What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common?

Before I reveal why I see a common thread with these three positions, I like to see what other forum members believe the connection to be.

What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common?

Common sense. 

They brush their teeth. 

Common sense.

Priceless!

Now, please explain how I employ the same tactics....

Saying that we interpret scripture our own way.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I post quotes from Fathers, Doctors, Popes, saints and ancients like Moses, Enoch, Cosmas, St. Jerome, St. John Chrysostom, St. Robert Bellarmine, Bishop Severian of Gabala, Methodius and scripture.  Blaming flat earthers for the fact that scripture and the Fathers agree on flat geocentric earth is like blaming the Pope for being Catholic.  Ridiculous.  

1) I don’t believe that the Church has ever raised to the level of dogma that the Earth is a globe.
2) I don’t consider those who believe in a FE to be outside the Church because of #1, however I do consider then extremely gullible people.
3) I do believe in the geocentric model, but I don’t believe that one is a heretic if he doubts or denies it.
4) I question your interpretation of what the authorities you cite wrote, so please cite them.
5) Even if it is unquestionably true that a few of them believed in a FE, the vast majority disagrees.

"Major est Scripturae auctoritas quam omnis humani ingenii capacitas."  "Nothing is to be accepted save on the authority of Scripture, since greater is that authority than all the powers of the human mind."  --St. Augustine, Commentary on the Book of Genesis

What is obvious to a rational and objective person is the fact that all three groups prefer *their* own interpretation of Scripture, tradition, and the Church’s councils to the common opinion (sometimes unanimous opinion) of what the Church’s experts (Popes, theologians, Doctors) teach.
In a word...PRIDE.

Nah.  FE is not even a theological opinion, but a scientific one, so it's really outside the scope of Popes, theologians, Doctors, etc.  None of these Catholic authorities have ever taught that the earth is a sphere.  As for rejection of BoD, that's indeed counter to the popular opinion, but that doesn't mean it's wrong.  Now, the dogmatic anti-sedevacantists -- you're actually quite mistaken on that one.  Theologians agree that the Universal Church cannot accept a false pope, so YOU are running counter-current on that one.

If I've seen anyone who's guilty of pride, it's really the dogmatic sedevacantists; they're BY FAR the worst.

Sedevacantists like Recusant refuse to see the contradiction of claiming, on the one hand, that the consensus of theologians is effectively infallible and a proximate rule of faith while, on the other hand, asserting that the consensus of all the Church's bishops teaching the Universal Church in Ecuмenical Council failed.  So theologians can't be wrong while the entire Ecclesia Docens, the world's bishops, can teach heresy and defect en masse.  Anti-BoD sedevacantists also claim that heretical ecclesiology is the chief of Vatican II's errors while at the same time holding the same ecclesiology themselves in their obsessive neurotic attack against Father Feeney, the only man who REALLY saw what was happening in the Church.  Sedevacantists champion the cause of the Heresiarch Cushing over the faithful Traditional Father Feeney.