...Why is Father Celier's book foreworded by Maxence, an author for GOdF Journal?
FWIW I had to look up Celier, Maxence and GOdF...
SourceThe program book«Benoît XVI et les ...
www.virgo-maria.org, 11 Nov 2009 [cached]
The program book«Benoît XVI et les traditionalistes» (« Benedict XVI and the traditionalists ») (March 12, 2007) of Father Celier (FSSPX), published by and with a foreword of a freemason [1] of the Grand 3 points Lodge 3 points of France 3 points
...
In the absence of any denial by Bishop Fellay, more than a month after the outbreak of the scandal without any reaction from his side, we cannot but conclude that it is clearly visible that Father Celier has had orders from Bishop Fellay and Father de Cacqueray to traverse France for two years in order to present in all the priories, before all the clergymen and faithfull, this program book of the joining of the SSPX with the Masonic ∴ , apostate, globalist Rome - a book published by and with a foreword of a freemason ∴ .
...
Father Celier's program book, published by and with a foreword from a freemason ∴ , was released on March 12, 2007 , and was immediately distributed and promoted in the media of the SSPX and in the priories , with the full and active support of the authority of Father de Cacqueray, who sold it himself in Nantes .
...
Bishop Fellay, Father Celier and the Masonic∴ editor of the G L F , have therefore planned to publish a program book that would be propagated by Father Celier in half of the priories of the SSPX in France, in two campaigns that would frame the release of the Motu Proprio as a sandwich.
...
I'm posting this so other readers who desire more info can follow this link (Source) above.
**************
I'm still waiting to see if someone can verify the quote above, where JG ostensibly says that these free-thinking enlightened webmasters (Daily Catholic, Novus Ordo Watch, Traditio) should be dragged out into the street and beaten.
I would have to presume that "He should go hang out with his Army buddies..." is a reply to my request. But I'm sorry, I'm not that much immersed in this stuff to know whether it is or not a reply to my question, above.
To publicly recommend that someone specific "should be dragged out into the street and beaten" is a pretty brazen move, for a man who runs a large Internet forum. If he had said that about the President, he should expect a visit from the goon squad. If any one of the "free-thinking, enlightened webmasters" ever gets physically attacked by anyone, JG would leave himself open for a lawsuit because of this post...