But he should also remember that when female emotions and children are concerned, sometimes gentle guidance is more prudent.

A man's constitution should never be based on females' emotions. To concede to female feelings is a recipe for disaster. Female emotions change like a river's undercurrent. The Lord God tells us in holy scripture that wives should fear their husbands. It doesn't say for wives to influence husband's decisions by emoting to them.

Regarding children, they should, also, fear their fathers as much as they love him. One reason children are chaotic, undisciplined, disrespectful brats these days is because their false sense of "security" and willingness to engage in behaviors without accountability or fearing consequences is the result of not fearing their fathers (if they even have a father in the household).

I think a wise husband would often take into account his wife's emotions before making rational decisions for the family.   

Usually, a man can't make rational decisions when factoring in the wife's emotions, because women's emotions are generally the antithesis of rational.

God gave us womanly emotions and tenderness to help soften the world and make it a more pleasant and civilized place for men to dwell.

Is that why most supporters and enablers of perverts against nature and the scandal against children (subjecting them to these perverts through a variety of mediums, and introducing them to taking on the opposite sɛҳuąƖ identity) are WOMEN?

You have a point. This is where Quid reminds me of a now-banned user named Croix de Fer, who shared similar sentiments about women. Now he was a pompous ass, and Quid is not. But the sentiments are kind of similar.

Great thread! Being married over 50 years, we're learned that:
God created men and women to compliment each other.
God created the husband to provide and protect.
God created the woman to nurture and to build faith and relationships.
The husband is to cherish his wife.
The wife is to respect her husband.
For me, the most important thing I've learned is that I would rather be cherished than be right.
The more I respect him, the more he cherishes me.
The more he cherishes me, the more willing I am to overlook things.
The more I overlook things, the more he cherishes me.

Great post! Who in their right mind would downthumb over 50 years of marital experience and such wisdom?
Care to explain yourself, downthumber?

You have a point. This is where Quid reminds me of a now-banned user named Croix de Fer, who shared similar sentiments about women. Now he was a pompous ass, and Quid is not. But the sentiments are kind of similar.

ha ha ... Your personality assessment aside, considering the videos Quid posted a few days ago from Pastor D's protege, I'd say there's a decent probability that Croix & Quid are the same person.

Did you bother to read  past the title of the thread?
What do you know of the  OP's past?

People can give all kinds of advice over the internet and yet they do not live by their advice. The OP will receive all kinds of military grade chaff and at the end won't know what his name is.
My advice is to get to know a real family that is a good example by the way they actually live, not a cyberspace "ideal" family created by what people say over the internet. There's a lot involved in being a good husband, wife, father, mother, brother, it is learned from observing real people over time. "By their deeds you shall know them". The first example is your parents.

LT, some people’s parents have given horrific examples of gender roles, and how to be in a good Catholic marriage. So, asking advice from other Catholics who are trying to keep the true faith is probably the better road to take.

Asking complex advice about life in cyberspace is a total waste of time. Only by direct long term observation and friendship with an exemplar family can one learn how to behave. 
Horrific parents can be examples of what not to do.