Author Topic: What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common? (Read 11443 times)

Meg · « **Reply #55 on:** December 05, 2017, 11:30:58 AM »

Quote from: Kreuzritter on December 05, 2017, 11:27:48 AM

So you keep saying. And then all we get from you are retarded images such as this one, the verses wich it refers to implying NOTHING WHATSOEVER about the shape of the Earth:

How do "waters above" imply a flat Earth? Please define the concept of "above" in a manner that doesn't presuppose a flat Earth.
Analagously, how does "wtaers below" imply a flat Earth?
How does a firmament imply a flat Earth?
How does ח֣וּג in Isaiah 40:22 imply a flat Earth?
How does בְּגֹ֥ואin Daniel 4:10 imply a flat Earth?
How do a moving Sun and Moon imply a flat Earth?
How does the immovability of the Earth imply it is flat?
How do "foundations" imply a flat Earth? Please no circular arguments.

Are you even open to having your questions answered? Somehow I doubt it. Or are your questions just rhetorical?

From what you've posted previously, I think that you have zero interest in really understanding how the flat earth works.

Meg · « **Reply #56 on:** December 05, 2017, 12:01:18 PM »

Quote from: Kreuzritter on December 05, 2017, 11:40:01 AM

I'm not interested in "how the flat earth works". I want logical deductions proving that the quoted verses are impossibilities unless the Earth is flat. Put up or shut up, woman.

You have shown that you have no interest in logical deductions. None whatsoever.

Meg · « **Reply #57 on:** December 05, 2017, 12:17:27 PM »

Quote from: Kreuzritter on December 05, 2017, 12:13:00 PM

Quod erat demonstradnum. This shoes that quoted verses are all compatible with a spherical model. ח֣וּג just means "vault", like "vaults of the Heavens", implyign nothing about flatness, and בְּגֹ֥ואin means "midst", and again a tree appearing in the midst of the world implies nothing about flatness, but if you want to insist, a spherical Earth HAS a center.

Go on Meg. Show us how the verse cannot fit the model.

You have zero interest in any answer I would give. Or that anyone else would give. You're just another angry globe-earther, who wants to disprove the flat earth. You have already made up your mind, and are not open to anything but proving the flat earthers wrong. You are disingenuous.

No thanks.

You can think me a coward if you like. Globe-earthers have called me far worse, because they are immature.

Meg · « **Reply #58 on:** December 05, 2017, 12:29:11 PM »

Quote from: Kreuzritter on December 05, 2017, 12:27:13 PM

Question: how can Heaven be infinite if it is infinitely limited in the direction of the Earth?

By the way, where do the foundations of the Earth in the flat model end? Since everything falls "down", where "down" is a direction peperdicular to and towards the flat plane of the Earth, and the Earth needs foundations in order not to fall itself, what about the foundations?

If they end, what do they sit upon, and how are these upheld? Are they infinite, or rest upon somethign infinite, again, how is that which is infinite upheld? After all, it's perfectly reasonable to consider an infinite body to be in motion, so what stops the foundations, finite or infinite, from moving, given that everythign material must move in a downward direction unless upheld by something that in its turns needs to be immovable?

Please don't pretend that you are actually interested in an answer. You are not. We both know that.

And....it's too many questions. Like someone with ADD would ask.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common? (Read 11443 times)

Meg

Re: What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common?

Meg

Re: What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common?

Meg

Re: What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common?

Meg

Re: What do FEers, BOD deniers, and dogmatic anti-sedevacantists have in common?