It's even more evil in practice than it is in theory.
The VII "Magisterium" is heretical, but not THAT heretical, it's more subtle. However, in practice, meaning if you visit various Novus Ordo chapels, you will see blatantly heretical attitudes from the laity and "clergy," as well as outright hostility or discomfort towards a true Catholic disposition that is worse than you will find among Protestants.
The divorce rate is another example of this. There is no official word from the Pope encouraging divorce. There is no encyclical praising divorce and remarriage. Yet the divorce rate in the Church skyrocketed exponentially.
Here is something to think about: Sometimes, SILENCE IS ALSO A SIN. Some non-sedes seem to have forgotten this, locked as they are in their Pharisaical view that the Pope is only infallible when he speaks ex cathedra, and that at all other times he is essentially useless. The fact that JPII or Benedict never said anything about the divorce rate hardly exonerates them; on the contrary, IT CONDEMNS THEM, along with so much else. As far as I know, there is not one lament from a VII anti-Pope about how many divorces are happening these days, and more importantly, no instructions have been given to bishops to stop the divorces from happening or to make the rules of divorce traditionally strict, what you might call CATHOLIC. How can people kid themselves? This could not happen without the consent of the CEO, the man at the top. I won't call him the Pope, because he isn't one, but he is the decision-maker of whatever this monstrosity known as Vatican II is.
These guys are like spiders, sitting there in silence in the center of it all, but nevertheless, they are the ones presiding over this web. Their consent, when it isn't active, is passive. What are we supposed to believe, that they don't have the Internet, that they don't see the abuses we all see, that they can't do anything about it? Maybe Ratzinger is too much of a Tattergreis ( wobbly old man ) and he doesn't know how to work a mouse? It doesn't work like that. You don't get to just be silent and do nothing when Rome is burning. Silence is consent. The whole criticism of Honorius was that he allegedly was silent when a heresy was being spread, not that he himself said anything heretical. These guys do BOTH -- what Honorius only allegedly did once, they provably do on a daily basis -- and people make excuses for them after fifty years of this, all tangled up in superstitious legalisms ( yes, it seems like a paradox, but it exists ).
Topic: Yet More Victims of Feminism (Read 703 times)