Remember your achilles heel?
h0Ɩ0cαųst Revisionism And its Political Consequences
Jürgen Graf, January 2001, in Tehran exile
15. The last battle
"Achieving our quest for a nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr depends upon our learning the h0Ɩ0cαųst's lesson." (Ian Kagedan, director of government relations for the Jєωιѕн Bnai Brith organisation, as quoted by the Toronto Star, 26 November 1991.)
a) The transformation of the h0Ɩ0cαųst into a religion
The orthodox h0Ɩ0cαųst story can not possibly be defended with rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing factories which left no traces whatsoever - no docuмents, no bones, no teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they would have acted to stop it.
Finally, we are asked to believe that the Jєωs in Poland, the epicentre of the h0Ɩ0cαųst, did not know anything about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise the Jєωs from the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related by Raul Hilberg in his standard work about the h0Ɩ0cαųst (Die Vernichtung der europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).
As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts to censorship and brute force in order to silence the dangerous heretics. And the Jєωs are gradually transforming the h0Ɩ0cαųst into a religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert Faurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific arguments. Thus, the h0Ɩ0cαųst museums and h0Ɩ0cαųst monuments spreading like mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new religion, whereas professional "h0Ɩ0cαųst survivors" such as Elie Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion, we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The h0Ɩ0cαųst is a holy mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The h0Ɩ0cαųst in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high priest of the h0Ɩ0cαųst cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further: "When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).
No critical questions about the h0Ɩ0cαųst are allowed because they are a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of persecution, the Jєωs, and are an attempt to whitewash National Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the h0Ɩ0cαųst possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered inadmissible to compare the h0Ɩ0cαųst with the atrocities of communist tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime in history.
French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long and unspeakably dull film about the h0Ɩ0cαųst (the title of this film is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by Jєωs as a synonym for "h0Ɩ0cαųst") makes no effort to conceal that the h0Ɩ0cαųst cult is to replace Christianity:
"If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...) In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him. (...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes, Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.)
Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jєωs do not believe in God any more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the h0Ɩ0cαųst to unite the World's Jєωs by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jєωs stick together will they be able to ban the threat of a new h0Ɩ0cαųst.
It goes without saying that very few Non-Jєωs are willing to embrace the murky h0Ɩ0cαųst religion. While the overwhelming majority of people in the West still believe that the official h0Ɩ0cαųst version is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal lamentation about Jєωιѕн victims and Jєωιѕн suffering. They simply don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that a vast majority of the population was against the planned h0Ɩ0cαųst monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose).
Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with the endless h0Ɩ0cαųst litany as the rest of the population, but they cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they own their careers and their wealth.
b) The function of the h0Ɩ0cαųst in the world since 1945
The political consequences of the h0Ɩ0cαųst since 1945 have been tremendous. When I speak about the "h0Ɩ0cαųst", I do not mean a historical fact, as the extermination of the Jєωs in chemical slaughterhouses did not actually take place. But in the mind of the populace, this extermination is as real as the Second World War or the Egyptian pyramids, while real genocides, such as the artificially provoked Ukrainian famine in which several million people were deliberately starved to death by the Communists in 1932/1933, are all but forgotten.
Let us have a close look at these consequences:
- The creation of the state of Israel "Without the h0Ɩ0cαųst, there would be no Jєωιѕн state." This candid statement was made by a Jєω, Robert Goldman (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 19 December 1997, p. 9). Goldman was right. Without the h0Ɩ0cαųst, the world would never have permitted the founding of a Jєωιѕн state in Palestine three years after the war. The colonial era was coming to an end at this time. The British had already decided to give India her independence, while dozens of Asian and African territories were striving to shake off the rule of the White Man. While other powers were rushing to grant independence to their colonies, the Jєωs in Palestine were allowed to embark on a colonial adventure par excellence, with the blessing of both the West and the Soviet Union.
In order to ensure that their state would have a Jєωιѕн majority, the Zionists proceeded with ruthless brutality; whole villages were levelled, thousands of Arabs were murdered (Deir Yassein was but one of many massacres), and a great proportion of the Palestinians were expelled from the land of their ancestors. The ones who remained behind have been subject to severe repression ever since. According to the very pro-Zionist Swiss weekly Die Weltwoche (22 October 1992), no less than 15.000 Palestinian political prisoners were languishing in Israeli jails in 1992, and the use of torture was officially sanctioned by the Israeli supreme court in November 1996. As I am writing these lines, Israeli soldiers are shooting unarmed Palestinian demonstrators, many of whom are children, every day.
Jєωιѕн terror in occupied Palestine is not actually encouraged or approved by world opinion, but it is tolerated. After all, the Jєωιѕн people need a homeland to protect them from a new h0Ɩ0cαųst, and what are the sufferings of the Palestinians compared to those of the Jєωs under Hitler? Let us beware of illusions: As long as people in the West believe in the six million and the gas chambers, they will always support Israel in principle, even if they criticise the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians as being unnecessarily harsh.
Without outside assistance, the Zionist parasite state would not be viable. Its chief source of revenue consists of financial injections from America, support from international Jєωry and German reparations. According to official sources, the Federal Republic of Germany had paid 85,4 billion Deutschmarks by 1992 (Der Spiegel, 18/1992), but the real sum is much higher. In addition, there have been enormous deliveries in the form of commodities. Nahum Goldmann, long-time chairman of the Jєωιѕн World Congress, made no secret of this fact; he wrote:
"Without the German reparations that started coming during its first ten years as a state, Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure. All the trains are German, and the same goes for electrical installations and a great deal of Israel's industry" (Nahum Goldmann, Das juedische Paradox, Europaeische Verlagsanstalt, 1978, p. 171).
In 1999, Germany provided Israel with ultra-modern submarines which can carry nuclear missiles. The Israelis did not have to pay a penny - the submarines were another token of German atonement for the h0Ɩ0cαųst!
- Jєωιѕн Immunity of the Jєωs from criticism. Before 1945, criticism of Jєωs was legitimate. Today, that is no longer the case. Even the slightest criticism of Jєωιѕн power and Jєωιѕн arrogance - for example the heavy influence of the Jєωs in the mass media of the West, the staggeringly high number of Jєωs in the Clinton administration, or the impertinent behaviour of the Central Jєωιѕн Council in Germany - is immediately shouted down with screams about Auschwitz. The effectiveness of this intimidation is demonstrated by the following fact: The most obnoxious criminal organisation in the world is regularly referred to as the "Russian Mafia" although virtually all bosses are Jєωιѕн, often with Israeli passports. This is irrefutably demonstrated by Juergen Roth in his docuмentation Die Russen-Mafia (Rasch und Roehring, Hamburg 1996). The title of the book translates as "The Russian Mafia", for if it were "The Jєωιѕн Mafia", the author would have gone to a German jail, and his book would have been burnt. In today's Russia, five or six out of the seven big "oligarchs" who made their fabulous fortunes with money stolen from the Russian people are Jєωs. This is never mentioned in the Western media.
- Creating contempt for the German nation. Since 1945, the German people have been branded with a mark of shame. Self-contempt and self-hatred is the prevailing trend, while self-respect and patriotism are held in contempt.
After the 1991 war against Iraq, George Bush senior, who was then president of the USA, publicly spoke of a "nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr" which he did not care to define. As a matter of fact, the "nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr" means that America, as the undisputed superpower, can impose its policy and its dubious values on all other countries. And America is nowadays largely ruled by the Jєωs. (Even if Jєωιѕн influence is much less pervasive in the Republican party than in the Democratic one, the Jєωs still own virtually every major newspaper and most of the television chains so that no Republican president can afford to govern against them. In modern society, nobody can govern against the media, as Richard Nixon learned to his disadvantage a quarter of a century ago.)
c) What would happen if the h0Ɩ0cαųst were publicly exposed as a fraud?
If the h0Ɩ0cαųst were publicly exposed as a shameless fraud, if people all over the world learned that, while the Jєωs undoubtedly were brutally persecuted during the Second World War, there was no attempt to exterminate them, that the death factories, gas chambers and gas vans were a Jєωιѕн swindle, and that the six million figure was a fantastic exaggeration, the Zionist-led "nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr" would be all but finished.
Germany would become ungovernable; the German people would feel nothing but hatred and contempt for the politicians, intellectuals and journalists who betrayed and humiliated them day after day. The whole establishment of the country would be hopelessly discredited. This the representatives of the establishment know. On August 15, 1994, journalist Patrick Bahners, commenting on the trial of revisionist Guenter Deckert who was sent to prison for "h0Ɩ0cαųst denial", wrote in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: "If Deckert's attitude on the h0Ɩ0cαųst were correct, the Federal Republic of Germany would be based on a lie. Every presidential speech, every minute of silence, every history book would be a lie. Therefore, he [Deckert], by denying the genocide of the Jєωs, disputes the legitimicy of the Federal Republic of Germany." The problem could hardly be stated more aptly. Some German opinion makers now openly declare that the h0Ɩ0cαųst is the foundation of the post-war German state. This is shown by a quotation from the influential newspaper Die Welt (28 April 1994): "Whoever denies the truth about the National socialist extermination camps relinquishes the foundations upon which the Federal Republic of Germany was built."
But also in other Western countries, the belief in the so-called "democratic system" would be profoundly shaken as people would ask themselves why this charade had to be propped up with censorship and naked terror for decades.
While the consequences of a public exposure of the h0Ɩ0cαųst as a fraud would be most serious for the Western system as a whole, they would be catastrophic beyond repair for international Jєωry and the State of Israel. There would be a world-wide wave of anti-Jєωιѕн feeling, and no non-Jєω would be willing to support the Zionist parasite state any more. German reparations would stop overnight, and the USA would have to reduce its financial aid to Israel so drastically that it would be bankrupt after no more than a year. The Jєωs in Israel would be utterly demoralised, as they would instinctively understand that a state founded upon such a colossal fraud has no moral right to exist. Since the h0Ɩ0cαųst religion, which unites Jєωs all over the world, would collapse, international Jєωιѕн solidarity would be a thing of the past. And the anger of the Palestinians would assume gigantic dimensions as they would understand that they had their country stolen and their sons shot in the name of a lie.
d) The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel
At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with stones and slings.
When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the h0Ɩ0cαųst lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to ascertain what really happened to the Jєωs during the Second World War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy of Israel and international Jєωry.
Thus, the revisionists objectively work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in more and more countries.
In view of the total Jєωιѕн media control and the ever-growing anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the internet, which the Jєωs are unable to censure, has greatly improved our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure to the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I have repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly accept the truth about the h0Ɩ0cαųst, but as they know that even the slightest suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and legal persecution, they understandably prefer not to get involved. However, if we want to win the war against those whom one of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind", we have no choice but to destroy the Big Lie, lest the Big Lie destroy us.
The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of h0Ɩ0cαųst revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars, yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a thousand missiles can destroy.
Topic: What does it take... (Read 1708 times)