good find, thanks. How is that affected if you turn off your data though? I know even now phone batteries can fall far short of the 12 hour mark if you have your data on and you're actively using it all day, but if you turned it off would the extra battery requirements of 5G be mitigated? Or not? 

    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2823
    • Reputation: +76/-86
    • Gender: Male

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16