And E continues to rev around S :cheers:
And your mind continues to revolve around formal heresy ... and may even have come in for a landing.
The Forum awaits a clarification of your post claiming that St Thomas was wrong about a 'few other things' .....
Few, I believe, means at least 3.
What do you mean by this??? :confused1:
Take it to a different thread. One study found 40-some material errors in the works of St. Thomas (more than 3). Research it.
You're trying to distract from your heresy with lame ad hominems.
No, I don't consider your heliocentrism to be heresy per se. What I consider heresy is your imputation of error to Sacred Scripture.
So you'll claim that St. Thomas is infallible while Sacred Scripture is not?
Sorry but i don't believe in heliocentrism...
Science has shown the universe to be acentric..... not heliocentric or geocentric
Pls show where I have endorsed the heliocentric model....
Now we are being told that 'one study found 40 some material errors...'
Pls cite the specific 'study' you are referring to.
The Forum is now witnessing an unprecedented attack on St Thomas.... :detective: