Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS  (Read 1302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jack in the Box

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 191
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
« on: November 24, 2012, 04:09:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The "wrong" Sign of the Cross in about to be enforced upon the one billion and one hundred millions Roman Catholic. Our Pope Benedict XVI has apparently already adopted the Sign of the Cross of the Byzantine Church, and might impose it as soon as this coming Advent, which will mark the beginning of the liturgical year, in just a few days. This heretic Sign of the Cross will be one more step towards the Great Apostasy, announced in 1846 by Our Lady of La Salette.
    Time is pressing! This seems to be the reason that I have to make this urgent posting. I am not able to fully understand the whole doctrine, but I am probably designated to write those lines on this forum for my sole resiliency.
     
    God the Almighty is incomprehensible, and knows that. In order to be worshiped in a proper way, He explained it to His creatures by a sequential series of coming-down to earth.
    After God confronted Adam in the Garden of Eden, God came three times among His creatures. God therefore came in following a time-line.
    First time: God met with Abraham. This is when He promised a son to Sara. Then 28 generations later (please correct me if I am wrong), after being prophesied for 14 generations since David, the Christ followed the Father.
    Second time: Jesus Christ, God came and announced the future coming of the Paraclete. The Paraclete, thus is proceeding from the Father and the Son.
    Third time: The Holy Ghost (the Paraclete) descended in the form of tongues of flames upon His creatures on Pentecost upon the Jєωs, with the Virgin Mary in the middle, then later upon the Gentiles who were represented by Cornelius and companions, with St. Peter in the middle.
    This historical order of 1, 2 and 3 is a way to the incomprehensible God to be understood to His creatures for worship.
    The "right" Sign of the Cross done by the Roman Catholic, is to-day the right way to worship God.
     
    The error of the Eastern Church starts from a misinterpretation of the baptism of Jesus Christ. The Holy Ghost did not descend from above the Jordan River, but simply appeared as a dove as a sign of godly manifestation. The "dove" is simply a sign of manifestation, while the "tongues of flame" are a descent of God upon man.
    This misinterpretation from the Eastern Church, as well as from the many Baptist-sect renders Jesus Christ less that the Holy Ghost, since, according to this heresy, Jesus obtained His deity on the day of His baptism, as opposed to being God from the moment of His conception. This reverses the order of worship, and lessen Jesus Christ, in favor of the Paraclete. The Sign of the Cross of the Eastern Church, that is about to be enforced upon the Roman Catholic is precisely this heresy. Since it will be performed by the multitudes, it will offend God; it will lessen Jesus Christ in our worship; it will degrade the Blessed Virgin Mary by rendering her to be no more than "the mother of Jesus", whose "Jesus" then becomes no more than a man who became the God-man on the Jordan River on the day of His baptism.
    The wrong Sign of the Cross will be a disaster to the Roman Catholic Church, because since it will show less respect to Jesus Christ Our Lord, it will pave the way to the impostor of Christ who is the Antichrist.
     
    The main reason (it appears) for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, is to counter the heresy of one of the main Eastern Church, which is the Russian Orthodox Church.
    The "wrong" Sign of the Cross, if adopted by Rome, will be a disaster.
     
    I hope that those confused lines are understood, and will be taken, as a relay, by more able writing hands than this stupid person of mine who truly takes dictations. Amen.
     
    Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us!
    Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!
    Saint Athanasius, pray for us!
    Saint Francis de Sales, pray for us!
     


    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4670
    • Reputation: +1765/-353
    • Gender: Female
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #1 on: November 24, 2012, 09:02:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The disaster is the continual sacrifice of the Precious Blood coming to an end.  Chapter 12 of Daniel.  Three and a half years without the Precious Blood on this earth!  Tribulation!


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #2 on: November 24, 2012, 11:53:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Jack, if you're not a troll, you're doing a great job of faking it.


    Why do you persistently avoid posting in threads you started?  You make a
    new thread instead of posting in the same topic you yourself already started --
    with the same title, even?  How many threads on the "WRONG SIGN OF THE
    CROSS" do you have in mind?  Seven?  Forty-three?

    Sheesh ..........  :facepalm:


    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Jack in the Box

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 191
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #3 on: November 26, 2012, 01:43:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Reply to Neil Obstad: Greeetings: I do not undertand the term "threads", which seems to be a classroom-term to me. I am totally uneducated, (I learned writing in reading English-language magazines, some poetries and by going to the symphony) so I think that you are refering to me being "meandering". If this is what I think you are criticizing, that I "drift" from one subject to the other. I'll give an answer, because I am conscient of this.
    I have so much to say, that it is like attempting to serve a glass of fresh-drinking water out of a gushing fire-hydren. This resounds as being self-important, but there is a lot happening.
    I believe that the situation within the Church is changing rapidly, and that we are entering in unknown territory, a crisis of such magnitude that no one is prepared.

    I also think that I am right: I have recently being persecuted.

    Offline Jack in the Box

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 191
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #4 on: November 26, 2012, 06:12:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Reply to Songbird:
    Greetings: Alas you are right about the Tribulations! We might be in them within weeks!

    About the true Mass: Yes your are right. The loss of the Mass is the most devastating in this battle against evil. The loss of the correct Sign of the Cross might come second after the loss of the Mass, because it is the most simple form of prayer that may be done by all.
    A child may do the Sign of the Cross several times a day without knowing any other prayers, and may show love for God, or may ask for help when in danger. Its power against the demons is why the priest performs a minimum of 52 Signs of the Cross during Low-Mass.
    It is apparent that since Pope Benedict has publicly done the Sign of the Cross of the Byzantine Church that he will impose it by fiat. (the Byzantine Sign of the Cross is wrong towards the order of the Holy Trinity, an when done with knowledge, it is a breaking of the First Commandement). This means that the Tridentine Mass will be messed-up.
    There lays the danger for the Church. The "wrong" Sign of the Cross may be adopted by the traditionalists for three reasons during the incoming Tribulation:

     First: There are several priests in the SSPX who have shown to have L'esprit collabo. This was shown recently when Bishop Fellay nearly made a deal with the Vatican.

     Second: Many faithful do not understand fully that the Tridentine Mass is a sacrifice at the altar. They go to the traditional masses out of nostalgia. Once the "wrong" Sign of the Cross will have been adopted, then the enemies of Christ in the Vatican will promote full-tilt the Tridentine Mass, because it will have been rendered invalid for the single reason of the "wrong" Sign of the Cross.

     Third: The Pope will invoque "tradition" as a reason for enforcing the "wrong" Sign of the Cross. It is factual that the early Church did the Byzantine Sign of the Cross, but it is also factual that Jesus Christ Our Lord gave us very little instructions about the rites. The correct rites came to perfection by the time of the Council of Trent. An objection to the "wrong" Sign of the Cross, that will soon be adopted, lies in its significance towards the Holy Trinity, and in its direct result: the demons fear the Roman Catholic Sign of the Cross (all exorcists will agree). An other objection is that it will temper with the Tridentine Mass, and finally, the standard objection being that nothing has come good since V2.


    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #5 on: November 27, 2012, 02:34:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0




  • Barack Obama Gives the Ceremonial Thanksgiving Turkey a Demonic "Blessing"
    Obama "Blessed" the Turkey with Left-handed Sign of the Cross
    Which Is the Practice of Warlocks to Mock Anything Sacred to Christianity
    Obama Has Racked up Quite a History of Anti-Catholicism
    In His Four Years in the White House
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Jack in the Box

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 191
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #6 on: November 28, 2012, 01:44:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Greeting "Incredulous": Thank you for your observation of the left-hand Sign of the Cross done by President Obama.
    A Sign of the Cross, if not done improperly, may be nefarious. If the "wrong" Sign of the Cross of the Byzantine Church is adopted by Rome, it will be a disaster. It is likely that our Pope Benedict will force the "wrong" Sign of the Cross by fiat. This attempt must be derailed! It must come from grass-root, and climb towards the conference of bishops.
     
    Our Pope Benedict is either "bad" or is a hostage. It is possible that when he publicly performed the Sign of the Cross of the Eastern Church, it was to warn the population. Our Pope is likely under duress. Our Blessed Mother said that she will be by his side to the last.

    In all case the Sign of the Cross presently done by the Roman Catholics must be preserved.

    Offline Jack in the Box

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 191
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    WRONG SIGN OF THE CROSS
    « Reply #7 on: November 28, 2012, 04:52:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • AN IMPORTANT INPUT TO THIS TOPIC:
    I was just told that the Immaculate Conception, in Lourdes, prayed with Sainte Bernadette, and naturally the Blessed Virgin Mary had to have done the Sign of the Cross. There alledgedly was nothing unusual reported by Bernadette Soubiroux.

    I wish to know if someone on this forum may assert and confirm to what I was just being told: that the Blessed Virgin Mary prayed with the seer. If this occured, this means that the Blessed Virgin Mary did the Sign of the Cross that is currently done by the Roman Catholics.