CathInfo.com

As many of you may be aware, there is a priest in Croatia by the name of Father Zlatko Sudac. Some believe He is a very strong candidate for the Angelic Pope. I second that.

He carries the Stigmata in the form of a cross on his forehead. There is another priest who claims this (Giorgio Bongiovanni) but I'm pretty sure He is a hoax. You would agree with me if you knew about the things He preaches (i.e. Extraterrestrials and some sins being harder for God to forgive than others). Anyways, the Stigmata has never been received on the forehead like this before. Now consider the following prophecy...

"The Pope will go over the sea carrying the sign of redemption on his forehead, and after the victory of the Pope and the Great Monarch, peace will reign on earth."
(Abbot Werdin d'Ortante, 13th century)

This would be just one bit of evidence that supports the theory that the Great Monarch is alive today with Father Sudac being the one to fulfill this prophecy. There are other bits of evidence (i.e. the Pahlavi Dynasty fulfilling Daniel 11:2). Plus all of the Middle East being upset with the Western World, and how eventually they will attempt to conquer Europe in order to spread Islam.

Anyways, I want to point out that Father Sudac is Novus Ordo. How do I know this? Because of the following interview...

http://www.stjeromecroatian.org/eng/frsudac.html

This article point out that Father Sudac has been investigated and confirmed as a true Stigmatic. If the Novus Ordo was really what you all say it is, then why would someone of the Novus Ordo receive the stamp of approval from God in the form of the Stigmata?

Furthermore, this may be evidence that Vatican II was legit.

Furthermore, this may be evidence that Vatican II was legit.

Sorry, wrong answer. No amount of signs, wonders or other magical gobbledygook will make the Second Vomitous Council valid, Catholic or even remotely Christian.

Why is it, Matthew (or anyone else) that there seems to be a rash of posters these days who are all excited about mystical signs and other business? Seems like there might be some collusion happening.

Anyway, 'stigmata' are, necessarily, the marks of the Wounds of Our Lord Jesus Christ appearing on a person's body, either physically (usually) or in some other temporary, miraculous way.

Our Lord did not have a cross-shaped wound on His Head; what some Abbot 'prophesied' centuries ago means nothing if said proclamations are not sanctioned by Holy Church as worthy of belief. This Abbot could have been anyone.

I also notice that this exact same topic has been posted ALL OVER the 'net on various forums.

My vote is to let this fortune-telling, prot-style end-times fixation drop so we can discuss matters that actually affect how we live out the Faith here and now. THAT, friends, is how we will prepare for what is to come, not by playing armchair prophet.

There is more evidence than just that one prophecy. It is all adding up.

Nothing is adding up with Vatican II, only if you use double-thinking mathematics which however is as unreal as double-thinking Concilarism.

Vatican II is an ordinary -- how do you say in English? -- "bandit council". Räuberkonzil in my language.
And so Vatican II will be tabula rasa as soon as God grants us an orthodox Pope.

And there's serious European Catholic prophecies which don't even count Vatican II as a council, because it was none.
But even without prophecies -- and this is much more important -- God does not contradict Himself, meaning Vatican II isn't legit because it's full with errors contracting the traditional Faith.

So, trust the traditional Faith of 2000 years, and then follow your reason (i.e. will + mind).
"The will must want reality, otherwise the mind will never find the truth. Truth for us men lies in the conformity of our minds to reality."