Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: roscoeI have just received another email from Mr Sun. He is denying my allegation that he is implying Copernicus was a homo. He is now saying that the reference in his prev email to the perfidious nature of Copernicus is that he was an aduterer. His prev email says nothing re:adultery and subversively does indeed leave the impression that the man was a homo. At any rate, I don't even believe the adultery story. I hope the Forum will keep in mind that the very first thing Mr Sun says to me in his email is the sleaze allegation-- this w/o even bothering to answer the substance of my Real Galileo research at http://firstjesuits.wordpress.com My request of Mr Sun to provide the names of even a small minority( or even one) of scientists that have data showing S rev around E has been met with silence so far. Mr Sun has also been asked to join me here at cathinfo for a debate. Somewhere along the line I missed something. :scratchchin:
I have just received another email from Mr Sun. He is denying my allegation that he is implying Copernicus was a homo. He is now saying that the reference in his prev email to the perfidious nature of Copernicus is that he was an aduterer. His prev email says nothing re:adultery and subversively does indeed leave the impression that the man was a homo. At any rate, I don't even believe the adultery story. I hope the Forum will keep in mind that the very first thing Mr Sun says to me in his email is the sleaze allegation-- this w/o even bothering to answer the substance of my Real Galileo research at http://firstjesuits.wordpress.com My request of Mr Sun to provide the names of even a small minority( or even one) of scientists that have data showing S rev around E has been met with silence so far. Mr Sun has also been asked to join me here at cathinfo for a debate.