Bergoglio says the Church must not engage in proselytism -- Jesus Christ commanded that His Church proselytize the whole world. Bergoglio is Christ's adversary: we must resist him and obey Christ; as St. Peter said, "We must obey God rather than men".

"Go ye into the whole world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but that believeth not shall be condemned." (Mark 16: 15-16)

Which part of the preceding verses does Bergoglio not understand?

Bergoglio can obey the directive of the Jєωιѕн high priest if he wishes -- unto his own damnation. I will obey the command of Christ and the apostles rather than the dictates of the Scribes, Pharisees & Chief Priests of тαℓмυdism.

Not to mention the fact that in my own, small, personal experience
there are two very odd things happening at local chapels on a
DOCTRINAL level ~ things that should not be going on at all,
and things that are entirely unrelated to these Hewko-Perez-Kramer-
Gruner-Francis issues.

In the past, I have seen such coincidences occur just prior to a
rather huge event of some kind.  

So do not be surprised if there erupts something really big in the
next month.  This is the month of the Holy Rosary (starting tomorrow,
and for those in Central, Eastern or further time zones including UK
and Europe, it's already here), and the month that holds the end of
the 50th anniversary of the Most Regrettable Speech of John
XXIII of Infelicitous Memory (MRSJ23IM), delivered on October
11th, 1962.  

This 10-11 will be the beginning of the final 'stretch' of B16's
"Year of Unfaith"  -- uhh, sorry -- Year of Faith.  Typo there.  
The year plus a month-and-a-week-and-six-days extension to this
so-called Year of Faith will end on November 24th, the Modernist
Calendar day for Christ the King,  A)  in order to relegate Him to the
outer fringes and  B)  in order to displace the 24th and Last Sunday
after Pentecost, a lot like how the Modernists have attempted to
crush the Third Secret of Fatima by refusing to read its contents in
public like they should have done, now FIFTY THREE YEARS AGO, in
1960.  

One could think of it this way:  in October of 2012, when B16 was
already planning his abdication for February of 2013 without telling
anyone except perhaps his "elder brothers in the faith,"  he may
have seen this Year of Faith as his last hurrah to obfuscate the
annual Trad observance of the proper Feast of Jesus Christ, King,
which will occur this year on October 27th, where it belongs.  It is
there (and not at the end of the year like the Modernists prefer) to
communicate the FACT that the Social Kingship of Jesus Christ
belongs HERE and NOW in THIS WORLD, and is not relegated to
some distant point in the out-of-reach future, most preferably in
the NEXT WORLD and not at all in this one at all, which is another
Modernist Deception, one of Diabolical Disorientation.

4.  I heard a rumor about a month ago that I alluded to in the last post but sat on, but I think I’ll go ahead and post it here because it looks like it may be coming to fruition within the next few days.  The Pope is probably going to dissolve the College of Cardinals, and perhaps even the Cardinalate itself.

Can someone tell me where this rumor that the college of cardinals will be dismantled is coming from?

I just read another forum's entry about it, but it doesn't seem to make sense.

After all, Bergoglio has just created a council of cardinals to help him govern the Conciliar church.  We've just heard trial balloons sent up about the possibility of creating women cardinals.  What good is any of this if the rank of cardinal is to be eliminated or if the college is to be disbanded?

I'm not seeing anything other than bloggers talk about the elimination of cardinals.  Where is the rumor coming from?

We must also remember that Bergoglio is a Jesuit hippy straight out of the 1970s.  Hippies are defined by their hatred of authority.  Thus, as I have said from the beginning, Bergoglio has always and still does hate the central authority aspect of the Church.  This is why he referred to himself from literally his first moment as Pope not as “Pope” but as “Bishop of Rome”.  We have a pope who in his heart rejects the papacy itself.  Bergoglio does not believe that the Church should be governed by a central authority and instead should be broken up into local synods and bishops conferences who then basically “vote” on what their local “churches” hold as truth.  In short, Francis wants to turn the Catholic Church into the Episcopal “church”, which is to say, to destroy the Catholic Church from the inside-out.  If you don’t believe me, just look at this quote from his now-infamous interview with the heretical Jesuit magazine America published two weeks ago:

Quote

“The image of the church I like is that of the holy, faithful people of God. This is the definition I often use … the people itself constitutes a subject. And the church is the people of God on the journey through history, with joys and sorrows. Thinking with the church, therefore, is my way of being a part of this people. And all the faithful, considered as a whole, are infallible in matters of belief, and the people display this infallibilitas in credendo, this infallibility in believing, through a supernatural sense of the faith of all the people walking together.”

This is not Ratzinger talking.  This is the not-terribly-bright South American Jesuit Bergoglio talking, so we must unpack this statement as such.  This is Bergoglio falsely painting the popular will of the people as infallible, and truth as a derivative of the people.  The Truth is Jesus Christ, and the Church and every person that ever has or will exist is a derivative of HIM.

Maybe so, but  [Barnhardt's] analysis is pretty interesting [....]

catching-up-the-cardinals-and-peronist-fascism[/url] (Sep. 30, 2013)]We have to understand Bergoglio's politics first.  Bergoglio is a Peronist-Fascist.  You all know the Argentinian strongman Juan Peron and his wife Eva Peron from the musical Evita.  The closest comparison one can make of the Peronist milieu is to Mussolini's Blackshirt Italy.  Yeah.  Charming.  [....]  Peronist-Fascism is also rabidly, rabidly anti-aristocracy and anti-clerical.  This is why when I heard the scuttlebut that Francis was going to dissolve the College of Cardinals, I thought it a very plausible scenario.  The Cardinals are an aristocracy--they are literally the Princes of the Church.  IF Francis does this, it will gin up populist support--but don’t be fooled.  This is a very common maneuver among Marxists.  What the strongman does after dissolving a body is to then reform a new body populated entirely with his own hand-picked men.

And 'twas you who disagreed with her commentary on Bergoglio as a Peronist-Fascist.

But reading "About Ann Barnhardt" added to my skepticism about her being presented as an expert on religion.