Author Topic: white student group formed, are racist (Read 1779 times)

Iuvenalis · « **on:** March 28, 2013, 04:30:46 AM »

A white student union is formed, and are by default, racist.

Nevermind the black student union, asian student union, and every other ethnic group, the white group are racist.

But most interestingly, they start a neighborhood watch type of effort, and again, are 'racist' but there is a complete absence of arguing the *facts* cited by the organization's president:

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Towson-U-Student-Patrol-Sparks-Racism-Charges-200074831.html

And

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2013/03/26/white-student-union-claims-towson-has-black-on-white-crime-problem/

Sigismund · « **Reply #1 on:** March 28, 2013, 08:37:00 AM »

Whether or not it should be, I think the problem people have is that they assume that any such group is actually a white supremacist group. Often they are. In this case the group seems to be about pride in European heritage. If it is okay for a group to form around pride in African or Asian heritage, this should be fine too. If they consistently use the word "European" instead of "white" there will be much less fuss. That may be silly, but it is true.

Iuvenalis · « **Reply #2 on:** March 28, 2013, 10:51:40 AM »

Quote from: Sigismund

Whether or not it should be, I think the problem people have is that they assume that any such group is actually a white supremacist group. Often they are. In this case the group seems to be about pride in European heritage. If it is okay for a group to form around pride in African or Asian heritage, this should be fine too. If they consistently use the word "European" instead of "white" there will be much less fuss. That may be silly, but it is true.

What is funny about that is most of the various ethnic student unions e.g. Black Student Union (sometimes called 'Pan-African Student Associated' and other similar permutations) and groups like MEcHa are in fact 'power' groups. Mecha seeks a return of the entire southwest US to Mexico and do not recognize the US, referring to the Southwest and N. Mexico as 'Aztlan'

Matthew · « **Reply #3 on:** March 28, 2013, 10:57:51 AM »

And don't kid yourself -- Whites don't have a monopoly on racism.

Nor do Whites have a monopoly on "supremacism".

Why do you suppose you have the impression that it is more common for White groups to be "supremacist" than other races/nationalities?

Is it because there is truth to that charge, or is it because the media has programmed you to think that way?

I recommend everyone read about the history of Advertising in the 20th century. Even back in the 1940's our advertising technology -- including psychological techniques -- were downright scary. I shudder to think what they have now.

That's why I don't have a TV. It's simply too powerful.

Call me crazy, but I don't want some rich media baron to have full read/write access to my subconscious.

Matthew · « **Reply #4 on:** March 28, 2013, 10:59:55 AM »

Quote from: Iuvenalis

Quote from: Sigismund
Whether or not it should be, I think the problem people have is that they assume that any such group is actually a white supremacist group. Often they are. In this case the group seems to be about pride in European heritage. If it is okay for a group to form around pride in African or Asian heritage, this should be fine too. If they consistently use the word "European" instead of "white" there will be much less fuss. That may be silly, but it is true.

What is funny about that is most of the various ethnic student unions e.g. Black Student Union (sometimes called 'Pan-African Student Associated' and other similar permutations) and groups like MEcHa are in fact 'power' groups. Mecha seeks a return of the entire southwest US to Mexico and do not recognize the US, referring to the Southwest and N. Mexico as 'Aztlan'

Exactly.

And don't forget that some black supremacist groups have reconfigured history to make black people out of countless historical figures. They are supremacists in every sense of the word.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #5 on:** March 28, 2013, 11:07:00 AM »

The thinking that is being inculcated into the minds of whites is that they should consider joining another race as the optimal option.

The reason for this thinking is because they are targeted for soft extinction by the elites.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #6 on:** March 28, 2013, 11:09:12 AM »

We always hear about "White Supremacies". We never hear about the "Supremacies" when it comes to other racial groups,
especially "Jєωιѕн supremacy" whom for decades have controlled the
flow of information from the mass media. the educational institutions.,
and the churches etc. etc.
To get to the bottom of racial problems, the "Jєωιѕн supremacy" must
be exposed.
I refuse to capitalize "Jєωιѕн".

Kazimierz · « **Reply #7 on:** March 28, 2013, 11:12:30 AM »

As to being a racist, I consider myself a Groucho Marxist. :wink:

“I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally.”
Groucho Marx

With respect to Matthew's comment on television....

“I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book.”
Groucho Marx

Sigismund · « **Reply #8 on:** March 28, 2013, 12:50:01 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

And don't kid yourself -- Whites don't have a monopoly on racism.

Nor do Whites have a monopoly on "supremacism".

Why do you suppose you have the impression that it is more common for White groups to be "supremacist" than other races/nationalities?

Is it because there is truth to that charge, or is it because the media has programmed you to think that way?

I recommend everyone read about the history of Advertising in the 20th century. Even back in the 1940's our advertising technology -- including psychological techniques -- were downright scary. I shudder to think what they have now.

That's why I don't have a TV. It's simply too powerful.

Call me crazy, but I don't want some rich media baron to have full read/write access to my subconscious.

It is certainly true that whites have no monopole on racism. You only have to take a brief look at the Nation of Islam to see that.

As to whether white identified groups are actually more likely to be supremacist or whether that perception is due to presentations in the media, I expect the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

Sigismund · « **Reply #9 on:** March 28, 2013, 12:51:15 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

The thinking that is being inculcated into the minds of whites is that they should consider joining another race as the optimal option.

The reason for this thinking is because they are targeted for soft extinction by the elites.

How would you go about joining another race even if you wanted to? Your race is your race.

Renzo · « **Reply #10 on:** March 28, 2013, 01:32:40 PM »

As a supreme court justice once famously said, "i know it when i see it!" :wink:

Hatchc · « **Reply #11 on:** March 28, 2013, 03:48:23 PM »

One reason I'm uncomfortable with a word like racism and the term racial supremacism is due to natural things being given these labels.

I don't mind nonwhites and Jєωs being ethnocentric. Whites are ethnocentric, but they can't be open about it without risking all sorts of trouble. One problem I have with Kevin Macdonald is that he says whites are more likely to be individualists and not to look out for their group interests. But whites show by their actions that they are not so individualistic when it comes to wanting be with their own kind. The problem is that whites do not have the power to be openly ethnocentric. So they have to play this charade that they, at best, only half believe in.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #12 on:** March 28, 2013, 05:51:32 PM »

Quote from: Sigismund

Quote from: Capt McQuigg
The thinking that is being inculcated into the minds of whites is that they should consider joining another race as the optimal option.

The reason for this thinking is because they are targeted for soft extinction by the elites.

How would you go about joining another race even if you wanted to? Your race is your race.

By encouraging whites, on the basis of feeling that something is wrong with being white, to then seek out dating and become involved by marriage or just lustful activity, with non-whites.

It works rather wonderfully for the elites.

If the accounts are true about Obama, he was abandoned by his black dad, raised by an admixture of white mom, white grandparents yet he grew up longing for his black heritage and married a woman who is black. So, even though his black dad abandoned him, his heart longs for his black dad. This is repeated throughout, almost as if following a pattern.

Now, whether that pattern was formed by the prince of this world or the Jєωιѕн "elitists" is up to the viewer to decide. Either way, it's bad.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #13 on:** March 28, 2013, 05:56:27 PM »

The targeted soft extinction is because, particularly today and in the last 40 years, a white who intermingled with a non-white would produce a child that would, almost as if under a spell, embrace the culture of the non-white or the aim of that offspring is too often guided toward the lowest common denominator (i.e., enjoying rap music or embracing the kind of animalism that you see on MTV).

Look at the way whites have, as a group, embraced abortion rights. Look at the near disappearance (except in Trad Catholic environs) of large families. Now, the group here in this forum will be the exception but look around at some public school or go visit a nearby novus ordo church - the avg family size is 2 children, occasionally 3, but a generation ago the avg family would be 4 or more even among God-displeasing protestants.

Abortion is encouraged by the cultural elites and so is race-mixing. The elites know what they are doing and what they are doing is soft extinction of the white race. They are no particular fan of the other races either but the facts are what they are.

Renzo · « **Reply #14 on:** March 29, 2013, 10:49:59 AM »

I agree, there is a lot of animus towards whites in our modern culture, but in a culture that holds up equality as one of its very highest priorities, then it would seem whites are born with a kind of material superiority to some other races and that in their own homelands, they do have "privileges" that other races did/do not have. So, it would seem appropriate, if you really believed that equality was the end all be all of life and you just had to practice it in your own homeland, to talk about white privilege and to try and make up for it. Thus, all these attempts to "beat whites down," in order to level them with other races. Naturally, the thing doesn't work/leads to misery and death, because equality is not the end all be all of life; God is.