Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What happened to AQ Angel Queen  (Read 7961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What happened to AQ Angel Queen
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2012, 01:40:58 PM »
Quote from: Telesphorus
...Why is Father Celier's book foreworded by Maxence, an author for GOdF Journal?


FWIW I had to look up Celier, Maxence and GOdF...

Source

Quote
The program book«Benoît XVI et les ...
www.virgo-maria.org, 11 Nov 2009 [cached]
The program book«Benoît XVI et les traditionalistes» (« Benedict XVI and the traditionalists ») (March 12, 2007) of Father Celier (FSSPX), published by and with a foreword of a freemason [1] of the Grand 3 points Lodge 3 points of France 3 points
...
In the absence of any denial by Bishop Fellay, more than a month after the outbreak of the scandal without any reaction from his side, we cannot but conclude that it is clearly visible that Father Celier has had orders from Bishop Fellay and Father de Cacqueray to traverse France for two years in order to present in all the priories, before all the clergymen and faithfull, this program book of the joining of the SSPX with the Masonic ∴ , apostate, globalist Rome - a book published by and with a foreword of a freemason ∴ .
...
Father Celier's program book, published by and with a foreword from a freemason ∴ , was released on March 12, 2007 , and was immediately distributed and promoted in the media of the SSPX and in the priories , with the full and active support of the authority of Father de Cacqueray, who sold it himself in Nantes .
...
Bishop Fellay, Father Celier and the Masonic∴ editor of the G L F , have therefore planned to publish a program book that would be propagated by Father Celier in half of the priories of the SSPX in France, in two campaigns that would frame the release of the Motu Proprio as a sandwich.
...


I'm posting this so other readers who desire more info can follow this link (Source) above.

**************
I'm still waiting to see if someone can verify the quote above, where JG ostensibly says that these free-thinking enlightened webmasters (Daily Catholic, Novus Ordo Watch, Traditio) should be dragged out into the street and beaten.

I would have to presume that "He should go hang out with his Army buddies..." is a reply to my request. But I'm sorry, I'm not that much immersed in this stuff to know whether it is or not a reply to my question, above.

To publicly recommend that someone specific "should be dragged out into the street and beaten" is a pretty brazen move, for a man who runs a large Internet forum. If he had said that about the President, he should expect a visit from the goon squad. If any one of the "free-thinking, enlightened webmasters" ever gets physically attacked by anyone, JG would leave himself open for a lawsuit because of this post...


What happened to AQ Angel Queen
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2012, 05:07:25 PM »
What do you mean what happened to AngelQueen?  Can't you see that you're on it?  :wink:


What happened to AQ Angel Queen
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2012, 05:21:11 PM »
Quote from: Neil Obstat
To publicly recommend that someone specific "should be dragged out into the street and beaten" is a pretty brazen move, for a man who runs a large Internet forum. If he had said that about the President, he should expect a visit from the goon squad. If any one of the "free-thinking, enlightened webmasters" ever gets physically attacked by anyone, JG would leave himself open for a lawsuit because of this post...


St. Mary's KS is a very culty town.

What happened to AQ Angel Queen
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2012, 06:24:21 PM »
From John Grasmeier:

Quote
CLARITY

What’s going on with AQ?

Nearly everyone who’s contacted me appears to believe that AQ is not actually having technical difficulties, but is shut down due to actions or pressure from some 3rd party. Take your pick on the third party – a court, the SSPX, Rome… etc.

Let me state emphatically that although the timing is extremely prescient, the above is not the case. What’s happening to us now is what has been happening to us over the better part of a decade. We are using outdated and buggy SQL platform that is becoming difficult (more like impossible) to manage. Any of you who’ve been with us for a while have been through this before.

What’s going to happen to AQ?

Bad news:
This time it’s REALLY crashed. Bad enough that we’re not going to be able to continue in our current form. In fact, we wouldn't want to continue in our current form for the long term - even if we could somehow clean up the database. All we would be doing is kicking the bad software can down the road.

Good news:
Although initially I was leaning very much toward shutting down completely, I’m beginning looking at alternatives. Those of you who want to see a new version of AQ should pray that the masochist in me wins out here.

If we get a new AQ, what’s the deal?

If we do install a new AQ software it’s doubtful that we’ll take anything from the old AQ with us – except the people. No user accounts, posts or anything. All of that will be put into a (very large) file and saved for posterity. We’ll start with a totally clean slate.

The new software will still be a php bulletin board which at first it will be very VERY basic in look and functionality. No front page news ticker type setup, spell check, email alerts or a lot of the other bells and whistles that were developed over the years. That said, the new software is very scalable, so as time permits, the look and functionality will improve.

You’ll likely need to open a new account. On that note, being that we’ll have a more robust, more secure database and software platform, we can try opening up registration on a permanent basis.


Telesphorus:
Quote

 St. Mary's KS is a very culty town.


Be careful.....some of us live there! :)

What happened to AQ Angel Queen
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2012, 10:44:32 PM »
Quote from: Sigismund
Quote from: Hank
Either Angel Queen was hacked, or silenced by orders from authority.


Um...What authority?  


That's what I'd like to know. +Fellay ? When did the SSPX laity start showing any respect for the Society's  Superior General anyhow ?