Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Who are the Children?  (Read 1638 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caminus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3013
  • Reputation: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Who are the Children?
« on: June 04, 2010, 12:35:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bitter old ladies, Feeneyite heretics and dogmatic sedevacantists who put you on ignore to cover their ears (or in this case, their eyes) because they don't like their opinions and attitudes examined under the light of truth.

     :laugh1:

       


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #1 on: June 04, 2010, 05:16:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Funny how not a few defenders of EENS (aka "Feeneyites"--even though I for instance have significant theological differences with them) would refer to you as the heretic.

    I have repeatedly stated that I do not consider BoD/BoB proponents to be heretics (one of my many open disagreements with the Dimonds, yet you try to lump me in with them).

    So, let's have it Caminus, do you consider me a heretic?  Stop mincing words.  When Matthew went on a purge of radical sedevacantists, he didn't address the issue of radical SSPXers such as yourself who would denounce sedevacantists and "Feeneyites" as heretics.

    PS -- maybe you get the ignores because people don't like your attitude.  Matthew, for instances, shares many if not most of your opinions, but he has a markedly different attitude.  You have a way of pushing people's buttons (though you convince yourself it's just because you're brilliant) by making ad hominem attacks, having even referred to them as "delicious".  And when you make arguments you have this tendency to throw in sweeping dismissals without any substantive argument (though every once in a whild you do make one).  You won't ever admit that you're wrong even when it's obvious, and you'll never admit when you're in a state of contradiction.  And, the thing that annoys me most, is that you like to redefine words to make them mean whatever you want them to, even if what you want them to mean actually happens to be the exact opposite of their obvious sense.

    So instead of blaming everyone else for your ignores, you may want to look in the mirror.

    When I get any, it's usually because I deserved them in having crossed a line and having lost my temper.  You (and one other), for instance, cause me temptations to lack of charity.  So perhaps that's why people put you on ignore.  I don't use ingnore, but it may be in my best interests to do so.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #2 on: June 04, 2010, 06:26:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Caminus,

    What was the christian purpose of the above post? I seem to have missed out on something.

    Andy

    Offline Caminus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3013
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #3 on: June 04, 2010, 08:59:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just a small rebuke to the childishness of grown adults and false scandal takers.  

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8018
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #4 on: June 04, 2010, 09:04:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, as for the saying about it NOT being what you say, but how you say it...it is BOTH.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #5 on: June 04, 2010, 09:19:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: sedetrad
    Caminus,

    What was the christian purpose of the above post? I seem to have missed out on something.

    Andy


    I missed it too, or despite me being considered a meany at times, thought it served no purpose.....
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #6 on: June 04, 2010, 09:20:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Caminus
    Just a small rebuke to the childishness of grown adults and false scandal takers.  


    actualy, not a rebuke as much as a statement that was not moored well, more a shot in the dark......could you perhaps develop this more.
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #7 on: June 04, 2010, 09:21:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gladius_veritatis
    Well, as for the saying about it NOT being what you say, but how you say it...it is BOTH.


    glad I am not alone in my confusion....
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #8 on: June 04, 2010, 01:15:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Caminus
    Just a small rebuke to the childishness of grown adults and false scandal takers.  



    That's a very judgmental thing to say. I mentioned you are wound up like a pretzel to make an argument like you have, and I wasn't being mean.

    YOU confuse me. When you claim people are "false" scandal takers, I'm sorry, it's not false, because I'm sure some people, like me, in order to understand your arguments (and granted they might be clear as crystal to you), have to spin their brains 360 degrees to actually comprehend what you're saying.

    So in order to not have to do that, I just don't read it anymore.

    All I'm going to say, is that you are being very judgmental by saying people are "false" scandal takers. You are judging an interior act of the conscience, and I wouldn't ever do that to anyone, however disingenuous I suspect people may be.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #9 on: June 04, 2010, 01:17:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • By the way, Caminus, I really don't consider myself old.

    33.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Who are the Children?
    « Reply #10 on: June 04, 2010, 02:38:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • um, no, I wish I was 33 again (am 39)
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic