But, if something should happen which interjects confusion into that development (eg., sɛҳuąƖ abuse, in which a boy begins to question his own sɛҳuąƖity because he felt pleasure amidst the abuse, and then incurs anxiety because of the fact, and draws the erroneous conclusion that he must be ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ against his own wishes, then after years of struggle and conflict, and building on that first mistaken conclusion, makes another erroneous judgment on top of it that, if this is the way he is, he must accept himself so as to have some degree of peace with self.  Naturally, at this point, mistaken “self-acceptance” easily transitions to self-approval, which transitions to acceptance of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity as “normal,” and not immoral, since after all, he did not choose to become this way: He just always was!).

Indeed I read an article one and, although I can't remember the exact figure, some ridiculously high proportion of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs were abused as children. So clearly there is a strong correlation between the two. 

The idea of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity as a "sɛҳuąƖ orientation" rather than a disease or perversion is also further disproven by the fact that, despite only maybe 1% of people being ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, 30% of paedophiles are. That's a 30x over-representation. The conclusion is clear, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is just another disease and abominable perversion that can develop in tandem with other perversions.

As for how pornography might cause it, every personal account and study I've read on it shows that it has a desensitising effect whereby the individual becomes bored of the more "vanilla" content they're watching, and move on to "fetish" content. A teenage boy might first look up pictures of naked women, then move on to watching ordinary sex scenes, but grow bored with that too, and might eventually find himself watching all kinds of perverted content.  So it's clear that pornography develops perversions, and as ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a perversion, it's clear to see how one could cause the other.

Pornography has definitely played a part into the confusion with sexes, and violence toward each gender

I have been considering the explosion in the rise of the sodomite population, and noticed how it coincided with the advent of the internet in the mid-1990’s, and wondered whether there could be a correlation.

Not that I disagree with what you write further down Sean, but the explosion in the sodomite population is entirely connected to the rise of diversity. European white Millennial males are less likely to have committed the sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance than both white Boomers and Gen-Xers (X-ers less so than Boomers). Blacks (think Africa and AIDS here), Hispanics, and East Asians have much higher rates of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity than whites or Europeans.  

On the other hand, since the mid-90's there has been an explosion in lesbianism across all races and ethnicities. Something like 15% of women in their 20's admit to having had gone lesbo. When it comes to heterosɛҳuąƖity's decline, its the women, not so much the men.

A big topic that most of us here would agree on. It's good to be reminded of how porn and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity are linked.

Men are probably less prone to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity only due to the strength of the natural drive. However, pornography does add jet fuel to the fire, so any fallen inclination or demonic temptations will be increased exponentially. Equally concerning to me is the massive increase of pedophilia (on both sides) and I can't help but think it is largely the result of constant exposure to internet porn and unrestrained diabolic suggestion that go along with it. Women have a more muted drive, and I believe most of the time the subliminal rationale behind their degeneracy is born out of a desire to avoid the physical intimidation a man represents while using deviant means to retain control. Complete control is the name of the game for both sexes and women would do nearly anything to secure a portion of it for themselves without having to be confrontational, at least when they are first entering into relationships. This shouldn't be too much of a surprise considering that the modern sɛҳuąƖ foundation is established first through self-abuse. I would think most sɛҳuąƖ relationships today outside of marriage are probably closer to an assisted form of self-abuse anyway.

One feminine extreme would be to seek out the most outrageous and aggressive behavior in a mate. This is also aided by pornography, obviously. If she doesn't know what she wants, it's better to be wanted. If she can't convince herself that she's living a decent life, get a man or woman who are addicted to impurity that they'll do anything to keep her the center of attention (at least when they know she's looking). Any kind of attention seems to be just another false reassurance of being needed. The other extreme consists of seeking out weak men. Since raw physical power does not express itself in women as it does in men, they have a natural interest in blunting any real potential threat before they settle in. That way a woman can also lay claim to the higher decision making skills and thus garner more material security. Maybe it's like nesting behavior, only ensuring that there is a kill switch for their mate as well. Welcome to the female obsession (gαy or straight) with feminizing men! This is probably why even ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs require a dominant and a submissive in their pairings. It's not that they truly compliment each other, but that they assist each other in digging the grave of their own narcissistic rebellion.

Mostly I think that male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity comes from some kind of traumatic sɛҳuąƖ experience early in life, as men are the primary targets of all physical abuse, including sɛҳuąƖ. That being said, I'm sure the more gradual process of being exposed to porn and liberalism in general can help make it happen like it does for females. ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is so thoroughly incentivized for those wishing to carve out a permanent protected social space for themselves, that many seemingly normal people (men and women) who you'd never think would've had this problem contract it. The really scary thing is when degeneracy gets to the point of targeting children, and it seems to come from men online a lot more than the women, but then we have the majority of teacher abuse scandals coming from women. Either way, it is demonically inspired. Even some of the most basic natural graces are being withdrawn from the world as belief in the True Christ and the True Catholic Church breaks down.

Will Pornography Make you Queer?

No, it won't if what a man calls pornography involves only women. If a man however watches and seeks to watch pornography involving a man and a woman, then he was already a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, it did not make him one.

If Dad is into porno, he invites the demons into the home. Don’t be surprised if some of them promote the unnatural vice.  

After reading the posts, what is the solution?  A priest I know, thought one solution was a protestant program for the price of $162. of DVDs to help cure those of Porn. My soul hurt, with this solution, which it is not IMO.