The present concept of racism is a byproduct of schizophrenic modernism which has sought to replace true morality, which is perfectly expressed in the Catholic faith alone, with the imagined concepts of social evils. The modern man is a libertine that, despite his conscious and committed efforts to be free of all reasonable moral restraint, suffers very real pains in that withered and pitiful organ of conscience which he possesses despite his brutish inclinations. He must explain and justify these pains, so he has invented a set of ambiguous, vacillating caricatures of real evil which he cannot hope, and honestly does not truly seek, to live up to. I do not use the word "schizophrenic" inappropriately, for very often those poor souls that truly suffer that miscarriage of mind and reason do harm to body because they feel that their nightmarish conception of themselves merit it.
Racial prejudice is natural, healthy and warranted, despite the bleatings of liberals and modernists. Like any other prejudice, it involves very simply the momentary calculation of probabilities that a particular individual, because of race, age or some other immediately assessible factor, will act in a particular manner in response to a given stimulus. Let us assume for a moment that we have a geographic area, a town or city, which is populated chiefly by one racial majority and a second racial minority, and that the minority is expressed generally by a lack of education, wealth and employment level. We know from the Tenth Commandment that those with less, lacking sufficient grace, will covet those with more, and from that will spring a desire to them harm, by taking life, good health, property, or any combination of the three. Would any sane and rational man permit his son or daughter to walk through such areas unprotected? To seek a mate among them without pause or comment? Liberals would have us believe that the flush are at fault for the actions of thin, that the rich, simply by virtue of being rich, owe the poor what they do not and will not earn for themselves. To such notions, and though I disagree with the moral expressions of her Objectivist philosophy, I believe Ayn Rand said it very well when she posited that the man that is ashamed of his wealth is one that didn't come by it honestly.
Make no mistake that racial hatred truly does exist. I've seen it in every country that I've ever been in. In America, in Britian, in France, in Russia, in India, in Israel. In a dozen tongues, in every color of skin which God, is His love and wisdom, sought to make diverse. It has been my experience that such men do not simply stop at race. Their acceptance of hate allows it to grow and fester in their soul, and they come to hate all men for something.
I do not have many friends, nor do I want them, but my reluctance to associate with others is based on action, something which is absolutely voluntary. Even for those whom I personally despise, I pray that God will bless them and bring them to knowledge of the truth, which alone is found in the teaching of the Church. That is how a Catholic should determine any culpability in hatred, racial or otherwise. If you avoid their company because of race, because of culture, because of language, because of behavior, but you nonetheless pray for the intention of the sanctification of their souls, I truly believe that a Catholic may rest knowing that they are not guilty of hatred.